Tursø-Finnich Thomas, Jensen Rune Overgaard, Jensen Lasse X, Konge Lars, Thinggaard Ebbe
From the Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (T.T.-F., L.K., E.T.), Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology (R.O.J.), University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense; Department of Public Health (L.X.J.) and Clinical Medicine (L.K.), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen; and Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (E.T.), Slagelse Hospital, Zealand, Denmark.
Simul Healthc. 2023 Feb 1;18(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000636. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
Simulation-based training using virtual reality head-mounted displays (VR-HMD) is increasingly being used within the field of medical education. This article systematically reviews and appraises the quality of the literature on the use of VR-HMDs in medical education. A search in the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PsychINFO was carried out. Studies were screened according to predefined exclusion criteria, and quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. In total, 41 articles were included and thematically divided into 5 groups: anatomy, procedural skills, surgical procedures, communication skills, and clinical decision making. Participants highly appreciated using VR-HMD and rated it better than most other training methods. Virtual reality head-mounted display outperformed traditional methods of learning surgical procedures. Although VR-HMD showed promising results when learning anatomy, it was not considered better than other available study materials. No conclusive findings could be synthesized regarding the remaining 3 groups.
使用虚拟现实头戴式显示器(VR-HMD)的基于模拟的培训在医学教育领域正越来越多地被使用。本文系统地回顾并评估了关于在医学教育中使用VR-HMD的文献质量。在PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、ERIC、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆和PsychINFO数据库中进行了检索。根据预先定义的排除标准对研究进行筛选,并使用医学教育研究质量工具评估质量。总共纳入了41篇文章,并按主题分为5组:解剖学、操作技能、外科手术、沟通技能和临床决策。参与者高度赞赏使用VR-HMD,并将其评价为优于大多数其他培训方法。虚拟现实头戴式显示器在学习外科手术方面优于传统学习方法。尽管VR-HMD在学习解剖学时显示出有希望的结果,但它并不被认为比其他可用的学习材料更好。关于其余3组,无法得出结论性的结果。