• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生对STEM混合学习环境中数字素养的自我认知。

Student Self-perception on Digital Literacy in STEM Blended Learning Environments.

作者信息

Le Branda, Lawrie Gwendolyn A, Wang Jack T H

机构信息

School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland (UQ), SCMB, Building 68 Cooper Road, Brisbane, QLD 4067 Australia.

出版信息

J Sci Educ Technol. 2022;31(3):303-321. doi: 10.1007/s10956-022-09956-1. Epub 2022 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1007/s10956-022-09956-1
PMID:35132301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8809496/
Abstract

As students transition into tertiary blended learning environments, their digital literacy in terms of technical capabilities have potential to impact on their access to digital resources. The first foundational year of STEM degrees includes compulsory courses across a broad range of scientific areas, each of which incorporates online technology in a discipline-specific manner. Given the diversity of online resources that STEM students need to access across their first-year coursework, this study applies learning analytical methods to determine whether students' perceived level of digital literacy has an effect on their navigation of learning management systems (LMS) and overall academic performance. The frequency and nature of LMS interactivity were examined across four first-year STEM courses offered in the same semester at a single institution, using a K-means cluster analysis to group student responses. It was observed that high achieving students accessed LMS resources more frequently than mid or low-achieving students across all four STEM courses. Students' perceived level of digital literacy was collected via survey ( = 282), and students were sorted high ( = 106) and low-level ( = 176) of perceived digital literacy-HDL and LDL, respectively. HDL students were not consistently found in the high-achieving academic group and did not perform better in their overall grade when compared to LDL students. LDL students were observed to perform better in specific online assessment tasks, which may be attributed to their increased frequency of LMS interactivity. These findings highlight the delicate balance between students' perceived level of digital literacy, motivation for engaging with online learning environments, and academic performance.

