Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, 200025, Shanghai, China.
Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Clinical Trial Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, 200025, Shanghai, China.
Lipids Health Dis. 2022 Feb 10;21(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12944-022-01628-8.
Current guidelines for dyslipidemia management recommend that the LDL-C goal be lower than 70 mg/dL. The present study investigated the prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability in LDL-C, and minimum and maximum LDL-C during follow-up in diabetes mellitus.
The risk of outcomes in relation to visit-to-visit LDL-C variability was investigated in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Lipid trial. LDL-C variability indices were coefficient of variation (CV), variability independent of the mean (VIM), and average real variability (ARV). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were employed to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
Compared with the placebo group (n=2667), the fenofibrate therapy group (n=2673) had a significantly (P<0.01) lower mean plasma triglyceride (152.5 vs. 178.6 mg/dL), and total cholesterol (158.3 vs.162.9 mg/dL) but a similar mean LDL-C during follow-up (88.2 vs. 88.6 mg/dL, P>0.05). All three variability indices were associated with primary outcome, total mortality and cardiovascular mortality both in the total population and in the fenofibrate therapy group but only with primary outcome in the placebo group. The minimum LDL-C but not the maximum during follow-up was significantly associated with various outcomes in the total population, fenofibrate therapy and placebo group. The minimum LDL-C during follow-up ≥70 mg/dL was associated with an increased risk for various outcomes.
Visit-to-visit variability in LDL-C was a strong predictor of outcomes, independent of mean LDL-C. Patients with LDL-C controlled to less than 70 mg/dL during follow-up might have a benign prognosis. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00000620.
目前的血脂异常管理指南建议 LDL-C 目标值应低于 70mg/dL。本研究探讨了糖尿病患者随访期间 LDL-C 变异性、最低和最高 LDL-C 的预后意义。
在控制心血管风险行动(ACCORD)脂质试验中,研究了 LDL-C 变异性与预后的关系。LDL-C 变异性指标包括变异系数(CV)、均值独立变异(VIM)和平均真实变异(ARV)。采用多变量 Cox 比例风险模型估计调整后的危险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
与安慰剂组(n=2667)相比,非诺贝特治疗组(n=2673)的平均血浆甘油三酯(152.5 与 178.6mg/dL)和总胆固醇(158.3 与 162.9mg/dL)明显降低(P<0.01),但随访期间的平均 LDL-C 相似(88.2 与 88.6mg/dL,P>0.05)。在总人群和非诺贝特治疗组中,所有三种变异性指标均与主要结局、全因死亡率和心血管死亡率相关,但仅在安慰剂组中与主要结局相关。在总人群、非诺贝特治疗组和安慰剂组中,随访期间的最低 LDL-C 而不是最大 LDL-C 与各种结局显著相关。随访期间最低 LDL-C≥70mg/dL 与各种结局的风险增加相关。
LDL-C 的变异性是预后的一个强有力预测因素,独立于平均 LDL-C。随访期间 LDL-C 控制在 70mg/dL 以下的患者可能具有良性预后。临床试验编号:NCT00000620。