Alderson-Day Ben, Moffatt Jamie, Lima César F, Krishnan Saloni, Fernyhough Charles, Scott Sophie K, Denton Sophie, Leong Ivy Yi Ting, Oncel Alena D, Wu Yu-Lin, Gurbuz Zehra, Evans Samuel
Neurosci Conscious. 2022 Feb 1;2022(1):niac002. doi: 10.1093/nc/niac002. eCollection 2022.
Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs)-or hearing voices-occur in clinical and non-clinical populations, but their mechanisms remain unclear. Predictive processing models of psychosis have proposed that hallucinations arise from an over-weighting of prior expectations in perception. It is unknown, however, whether this reflects (i) a sensitivity to explicit modulation of prior knowledge or (ii) a pre-existing tendency to spontaneously use such knowledge in ambiguous contexts. Four experiments were conducted to examine this question in healthy participants listening to ambiguous speech stimuli. In experiments 1a ( = 60) and 1b ( = 60), participants discriminated intelligible and unintelligible sine-wave speech before and after exposure to the original language templates (i.e. a modulation of expectation). No relationship was observed between top-down modulation and two common measures of hallucination-proneness. Experiment 2 ( = 99) confirmed this pattern with a different stimulus-sine-vocoded speech (SVS)-that was designed to minimize ceiling effects in discrimination and more closely model previous top-down effects reported in psychosis. In Experiment 3 ( = 134), participants were exposed to SVS without prior knowledge that it contained speech (i.e. naïve listening). AVH-proneness significantly predicted both pre-exposure identification of speech and successful recall for words hidden in SVS, indicating that participants could actually decode the hidden signal spontaneously. Altogether, these findings support a pre-existing tendency to spontaneously draw upon prior knowledge in healthy people prone to AVH, rather than a sensitivity to temporary modulations of expectation. We propose a model of clinical and non-clinical hallucinations, across auditory and visual modalities, with testable predictions for future research.
听幻觉(AVHs)——即幻听——在临床和非临床人群中均有出现,但其机制仍不清楚。精神病的预测性加工模型提出,幻觉源于感知中先验期望的过度加权。然而,尚不清楚这是反映了(i)对先验知识明确调制的敏感性,还是(ii)在模糊情境中自发使用此类知识的预先存在的倾向。进行了四项实验,以在聆听模糊语音刺激的健康参与者中研究这个问题。在实验1a(n = 60)和1b(n = 60)中,参与者在接触原始语言模板(即期望的调制)之前和之后,辨别可理解和不可理解的正弦波语音。自上而下的调制与两种常见的幻觉倾向测量之间未观察到关系。实验2(n = 99)用不同的刺激——正弦波编码语音(SVS)——证实了这一模式,该刺激旨在最小化辨别中的天花板效应,并更紧密地模拟先前在精神病中报道的自上而下效应。在实验3(n = 134)中,参与者在没有事先知道其包含语音的情况下接触SVS(即天真聆听)。幻觉倾向显著预测了接触前对语音的识别以及对隐藏在SVS中的单词的成功回忆,表明参与者实际上可以自发解码隐藏信号。总之,这些发现支持了在易患听幻觉的健康人中预先存在的自发利用先验知识的倾向,而不是对期望的临时调制的敏感性。我们提出了一个临床和非临床幻觉的模型,涵盖听觉和视觉模态,并为未来研究提供了可测试的预测。