Public Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Can J Public Health. 2022 Jun;113(3):341-362. doi: 10.17269/s41997-021-00602-8. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
The aim of this study was to describe sugary drink (beverages with free sugars), sugar-sweetened beverage (beverages with added sugars, SSB) and 100% juice (beverages with natural sugars) consumption across socioeconomic position (SEP) among Canadians.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 19,742 respondents of single-day 24-h dietary recalls in the nationally representative 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition. Poisson regressions were used to estimate the prevalence of consuming each beverage type on a given day. Among consumers on a given day, linear regressions were used to estimate mean energy intake. Models included household education, food security and income quintiles as separate unadjusted exposures. Sex-specific models were estimated separately for children/adolescents (2-18 years) and adults (19 +).
Among female children/adolescents, the prevalence of consuming sugary drinks and, separately, SSB ranged from 11 to 21 and 8 to 27 percentage-points higher among lower education compared to 'Bachelor degree or above' households. In female adults, the prevalence of consuming sugary drinks and, separately, SSB was 10 (95% CI: 1, 19) and 14 (95% CI: 2, 27) percentage-points higher in food insecure compared to secure households. In males, the prevalence of consuming 100% juice was 9 (95% CI: - 18, 0) percentage-points lower among food insecure compared to secure households. Social inequities in energy intake were observed in female adult consumers, among whom mean energy from sugary drinks was 27 kcal (95% CI: 3, 51) higher among food insecure compared to secure and 35 kcal (95% CI: 2, 67) higher from 100% juice among 'less than high school' education compared to 'Bachelor degree or above' households.
Social inequities in sugary drink consumption exist in Canada. The associations differed by SEP indicator. Equitable interventions to reduce consumption are warranted.
本研究旨在描述加拿大不同社会经济地位(SEP)人群的含糖饮料(含游离糖的饮料)、含糖饮料(添加糖的饮料,SSB)和 100%果汁(含天然糖的饮料)的消费情况。
我们对全国代表性的 2015 年加拿大社区健康调查-营养中的 19742 名单日 24 小时膳食回忆的受访者进行了横断面分析。使用泊松回归估计给定日每种饮料类型的消费流行率。在给定日的消费者中,使用线性回归估计平均能量摄入量。模型包括家庭教育、食品安全和收入五分位数作为单独的未调整暴露因素。针对儿童/青少年(2-18 岁)和成年人(19+岁)分别估计了性别特异性模型。
在女性儿童/青少年中,与“学士学位或以上”家庭相比,较低教育家庭中含糖饮料和 SSB 的消费流行率分别高出 11-21 和 8-27 个百分点。在女性成年人中,与食品安全家庭相比,不安全家庭中含糖饮料和 SSB 的消费流行率分别高出 10(95%CI:1,19)和 14(95%CI:2,27)个百分点。在男性中,与食品安全家庭相比,不安全家庭中 100%果汁的消费流行率低 9(95%CI:-18,0)个百分点。在女性成年消费者中观察到能量摄入的社会不平等现象,其中不安全家庭中含糖饮料的平均能量摄入比安全家庭高 27 千卡(95%CI:3,51),而“高中以下”教育家庭中 100%果汁的平均能量摄入比“学士学位或以上”家庭高 35 千卡(95%CI:2,67)。
加拿大存在含糖饮料消费的社会不平等现象。这些关联因 SEP 指标而异。需要采取公平的干预措施来减少消费。