Suppr超能文献

当有关疫苗安全性的说服性信息引导 COVID-19 疫苗的接受和推荐时会发生什么?来自马来西亚随机对照试验的行为洞察。

When do persuasive messages on vaccine safety steer COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and recommendations? Behavioural insights from a randomised controlled experiment in Malaysia.

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Institute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Institute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jul;7(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009250.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Vaccine safety is a primary concern among vaccine-hesitant individuals. We examined how seven persuasive messages with different frames, all focusing on vaccine safety, influenced Malaysians to accept the COVID-19 vaccine, and recommend it to individuals with different health and age profiles; that is, healthy adults, the elderly, and people with pre-existing health conditions.

METHODS

A randomised controlled experiment was conducted from 29 April to 7 June 2021, which coincided with the early phases of the national vaccination programme when vaccine uptake data were largely unavailable. 5784 Malaysians were randomly allocated into 14 experimental arms and exposed to one or two messages that promoted COVID-19 vaccination. Interventional messages were applied alone or in combination and compared against a control message. Outcome measures were assessed as intent to both take the vaccine and recommend it to healthy adults, the elderly, and people with pre-existing health conditions, before and after message exposure. Changes in intent were modelled and we estimated the average marginal effects based on changes in the predicted probability of responding with a positive intent for each of the four outcomes.

RESULTS

We found that persuasive communication via several of the experimented messages improved recommendation intentions to people with pre-existing health conditions, with improvements ranging from 4 to 8 percentage points. In contrast, none of the messages neither significantly improved vaccination intentions, nor recommendations to healthy adults and the elderly. Instead, we found evidence suggestive of backfiring among certain outcomes with messages using negative attribute frames, risky choice frames, and priming descriptive norms.

CONCLUSION

Message frames that briefly communicate verbatim facts and stimulate rational thinking regarding vaccine safety may be ineffective at positively influencing vaccine-hesitant individuals. Messages intended to promote recommendations of novel health interventions to people with pre-existing health conditions should incorporate safety dimensions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05244356.

摘要

简介

疫苗安全是疫苗犹豫者最关心的问题。我们研究了七种具有不同框架的有说服力的信息,这些信息都集中在疫苗安全性上,它们如何影响马来西亚人接受 COVID-19 疫苗,并向不同健康和年龄人群推荐,即健康成年人、老年人和有预先存在健康状况的人。

方法

一项随机对照试验于 2021 年 4 月 29 日至 6 月 7 日进行,这与全国疫苗接种计划的早期阶段相吻合,当时疫苗接种数据基本上不可用。5784 名马来西亚人被随机分配到 14 个实验组,并接触到一条或两条促进 COVID-19 疫苗接种的信息。干预信息单独或组合使用,并与对照信息进行比较。在接触信息前后,评估接种疫苗和向健康成年人、老年人和有预先存在健康状况的人推荐疫苗的意愿。我们对意图变化进行建模,并根据对每个四个结果的积极意向的预测概率的变化来估计平均边际效应。

结果

我们发现,通过几种实验信息进行的有说服力的沟通提高了向有预先存在健康状况的人推荐的意愿,改善幅度从 4 个百分点到 8 个百分点不等。相比之下,没有一条信息显著提高接种疫苗的意愿,也没有提高向健康成年人和老年人的推荐意愿。相反,我们发现一些消息使用负面属性框架、风险选择框架和启动描述性规范的消息存在适得其反的证据。

结论

简单传达疫苗安全性的逐字事实并激发对疫苗安全的理性思考的信息框架可能无法有效地影响疫苗犹豫者。旨在向有预先存在健康状况的人推荐新的健康干预措施的信息应包含安全维度。

试验注册号

NCT05244356。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd08/9344599/bc1d5c7017b9/bmjgh-2022-009250f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验