Comparing the standard surgical dressing with dehydrated amnion and platelet-derived growth factor dressings in the healing rate of diabetic foot ulcer: A randomized clinical trial.

AIMS

The management of diabetic foot ulcers is a challenging issue due to the pathophysiological background, delay in healing, and prevalence of diabetes. The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of the three methods of diabetic wound care: surgical debridement and dressing, dressing with dehydrated amnion powder, and dressing with platelet-derived growth factor gel.

METHODS

In this multi-arm parallel-group randomized trial, 243 patients with a minimum 4-week medical history of diabetic foot ulcers with Wagner's grades 1 and 2, no infection, and adequate tissue blood flow were randomly assigned to one of three 81-person groups: surgical debridement (the standard method), dehydrated amnion dressing, or platelet-derived growth factor dressing. The follow-up period lasted 12 weeks. The percentage area reduction (PAR) was measured as the final target. SPSS version 25 was used to perform statistical analysis on the data.

RESULTS

All three study groups were comparable in terms of the type of ulcer, the area of ulcer, Wagner's grade, the period, and the ulcer's size. The PAR in the surgical debridement, platelet-derived growth factor, and dehydrated amnion groups were 7.4%, 14.8%, and 49.3% in week 4; 20.1%, 35.8%, and 79% in week 6; 43.7%, 56.8%, 86.4% in week 8; and 50%, 61.7%, and 87.6% in weeks 10 and 12, respectively. The observed differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05) over the entire period.

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that dehydrated amnion dressing, when compared to platelet-derived growth factor dressing and surgical debridement, resulted in better-improved healing in diabetic foot ulcer patients.