Selection of treatment regimens based on shared decision-making in patients with rheumatoid arthritis on remission in the FREE-J study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcome of various treatment de-escalation regimens in patients with RA who achieved sustained remission.

METHODS

At period 1, 436 RA patients who were treated with MTX and bDMARDs and had maintained DAS28(ESR) at <2.6 were divided into five groups based on shared patient/physician decision-making; continuation, dose reduction and discontinuation of MTX or bDMARDs. At end of year 1, patients who achieved DAS28(ESR) <3.2 were allowed to enrol in period 2 for treatment using the de-escalation regimens for another year. The primary and secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with DAS28(ESR) <2.6 at year 1 and 2, respectively.

RESULTS

Based on shared decision-making, 81.4% elected de-escalation of treatment and 48.4% selected de-escalation of MTX. At end of period 1, similar proportions of patients maintained DAS28(ESR) <2.6 (continuation, 85.2%; MTX dose reduction, 79.0%; MTX-discontinuation, 80.0%; bDMARD dose reduction, 73.9%), although the rate was significantly different between the continuation and bDMARD-discontinuation. At end of period 2, similar proportions of patients of the MTX groups maintained DAS28(ESR) <2.6 (continuation or de-escalation), but the rates were significantly lower in the bDMARD-discontinuation group. However, half of the latter group satisfactorily discontinued bDMARDs. Adverse events were numerically lower in MTX and bDMARD-de-escalation groups during period 1 and 2, compared with the continuation group.

CONCLUSIONS

After achieving sustained remission by combination treatment of MTX/bDMARDs, disease control was achieved comparably by continuation, dose reduction or discontinuation of MTX and dose reduction of bDMARDs at end of year 1. Subsequent de-escalation of MTX had no impacts on disease control but decreased adverse events in year 2.