摘要

随着学生向高等混合学习环境过渡,他们在技术能力方面的数字素养有可能影响其获取数字资源的机会。STEM学位的第一年基础课程包括广泛科学领域的必修课,每门课程都以特定学科的方式融入了在线技术。鉴于STEM专业学生在第一年课程中需要访问的在线资源多种多样,本研究应用学习分析方法来确定学生的数字素养感知水平是否会对他们在学习管理系统(LMS)中的导航以及整体学业成绩产生影响。在同一学期由一所机构提供的四门一年级STEM课程中,使用K均值聚类分析对学生的回答进行分组,以研究LMS交互的频率和性质。结果发现,在所有四门STEM课程中,成绩优异的学生比成绩中等或较差的学生更频繁地访问LMS资源。通过调查收集了学生的数字素养感知水平(n = 282),并将学生分别分为数字素养感知水平高(n = 106)和低(n = 176)的两组——HDL和LDL。在成绩优异的学术群体中并没有一直发现HDL学生,并且与LDL学生相比,他们的总成绩也没有更好。观察发现LDL学生在特定的在线评估任务中表现更好,这可能归因于他们增加了LMS交互的频率。这些发现突出了学生的数字素养感知水平、参与在线学习环境的动机和学业成绩之间的微妙平衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b2/8809496/eaf8f6a99f78/10956_2022_9956_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b2/8809496/f6c35da04c73/10956_2022_9956_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b2/8809496/e22487e8eee5/10956_2022_9956_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b2/8809496/b22e5250dce6/10956_2022_9956_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b2/8809496/c3069f91ace9/10956_2022_9956_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b2/8809496/ab1d1473373d/10956_2022_9956_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b2/8809496/eaf8f6a99f78/10956_2022_9956_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b2/8809496/f6c35da04c73/10956_2022_9956_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b2/8809496/e22487e8eee5/10956_2022_9956_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b2/8809496/b22e5250dce6/10956_2022_9956_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b2/8809496/c3069f91ace9/10956_2022_9956_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b2/8809496/ab1d1473373d/10956_2022_9956_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b2/8809496/eaf8f6a99f78/10956_2022_9956_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Student Self-perception on Digital Literacy in STEM Blended Learning Environments.学生对STEM混合学习环境中数字素养的自我认知。
J Sci Educ Technol. 2022;31(3):303-321. doi: 10.1007/s10956-022-09956-1. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
Pre-registration nursing students' perceptions of their baseline digital literacy and what it means for education: A prospective COHORT survey study.注册护士学生对其基础数字素养的认知及其对教育的意义:一项前瞻性队列调查研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Apr;111:105308. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105308. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
3
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
4
Self-reported and digital-trace measures of computer science students' self-regulated learning in blended course designs.混合课程设计中计算机科学专业学生自我调节学习的自我报告和数字痕迹测量。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 Mar 24:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11698-5.
5
Students' Engagement in and Perceptions of Blended Learning in a Clinical Module in a Veterinary Degree Program.学生对兽医学位课程临床模块中混合式学习的参与度和看法。
J Vet Med Educ. 2021 Apr;48(2):181-195. doi: 10.3138/jvme.2019-0018. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
6
Sustaining blended and online learning during the normal and new normal conditions in a Saudi higher education institution: health science students' perspectives.沙特高等教育机构在正常和新常态条件下维持混合式和在线学习:健康科学专业学生的观点
Heliyon. 2022 Oct 4;8(10):e10898. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10898. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
The relationship between student engagement with online content and achievement in a blended learning anatomy course.混合式学习解剖课程中学生对在线内容的参与度与学习成绩之间的关系。
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;11(5):471-477. doi: 10.1002/ase.1761. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
8
Video feedback and e-Learning enhances laboratory skills and engagement in medical laboratory science students.视频反馈和电子学习增强了医学实验室科学专业学生的实验室技能和参与度。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1745-1.
9
A blended learning exercise physiology theory module that supports student autonomy and improves academic performance.支持学生自主性并提高学习成绩的混合学习运动生理学理论模块。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2022 Sep 1;46(3):375-388. doi: 10.1152/advan.00023.2022. Epub 2022 May 12.
10
Digital mental health literacy -program for the first-year medical students' wellbeing: a one group quasi-experimental study.数字心理健康素养计划对医学生幸福感的影响:一项单组准实验研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Nov 6;21(1):563. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02990-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptance and Use of Technology on Digital Learning Resource Utilization and Digital Literacy Among Chinese Engineering Students: A Longitudinal Study Based on the UTAUT2 Model.中国工科学生对数字学习资源利用和数字素养的技术接受与使用:基于UTAUT2模型的纵向研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 24;15(6):728. doi: 10.3390/bs15060728.
2
Digital literacy in the university setting: A literature review of empirical studies between 2010 and 2021.大学环境中的数字素养:2010年至2021年间实证研究的文献综述
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 6;13:896800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896800. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Differences in Student Learning and Behavior Between Real-life and Virtual Reality Chemistry Laboratories.探索现实生活与虚拟现实化学实验室中学生学习与行为的差异。
J Sci Educ Technol. 2021;30(6):862-876. doi: 10.1007/s10956-021-09925-0. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
2
Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning.面对面还是面对屏幕?本科生对课堂与在线学习的看法及测试表现。
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 12;5:1278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01278. eCollection 2014.
3
Comfort and experience with online learning: trends over nine years and associations with knowledge.
在线学习的舒适度与体验:九年趋势及与知识的关联
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jul 1;14:128. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-128.
4
Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs.计算并报告效应量以促进累积科学:t检验和方差分析实用入门指南
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.
5
Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology.翻转课堂模式提高了研究生在心血管、呼吸和肾脏生理学方面的表现。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2013 Dec;37(4):316-20. doi: 10.1152/advan.00091.2013.
6
Impact of undergraduate science course innovations on learning.本科理科课程创新对学习的影响。
Science. 2011 Mar 11;331(6022):1269-70. doi: 10.1126/science.1198976.