• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对句子句法歧义的瞳孔反应。

Pupillary responses to syntactic ambiguity of sentences.

作者信息

Schluroff M, Zimmermann T E, Freeman R B, Hofmeister K, Lorscheid T, Weber A

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1986 Mar;27(2):322-44. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(86)90023-4.

DOI:10.1016/0093-934x(86)90023-4
PMID:3513899
Abstract

Pupillary responses have proven to be reliable physiological correlates of cognitive effort in a variety of tasks, including language processing. To investigate the relation between psychological and syntactic complexity 20 syntactically ambiguous sentences, balanced for bias, were presented to 16 subjects, while their pupil size was continuously measured. These sentences could be read as verb oriented (syntactically more complex) or object oriented (syntactically less complex). Principal components analysis of pupillary movements revealed that verb-oriented readings, resulted in greater pupillary dilations than object-oriented readings, indicating that syntactically more complex sentences, as determined via a formal grammar, require greater cognitive effort in processing. This is viewed as further evidence for the notion that syntactic and psychological complexity are related. High- and low-bias sentences did not induce comparable differences in pupillary movements, indicating that the "multiple meaning theory" may have to be modified.

摘要

瞳孔反应已被证明是包括语言处理在内的各种任务中认知努力的可靠生理关联指标。为了研究心理复杂性和句法复杂性之间的关系,向16名受试者呈现了20个句法歧义句,这些句子在偏向性上保持平衡,同时持续测量他们的瞳孔大小。这些句子既可以被解读为动词导向(句法更复杂),也可以被解读为宾语导向(句法较不复杂)。对瞳孔运动的主成分分析表明,动词导向的解读比宾语导向的解读会导致更大的瞳孔扩张,这表明通过形式语法确定的句法更复杂的句子在处理时需要更大的认知努力。这被视为句法和心理复杂性相关这一观点的进一步证据。高偏向性和低偏向性的句子在瞳孔运动上并未引发可比的差异,这表明“多重意义理论”可能需要修正。

相似文献

1
Pupillary responses to syntactic ambiguity of sentences.对句子句法歧义的瞳孔反应。
Brain Lang. 1986 Mar;27(2):322-44. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(86)90023-4.
2
Pupillary dynamics reveal computational cost in sentence planning.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(6):1041-52. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.911925. Epub 2014 May 6.
3
Pupil Dilation Response to Prosody and Syntax During Auditory Sentence Processing.听觉句子处理过程中瞳孔对韵律和句法的扩张反应。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Feb;52(1):153-177. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09830-y. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
4
Syntactic complexity and ambiguity resolution in a free word order language: behavioral and electrophysiological evidences from Basque.一种词序自由语言中的句法复杂性与歧义消解:来自巴斯克语的行为和电生理证据
Brain Lang. 2009 Apr;109(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
5
Syntactic ambiguity resolution in dyslexia: An examination of cognitive factors underlying eye movement differences and comprehension failures.阅读障碍中的句法歧义解决:对眼动差异和理解障碍背后认知因素的考察。
Dyslexia. 2019 May;25(2):115-141. doi: 10.1002/dys.1613. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
6
Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences.为什么会这样?在一个非常大的英语句子语料库中的结构预测和歧义消解。
Cognition. 2006 Jan;98(3):245-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.008.
7
Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production - an online study.口语句子生成中的句法启动——一项在线研究。
Cognition. 2001 Feb;78(2):123-64. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00110-4.
8
The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences.非规范句子的误解。
Cogn Psychol. 2003 Sep;47(2):164-203. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00005-7.
9
Expecting Questions Modulates Cognitive Effort in a Syntactic Processing Task: Evidence From Pupillometry.期待问题调节句法加工任务中的认知努力:瞳孔测量的证据。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Jan 14;64(1):121-133. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00071. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
10
The effect of phonemic repetition on syntactic ambiguity resolution: implications for models of working memory.音素重复对句法歧义消解的影响:对工作记忆模型的启示
J Psycholinguist Res. 2004 Nov;33(6):493-516. doi: 10.1007/s10936-004-2668-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between Behavioral and Objective Measures of Sound Intensity in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Hearing-Aid Users: A Pilot Study.听力正常者和助听器使用者声音强度的行为测量与客观测量之间的关系:一项初步研究。
Brain Sci. 2022 Mar 15;12(3):392. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12030392.
2
Publication guidelines and recommendations for pupillary measurement in psychophysiological studies.瞳孔测量在心理生理学研究中的发表指南和建议。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Apr;59(4):e14035. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14035.
3
Measuring Collaboration Load With Pupillary Responses - Implications for the Design of Instructions in Task-Oriented HRI.
利用瞳孔反应测量协作负荷——对面向任务的人机交互中指令设计的启示
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 20;12:623657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623657. eCollection 2021.
4
PupilEXT: Flexible Open-Source Platform for High-Resolution Pupillometry in Vision Research.瞳孔扩展技术(PupilEXT):用于视觉研究中高分辨率瞳孔测量的灵活开源平台。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Jun 18;15:676220. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.676220. eCollection 2021.
5
Cortical modulation of pupillary function: systematic review.瞳孔功能的皮质调节:系统评价
PeerJ. 2019 May 7;7:e6882. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6882. eCollection 2019.
6
Analyzing the Time Course of Pupillometric Data.分析瞳孔测量数据的时程。
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519832483. doi: 10.1177/2331216519832483.
7
Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started.使用瞳孔测量法测量听力努力的最佳实践和建议:入门指南。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518800869. doi: 10.1177/2331216518800869.
8
Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.耳目一新:运用眼动追踪和瞳孔测量技术理解言语识别障碍。
Hear Res. 2018 Nov;369:56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 May 4.
9
A Novel Pupillometric Method for Indexing Word Difficulty in Individuals With and Without Aphasia.一种用于评估失语症患者和非失语症患者单词难度的新型瞳孔测量方法。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Oct;58(5):1508-20. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0287.
10
Pupillary responses during a joint attention task are associated with nonverbal cognitive abilities and sub-clinical symptoms of autism.在共同注意任务期间的瞳孔反应与非言语认知能力及自闭症的亚临床症状相关。
Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2014 Jun 1;8(6):644-653. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.03.003.