• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1992-2019 年期间柬埔寨洞里萨湖保护区的大规模森林净损失。

Large net forest loss in Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake protected areas during 1992-2019.

机构信息

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.

Regional Climate Group, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 460, 40530, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Ambio. 2022 Aug;51(8):1889-1903. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01704-4. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1007/s13280-022-01704-4
PMID:35133565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9200915/
Abstract

Historical land-use practices have caused forest loss in Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake area (TSLA), the largest freshwater lake in Southeast Asia. However, it remains unclear if this deforestation trend had continued since 2001 when the land was designated as protected areas. Using satellite imagery, we investigated forest conversion flows and fragmentation patterns in the TSLA for 1992-2001, 2001-2010, and 2010-2019, respectively. Results show substantial forest losses and fragmentations occurring at the lower floodplain where the protected areas are located until 2010, with some forest regain during 2010-2019. The land conversions indicated that forest clearing and agricultural farming were the primary causes for observed extensive forest loss during 1992-2010. Hence, despite the creating of protected areas in 2001, our findings reveal the persistence of alarming forest loss in the TSLA until 2010. On the other hand, while net forest loss has stopped after 2010, forest regain during 2010-2019 is way too small to restore the region's total forest area to even the level when the protected areas were established. Thus, more effective planning and implementations of forest management and restoration policies are needed for the TSLA.

