Biophysics and Biomedical Modeling Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts, USA.
Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts, USA.
Physiol Rep. 2022 Feb;10(3):e15175. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15175.
The impact of acute mountain sickness (AMS) and sleep disturbances on mood and cognition at two altitudes relevant to the working and tourist population is unknown. Twenty unacclimatized lowlanders were exposed to either 3000 m (n = 10; 526 mmHg) or 4050 m (n = 10; 460 mmHg) for 20 h in a hypobaric chamber. AMS prevalence and severity was assessed using the Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire (ESQ) and an AMS-C score ≥ 0.7 indicated sickness. While sleeping for one night both at sea level (SL) and high altitude (HA), a wrist motion detector was used to measure awakenings (Awak, events/h) and sleep efficiency (Eff, %). If Eff was ≥85%, individuals were considered a good sleeper (Sleep+). Mood and cognition were assessed using the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metric and Mood Scale (ANAM-MS). The ESQ and ANAM-MS were administered in the morning both at SL and after 20 h at HA. AMS severity (mean ± SE; 1.82 ± 0.27 vs. 0.20 ± 0.27), AMS prevalence (90% vs. 10%), depression (0.63 ± 0.23 vs. 0.00 ± 0.24) Awak (15.6 ± 1.6 vs. 10.1 ± 1.6 events/h), and DeSHr (38.5 ± 6.3 vs. 13.3 ± 6.3 events/h) were greater (p < 0.05) and Eff was lower (69.9 ± 5.3% vs. 87.0 ± 5.3%) at 4050 m compared to 3000 m, respectively. AMS presence did not impact cognition but fatigue (2.17 ± 0.37 vs. 0.58 ± 0.39), anger (0.65 ± 0.25 vs. 0.02 ± 0.26), depression (0.63 ± 0.23 vs. 0.00 ± 0.24) and sleepiness (4.8 ± 0.4 vs. 2.7 ± 0.5) were greater (p < 0.05) in the AMS+ group. The Sleep- group, compared to the Sleep+ group, had lower (p < 0.05) working memory scores (50 ± 7 vs. 78 ± 9) assessed by the Sternberg 6-letter memory task, and lower reaction time fatigue scores (157 ± 17 vs. 221 ± 22), assessed by the repeated reaction time test. Overall, AMS, depression, DeSHr, and Awak were increased (p < 0.05) at 4050 m compared to 3000 m. In addition, AMS presence impacted mood while poor sleep impacted cognition which may deteriorate teamwork and/or increase errors in judgement at HA.
急性高原病(AMS)和睡眠障碍对与工作和旅游人群相关的两个海拔高度的情绪和认知的影响尚不清楚。20 名未经适应的低地人在减压舱中暴露于 3000 米(n=10;526mmHg)或 4050 米(n=10;460mmHg)20 小时。使用环境症状问卷(ESQ)评估 AMS 的患病率和严重程度,AMS-C 评分≥0.7 表示患病。在海平面(SL)和高海拔(HA)各睡一晚时,使用手腕运动探测器测量觉醒(Awak,事件/小时)和睡眠效率(Eff,%)。如果 Eff≥85%,则认为个体睡眠良好(Sleep+)。使用自动神经心理评估指标和情绪量表(ANAM-MS)评估情绪和认知。ESQ 和 ANAM-MS 在 SL 早晨和 HA 20 小时后早上进行。AMS 严重程度(平均值±SE;1.82±0.27 对 0.20±0.27)、AMS 患病率(90%对 10%)、抑郁(0.63±0.23 对 0.00±0.24)觉醒(15.6±1.6 对 10.1±1.6 事件/小时)和 DeSHr(38.5±6.3 对 13.3±6.3 事件/小时)在 4050 米处更高(p<0.05),效率更低(69.9±5.3%对 87.0±5.3%)与 3000 米相比。AMS 的存在并不影响认知,但疲劳(2.17±0.37 对 0.58±0.39)、愤怒(0.65±0.25 对 0.02±0.26)、抑郁(0.63±0.23 对 0.00±0.24)和嗜睡(4.8±0.4 对 2.7±0.5)在 AMS+组中更高(p<0.05)。与 Sleep+组相比,Sleep-组在 Sternberg 6 字母记忆任务中评估的工作记忆得分(50±7 对 78±9)和在重复反应时间测试中评估的反应时疲劳得分(157±17 对 221±22)更低(p<0.05)。总的来说,与 3000 米相比,4050 米处的 AMS、抑郁、DeSHr 和觉醒更高(p<0.05)。此外,AMS 的存在会影响情绪,而睡眠质量差会影响认知,这可能会在高海拔地区恶化团队合作和/或增加判断错误。