Evolutionary Biology, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden.
Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University for Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 9;289(1968):20211633. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1633.
Epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modifications and non-coding RNAs are increasingly targeted in studies of natural populations. Here, I review some of the insights gained from this research, examine some of the methods currently in use and discuss some of the challenges that researchers working on natural populations are likely to face when probing epigenetic mechanisms. While studies supporting the involvement of epigenetic mechanisms in generating phenotypic variation in natural populations are amassing, many of these studies are currently correlative in nature. Thus, while empirical data point to widespread contributions of epigenetic mechanisms in generating phenotypic variation, there are still concerns as to whether epigenetic variation is instead ultimately controlled by genetic variation. Disentangling these two sources of variation will be a key to resolving the debate about the importance of epigenetic mechanisms, and studies on natural populations that partition the relative contribution of genetic and epigenetic factors to phenotypic variation can play an important role in this debate.
表观遗传机制,如 DNA 甲基化、组蛋白修饰和非编码 RNA,在自然种群的研究中越来越受到关注。在这里,我回顾了一些从这项研究中获得的见解,考察了目前使用的一些方法,并讨论了研究自然种群的研究人员在探究表观遗传机制时可能面临的一些挑战。虽然越来越多的研究支持表观遗传机制在自然种群中产生表型变异,但其中许多研究目前都是相关性的。因此,虽然实证数据表明表观遗传机制在产生表型变异方面有广泛的贡献,但仍有人担心表观遗传变异是否最终受遗传变异控制。解开这两种变异的来源将是解决关于表观遗传机制重要性的争论的关键,而对自然种群进行遗传和表观遗传因素对表型变异相对贡献进行划分的研究可以在这场争论中发挥重要作用。