Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
EPPI-Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London WC1H 0NR, UK.
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 14;16(20):3484. doi: 10.3390/nu16203484.
: Low quality diets are a risk factor for non-communicable diseases; therefore, improving diet quality is a public health and policy priority in the UK and elsewhere. Reformulating food/beverage products to make them healthier may be an effective approach. Evidence suggests that fiscal interventions, notably taxes/levies on soft drinks, can lead to reformulation but the evidence for voluntary or mandated non-fiscal interventions is less clear. We aimed to review and synthesise contemporary evidence to determine whether non-fiscal policies/interventions result in the reformulation of food/beverage products : In April 2023, we systematically searched ten international academic and nine grey literature databases. We included real-world study designs, all nutrients, in- and out-of-home sectors, and studies published from 2013, to ensure policy relevancy. We excluded modelling studies. Using the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis method we conducted vote counting of studies based on the direction of effect and narrative synthesis by intervention type. Risk of bias was assessed using a tool developed by the EPPI-Centre and quality was assessed using GRADE. : We included 77 real-world studies from 19 countries, reporting 100 non-fiscal policies/interventions. Most commonly, these were reduction targets ( = 44), front-of-pack labels ( = 23), and advertising standards ( = 9). Most interventions were voluntary ( = 67), compared to mandatory ( = 33), and focused on the in-home sector ( = 63). The vote counting results showed non-fiscal policies/interventions overall led to improvements in reformulation in 60/63 studies with a valid direction of effect (95%, 95% CI 0.869, 0.984, < 0.001). Mandatory implementations were more successful than voluntary implementations with 15/15 showing an improvement (100%, 95% CI 0.796, 1], < 0.001), compared 40/43 showing an improvement (93%, 95% CI 0.814, 0.976, < 0.001). Most of the studies were of low quality, due to the observational nature of the studies. Sodium was the most commonly targeted nutrient ( = 56) and was found to be reformulated in most studies. Causation is difficult to establish from real-world studies, but evidence suggests that regulatory and multi-component strategies may be effective at driving reformulation. Non-fiscal policies/interventions can play an important role in driving reformulation, alongside fiscal measures. This work was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research PRP-PRU-02-15-Healthy Weight and registered on Open Science Framework.
低质量的饮食是引发非传染性疾病的一个风险因素;因此,改善饮食质量是英国和其他国家的公共卫生和政策重点。对食品/饮料产品进行配方调整以使其更健康可能是一种有效的方法。有证据表明,财政干预措施,特别是对软饮料征收的税收/收费,可以促使产品配方进行调整,但关于自愿或强制实施非财政干预措施的证据则不太明确。我们旨在对现有证据进行综述和综合分析,以确定非财政政策/干预措施是否会导致食品/饮料产品的配方调整:2023 年 4 月,我们系统地检索了 10 个国际学术数据库和 9 个灰色文献数据库。我们纳入了真实世界的研究设计、所有营养素、家庭内外部门以及 2013 年以后发表的研究,以确保政策相关性。我们排除了模型研究。使用无荟萃分析方法,我们根据干预类型的效果方向和叙述性综合进行了研究的投票计数。使用 EPPI-Centre 开发的工具评估偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 评估质量。我们纳入了来自 19 个国家的 77 项真实世界研究,报告了 100 项非财政政策/干预措施。最常见的是,这些措施是减少目标(=44)、包装正面标签(=23)和广告标准(=9)。大多数干预措施是自愿的(=67),而强制性的(=33),且主要集中在家庭内部部门(=63)。投票计数结果显示,非财政政策/干预措施总体上导致了 63 项具有有效效果方向的研究(95%置信区间 0.869,0.984,<0.001)中 60/63 项的配方调整得到了改善。与 43 项显示出改善(93%,95%置信区间 0.814,0.976,<0.001)的 4 项相比,强制性实施比自愿实施更成功(100%,95%置信区间 0.796,1],<0.001)。由于研究的观察性质,大多数研究的质量较低。被研究最多的营养素是钠(=56),且大多数研究都发现钠被调整了配方。从真实世界的研究中很难确定因果关系,但有证据表明,监管和多组分策略可能有效地推动配方调整。非财政政策/干预措施可以在推动配方调整方面发挥重要作用,与财政措施相辅相成。这项工作得到了英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所 PRP-PRU-02-15-健康体重计划的资助,并在开放科学框架上注册。