摘要

历史上的土地利用方式导致柬埔寨洞里萨湖地区(TSLA)的森林丧失,该地区是东南亚最大的淡水湖。然而,自 2001 年该地区被指定为保护区以来,这种森林砍伐趋势是否还在继续,目前还不清楚。我们利用卫星图像,分别调查了 1992-2001 年、2001-2010 年和 2010-2019 年期间 TSLA 的森林转化流和破碎化模式。结果表明,在保护区所在的低洪泛平原上,大量的森林丧失和破碎化现象一直持续到 2010 年,而在 2010-2019 年期间,森林面积有所恢复。土地转化表明,森林砍伐和农业耕种是 1992-2010 年期间观察到的广泛森林丧失的主要原因。因此,尽管 2001 年设立了保护区,但我们的研究结果表明,直到 2010 年,TSLA 的森林仍在持续大量减少。另一方面,虽然 2010 年以后净森林损失已经停止,但 2010-2019 年期间的森林恢复量太小,不足以使该地区的森林总面积恢复到保护区建立时的水平。因此,TSLA 需要更有效的森林管理和恢复政策的规划和实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cf/9200915/4de736a9b89a/13280_2022_1704_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cf/9200915/765549b41227/13280_2022_1704_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cf/9200915/0a22b3ddfd6c/13280_2022_1704_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cf/9200915/0a2544a06371/13280_2022_1704_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cf/9200915/fde4cff56ba5/13280_2022_1704_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cf/9200915/fa04bd4de234/13280_2022_1704_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cf/9200915/4de736a9b89a/13280_2022_1704_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cf/9200915/765549b41227/13280_2022_1704_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cf/9200915/0a22b3ddfd6c/13280_2022_1704_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cf/9200915/0a2544a06371/13280_2022_1704_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cf/9200915/fde4cff56ba5/13280_2022_1704_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cf/9200915/fa04bd4de234/13280_2022_1704_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77cf/9200915/4de736a9b89a/13280_2022_1704_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Large net forest loss in Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake protected areas during 1992-2019.1992-2019 年期间柬埔寨洞里萨湖保护区的大规模森林净损失。
Ambio. 2022 Aug;51(8):1889-1903. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01704-4. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
2
Development of deforestation and land cover database for Bhutan (1930-2014).不丹森林砍伐和土地覆盖数据库的开发(1930 - 2014年)。
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Dec;188(12):658. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5676-6. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
3
20 years of landscape dynamics within the world's largest multinational network of protected areas.20 年来,世界上最大的跨国保护区网络内的景观动态变化。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111712. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111712. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
4
Quantifying changes in flooding and habitats in the Tonle Sap Lake (Cambodia) caused by water infrastructure development and climate change in the Mekong Basin.量化湄公河流域水基础设施开发和气候变化引起的洞里萨湖(柬埔寨)洪泛区和栖息地的变化。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Dec 15;112:53-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
5
Studying land use dynamics using decadal satellite images and Dyna-CLUE model in the Mahanadi River basin, India.利用十年期卫星图像和 Dyna-CLUE 模型研究印度马哈纳迪河流域的土地利用动态。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jan 27;191(Suppl 3):804. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7698-3.
6
Centennial dynamics of floodplain wetland in the largest freshwater lake in China: Implications on floodplain lake restoration.中国最大淡水湖洪泛平原湿地百年动态:对洪泛平原湖泊恢复的启示
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb 27;353:120192. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120192. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
7
Impact of the Mekong River flow alteration on the Tonle Sap flood pulse.湄公河流量变化对洞里萨湖洪水脉冲的影响。
Ambio. 2008 May;37(3):185-92. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[185:iotmrf]2.0.co;2.
8
Annotated checklist of freshwater molluscs from the largest freshwater lake in Southeast Asia.东南亚最大淡水湖淡水软体动物注释清单
Zookeys. 2020 Aug 11;958:107-141. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.958.53865. eCollection 2020.
9
Profiling dynamics of the Southeast Asia's largest lake, Tonle Sap Lake.剖析东南亚最大的湖泊——洞里萨湖的动态变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Mar 20;917:170444. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170444. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
10
Geospatial assessment and monitoring of historical forest cover changes (1920-2012) in Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, Western Ghats, India.印度西高止山脉尼勒姆生物保护区历史森林覆盖变化(1920-2012 年)的地理空间评估和监测。
Environ Monit Assess. 2014 Dec;186(12):8125-40. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3991-3. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Unravelling the link between global rubber price and tropical deforestation in Cambodia.揭示柬埔寨全球橡胶价格与热带森林砍伐之间的联系。
Nat Plants. 2019 Jan;5(1):47-53. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0325-4. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
2
Classifying drivers of global forest loss.全球森林损失的驱动因素分类。
Science. 2018 Sep 14;361(6407):1108-1111. doi: 10.1126/science.aau3445.
3
Hydro-dam - A nature-based solution or an ecological problem: The fate of the Tonlé Sap Lake.水电大坝——基于自然的解决方案还是生态问题:洞里萨湖的命运
Environ Res. 2017 Oct;158:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
4
Effects of habitat disturbance on tropical forest biodiversity.栖息地干扰对热带森林生物多样性的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 6;114(23):6056-6061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611855114. Epub 2017 May 1.
5
A small subset of protected areas are a highly significant source of carbon emissions.一小部分保护区是碳排放的重要来源。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 10;7:41902. doi: 10.1038/srep41902.
6
Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems.栖息地破碎化及其对地球生态系统的持久影响。
Sci Adv. 2015 Mar 20;1(2):e1500052. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500052. eCollection 2015 Mar.
7
China: Open access to Earth land-cover map.中国:地球土地覆盖图开放获取。
Nature. 2014 Oct 23;514(7523):434. doi: 10.1038/514434c.
8
A 50-m forest cover map in Southeast Asia from ALOS/PALSAR and its application on forest fragmentation assessment.利用ALOS/PALSAR绘制的东南亚50米森林覆盖图及其在森林破碎化评估中的应用。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e85801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085801. eCollection 2014.
9
High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change.高分辨率的 21 世纪全球森林覆盖变化地图集。
Science. 2013 Nov 15;342(6160):850-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1244693.
10
The flood pulse as the underlying driver of vegetation in the largest wetland and fishery of the Mekong Basin.洪泛脉冲是湄公河流域最大湿地和渔业的基础驱动因素。
Ambio. 2013 Nov;42(7):864-76. doi: 10.1007/s13280-013-0424-4. Epub 2013 Jul 23.