Zare Sakhvidi Mohammad Javad, Knobel Pablo, Bauwelinck Mariska, de Keijzer Carmen, Boll Lilian Marie, Spano Giuseppina, Ubalde-Lopez Monica, Sanesi Giovanni, Mehrparvar Amir Houshang, Jacquemin Bénédicte, Dadvand Payam
Occupational Health Department, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran; Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail) - UMR_S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Environment and Human Health Lab (EH2 Lab), Forest Science and Technology Center of Catalonia, Lleida, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jun 10;824:153608. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153608. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
We systematically reviewed the existing evidence (until end of November 2021) on the association between long-term exposure to greenspace and behavioral problems in children according to the PRISMA 2020. The review finally reached 29 relevant studies of which, 17 were cross-sectional, 11 were cohort, and one was a case-control. Most of the studies were conducted in Europe (n = 14), followed by the USA (n = 8), and mainly (n = 21) from 2015 onwards. The overall quality of the studies in terms of risk of bias was "fair" (mean quality score = 5.4 out of 9) according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Thirteen studies (45%) had good or very good quality in terms of risk of bias. The strength and difficulty questionnaire was the most common outcome assessment instrument. Exposure to the greenspace in the reviewed studies was characterized based on different indices (availability, accessibility, and quality), mostly at residential address locations. Association of exposure to different types of greenspace were reported for nine different behavioral outcomes including total behavioral difficulties (n = 16), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms and severity (n = 15), ADHD diagnosis (n = 10), conduct problems (n = 10), prosocial behavior (n = 10), emotional symptoms (n = 8), peer-relationship problems (n = 8), externalizing disorders (n = 6), and internalizing disorders (n = 5). Most of the reported associations (except for conduct problems) were suggestive of beneficial association of greenspace exposure with children's behaviors; however, the studies were heterogeneous in terms of their exposure indicators, study design, and the outcome definition.
我们根据PRISMA 2020系统回顾了(截至2021年11月底)长期接触绿地与儿童行为问题之间关联的现有证据。该综述最终纳入了29项相关研究,其中17项为横断面研究,11项为队列研究,1项为病例对照研究。大多数研究在欧洲进行(n = 14),其次是美国(n = 8),且主要(n = 21)是2015年以后开展的。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表,这些研究在偏倚风险方面的总体质量为“中等”(平均质量得分9分制下为5.4分)。13项研究(45%)在偏倚风险方面质量良好或非常好。强度和困难问卷是最常用的结局评估工具。纳入综述的研究中,对绿地接触情况是根据不同指标(可获得性、可达性和质量)来界定的,大多是在居住地址位置。报告了不同类型绿地接触与9种不同行为结局之间的关联,包括总体行为困难(n = 16)、注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)症状及严重程度(n = 15)、ADHD诊断(n = 10)、品行问题(n = 10)、亲社会行为(n = 10)、情绪症状(n = 8)、同伴关系问题(n = 8)、外化障碍(n = 6)和内化障碍(n = 5)。大多数报告的关联(品行问题除外)表明接触绿地对儿童行为有益;然而,这些研究在接触指标、研究设计和结局定义方面存在异质性。