Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (Institute of Psychology, Department of Psychotherapy).
Institute of Group Analysis "Rasztów," Warsaw, Poland.
Med Pr. 2022 Feb 18;73(1):1-12. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.01002. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
The study concerned workplace mobbing, a phenomenon affecting about 3-20% of the Polish population. The aim of the article is to distinguish the manifestations of mobbing, to study the coexistence of mobbing manifestations, and to search for the relationships between the symptoms of mobbing, reactions to mobbing and methods of dealing with mobbing used by victims.
Information on the above variables was obtained using a questionnaire on mobbing, risk factors, and responses to mobbing. The questionnaire was completed by 781 people (women: 66%, men: 34%). The average age of the respondents was 29 years. The current statistical analysis included: distinguishing the manifestations of mobbing by means of a confirmatory factor analysis, studying the coexistence of mobbing manifestations by means of a cluster analysis, and detecting the relationships between mobbing manifestations, reactions to mobbing and ways of dealing with it based on the system of structural equations.
The results of the research revealed 3 categories of relationships: a co-occurrence of mobbing manifestations, a relationship of mobbing manifestations with reactions to mobbing, and a relationship of mobbing reactions with methods of dealing with mobbing.
Mobbing was found in 22% of the examined group. The study revealed the existence of 5 clusters of mobbing manifestations (i.e., subgroups of respondents characterized by experiencing at least 1 of the mobbing manifestations). In the most numerous clusters in which the symptoms of mobbing were diagnosed, unfriendly working conditions prevailed. In the context of mobbing, people were found to more often react with passivity or with using interpersonal coping methods. However, they rarely turned to institutions for help or used aggression against the mobber. Med Pr. 2022;73(1):1-12.
本研究关注工作场所骚扰现象，该现象影响约 3-20%的波兰人口。本文的目的是区分骚扰的表现形式，研究骚扰表现形式的共存，并探讨受骚扰者的骚扰症状、对骚扰的反应和应对骚扰方法之间的关系。
使用关于骚扰、风险因素和对骚扰的反应的问卷获得上述变量的信息。共有 781 人（女性：66%，男性：34%）完成了问卷。受访者的平均年龄为 29 岁。目前的统计分析包括：通过验证性因素分析来区分骚扰的表现形式，通过聚类分析来研究骚扰表现形式的共存，以及基于结构方程系统来检测骚扰表现形式、对骚扰的反应和应对骚扰的方法之间的关系。
研究结果揭示了 3 种类型的关系：骚扰表现形式的同时出现、骚扰表现形式与对骚扰的反应之间的关系，以及对骚扰的反应与应对骚扰的方法之间的关系。
在所检查的群体中，发现 22%的人存在骚扰。研究揭示了存在 5 种骚扰表现形式的聚类（即，至少经历 1 种骚扰表现形式的受访者亚组）。在诊断出骚扰症状的人数最多的聚类中，工作条件不友好。在骚扰的背景下，人们更倾向于被动反应或使用人际关系应对方法。然而，他们很少向机构寻求帮助或对骚扰者使用攻击性。波兰医学杂志。2022；73（1）：1-12。
