• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分布狭窄的分类单元对保护规划具有不成比例的信息价值。

Narrowly distributed taxa are disproportionately informative for conservation planning.

机构信息

Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-8509, Japan.

School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 9;12(1):2229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03119-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-03119-9
PMID:35140248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8828766/
Abstract

Biological atlas data can be used as inputs into conservation decision-making, yet atlases are sometimes infrequently updated, which can be problematic when the distribution of species is changing rapidly. Despite this, we have a poor understanding of strategies for efficiently updating biological atlas data. Using atlases of the distributions of 1630 threatened plant taxa, we quantitatively compared the informativeness of narrowly distributed and widespread taxa in identifying areas that meet taxon-specific conservation targets, and also measured the cost-efficiency of meeting those targets. We also explored the underlying mechanisms of the informativeness of narrowly distributed taxa. Overall, narrowly distributed taxa are far more informative than widespread taxa for identifying areas that efficiently meet conservation targets, while their informativeness for identifying cost-efficient areas varied depending on the type of conservation target. Narrowly distributed taxa are informative mainly because their distributions disproportionately capture areas that are either relatively taxon rich or taxon poor, and because of larger number of taxa captured with given number of records. Where resources for updating biological data are limited, a focus on areas supporting many narrowly distributed taxa could benefit conservation planning.

摘要

生物图谱数据可作为保护决策的输入,但图谱的更新有时并不频繁,而当物种分布迅速变化时,这可能会产生问题。尽管如此,我们对有效更新生物图谱数据的策略仍了解甚少。本研究使用了 1630 种受威胁植物类群分布图谱,定量比较了分布范围狭窄和广泛的类群在确定符合特定类群保护目标的区域方面的信息量,并衡量了实现这些目标的成本效益。我们还探讨了分布范围狭窄类群信息量的潜在机制。总体而言,对于确定高效满足保护目标的区域,分布范围狭窄的类群远比分布范围广泛的类群更具信息量,而其对于确定成本效益高的区域的信息量则取决于保护目标的类型。分布范围狭窄的类群具有信息量,主要是因为它们的分布不成比例地捕获了相对丰富或相对稀少的物种区域,并且由于使用给定数量的记录捕获了更多的类群。在更新生物数据的资源有限的情况下,关注支持大量分布范围狭窄的类群的区域可能会有益于保护规划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2197/8828766/98ecdc68ac91/41598_2021_3119_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2197/8828766/270c571f6a7e/41598_2021_3119_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2197/8828766/bf4c5ff51b73/41598_2021_3119_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2197/8828766/98ecdc68ac91/41598_2021_3119_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2197/8828766/270c571f6a7e/41598_2021_3119_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2197/8828766/bf4c5ff51b73/41598_2021_3119_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2197/8828766/98ecdc68ac91/41598_2021_3119_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Narrowly distributed taxa are disproportionately informative for conservation planning.分布狭窄的分类单元对保护规划具有不成比例的信息价值。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 9;12(1):2229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03119-9.
2
The effectiveness of surrogate taxa for the representation of biodiversity.替代分类单元在生物多样性代表性方面的有效性。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Oct;24(5):1367-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01513.x.
3
Biogeographical concordance and efficiency of taxon indicators for establishing conservation priority in a tropical rainforest biota.生物地理学一致性与分类群指标在确定热带雨林生物区保护优先级方面的效率
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Sep 22;268(1479):1875-81. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1713.
4
Extinction risk of narrowly distributed species of seed plants in Brazil due to habitat loss and climate change.巴西狭域分布种子植物因栖息地丧失和气候变化面临的灭绝风险。
PeerJ. 2019 Jul 22;7:e7333. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7333. eCollection 2019.
5
Use of cross-taxon congruence for hotspot identification at a regional scale.利用跨分类群一致性在区域尺度上识别热点。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e40018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040018. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
6
Unravelling biodiversity, evolution and threats to conservation in the Sahara-Sahel.揭示撒哈拉-萨赫勒地区生物多样性、进化以及对保护的威胁。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2014 Feb;89(1):215-31. doi: 10.1111/brv.12049. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
7
Influence of a threatened-species focus on conservation planning.受威胁物种关注对保护规划的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Apr;24(2):441-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01346.x. Epub 2009 Oct 16.
8
Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategy.作为生物多样性指标策略的互补性
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Mar 7;267(1442):505-13. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1029.
9
Phylogenetically informed spatial planning as a tool to prioritise areas for threatened plant conservation within a Mediterranean biodiversity hotspot.基于系统发育的空间规划作为一种工具,用于优先考虑地中海生物多样性热点地区受威胁植物保护的区域。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 15;665:1046-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.127. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
10
Selective‐logging and oil palm: multitaxon impacts, biodiversity indicators, and trade‐offs for conservation planning.选择性采伐和油棕:多物种种群影响、生物多样性指标以及保护规划的权衡取舍。
Ecol Appl. 2014;24(8):2029-49.

本文引用的文献

1
Exact integer linear programming solvers outperform simulated annealing for solving conservation planning problems.精确整数线性规划求解器在解决保护规划问题方面比模拟退火算法表现更优。
PeerJ. 2020 May 27;8:e9258. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9258. eCollection 2020.
2
Tradeoffs in the value of biodiversity feature and cost data in conservation prioritization.权衡生物多样性特征和成本数据在保护优先级中的价值。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 4;9(1):15921. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52241-2.
3
Rarity-weighted richness: a simple and reliable alternative to integer programming and heuristic algorithms for minimum set and maximum coverage problems in conservation planning.
稀有度加权丰富度:一种用于保护规划中最小集和最大覆盖问题的简单可靠的整数规划和启发式算法替代方法。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 17;10(3):e0119905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119905. eCollection 2015.
4
Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning.系统保护规划中空间优先化的核心概念。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013 May;88(2):443-64. doi: 10.1111/brv.12008. Epub 2012 Dec 22.
5
Distorted views of biodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data.生物多样性的扭曲观点:物种出现数据中的时空偏差。
PLoS Biol. 2010 Jun 1;8(6):e1000385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000385.
6
A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions.对岛屿和大陆地区特有性和物种丰富度的全球评估。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 9;106(23):9322-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810306106. Epub 2009 May 21.
7
The coincidence of climatic and species rarity: high risk to small-range species from climate change.气候与物种稀有性的巧合:气候变化对小范围分布物种构成高风险。
Biol Lett. 2008 Oct 23;4(5):568-72. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0097.
8
Integrating economic costs into conservation planning.将经济成本纳入保护规划。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Dec;21(12):681-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003. Epub 2006 Oct 16.
9
Data requirements and data sources for biodiversity priority area selection.生物多样性优先区域选择的数据要求和数据来源。
J Biosci. 2002 Jul;27(4 Suppl 2):327-38. doi: 10.1007/BF02704963.
10
Following Africa's lead in setting priorities.效仿非洲在确定优先事项方面的做法。
Nature. 2000 May 25;405(6785):393-4. doi: 10.1038/35013249.