Vergeer Laura, Ahmed Mavra, Vanderlee Lana, Mulligan Christine, Weippert Madyson, Franco-Arellano Beatriz, Dickinson Kacie, Bernstein Jodi T, Labonté Marie-Ève, L'Abbé Mary R
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Centre nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels, École de nutrition, Université Laval, Pavillon des Services, 2440 boul. Hochelaga, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;22(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12683-2.
Food companies shape Canada's food supply through voluntary actions and commitments concerning product (re)formulation; however, the extent that these initiatives translate into actual improvements in nutritional quality is unclear. This study examined changes in the nutritional quality of products offered by the top 22 packaged food and beverage companies in Canada from 2013 to 2017, in relation to the strength of their product (re) formulation actions and commitments.
The Food Company Reformulation (FCR) scoring tool was used to quantify the strength of companies' reported recent actions and commitments to reduce energy and nutrients of concern in their products, with higher scores signifying stronger voluntary actions/commitments. Nutritional information for products was sourced from the University of Toronto FLIP 2013 (n = 6490) and 2017 (n = 8277) databases (n = 4074 matched products). Changes in product healthfulness were assessed using the Health Star Rating (HSR) system (with higher HSRs denoting healthier products) and calories, sodium, saturated fat, trans fat, and total and free sugar levels per 100 g/mL. Generalized estimating equations examined changes in nutritional quality in relation to FCR scores.
Overall, mean HSRs increased significantly for 5 companies' product portfolios and were reduced in 1 company's product portfolio. There were significant reductions in calories, sodium, saturated fat in 2 companies' portfolios and increases in 4, 3, and 8 companies' portfolios, respectively. Trans fats increased significantly in 2 companies' portfolios. Total and free sugars decreased significantly in 4 and 5 companies' portfolios, respectively, and increased in 1 company's portfolio. There was little change in the healthfulness of matched products. Higher FCR scores were not associated with greater increases in HSRs, or reductions in calories or nutrient amounts. FCR scores were negatively associated with HSRs and positively associated with total and free sugars. No relationship was observed between FCR scores and calories, sodium, saturated fat or trans fat.
Reporting stronger voluntary product (re) formulation actions and commitments was not associated with greater improvements in the healthfulness of products offered by Canada's leading packaged food and beverage companies from 2013 to 2017, suggesting a need for stronger industry initiatives or mandatory government interventions to improve the healthfulness of the food supply.
食品公司通过有关产品(重新)配方的自愿行动和承诺来塑造加拿大的食品供应;然而,这些举措在多大程度上转化为营养质量的实际改善尚不清楚。本研究调查了2013年至2017年加拿大22家顶级包装食品和饮料公司所提供产品的营养质量变化,以及它们产品(重新)配方行动和承诺的力度。
使用食品公司配方改革(FCR)评分工具来量化公司报告的近期减少其产品中令人关注的能量和营养素的行动及承诺的力度,分数越高表明自愿行动/承诺越强。产品的营养信息来自多伦多大学2013年(n = 6490)和2017年(n = 8277)的FLIP数据库(n = 4074种匹配产品)。使用健康星级评定(HSR)系统(HSR越高表示产品越健康)以及每100克/毫升的卡路里、钠、饱和脂肪、反式脂肪、总糖和游离糖水平来评估产品健康度的变化。广义估计方程研究了与FCR分数相关的营养质量变化。
总体而言,5家公司的产品组合的平均HSR显著增加,1家公司的产品组合的平均HSR降低。2家公司产品组合中的卡路里、钠、饱和脂肪显著减少,分别有4家、3家、8家公司产品组合中的卡路里、钠、饱和脂肪增加。2家公司产品组合中的反式脂肪显著增加。4家公司产品组合中的总糖和5家公司产品组合中的游离糖显著减少,1家公司产品组合中的总糖和游离糖增加。匹配产品的健康度变化不大。较高的FCR分数与HSR的更大增加、卡路里或营养素含量的减少无关。FCR分数与HSR呈负相关,与总糖和游离糖呈正相关。未观察到FCR分数与卡路里、钠、饱和脂肪或反式脂肪之间的关系。
报告更强的自愿产品(重新)配方行动和承诺与2013年至2017年加拿大领先的包装食品和饮料公司所提供产品的健康度的更大改善无关,这表明需要更强有力的行业举措或政府强制干预来提高食品供应的健康度。