Suppr超能文献

一项与非法药物驾驶相关因素的系统性回顾。

A systematic review of factors associated with illegal drug driving.

机构信息

Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety- Queensland (CARRS-Q), K Block, 130 Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia.

Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety- Queensland (CARRS-Q), K Block, 130 Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Apr;168:106574. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106574. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

Abstract

Drug driving is a serious problem worldwide that can increase the risk of road crashes. This systematic review seeks to identify factors associated with drug driving (i.e., driving after consuming drugs other than alcohol) to highlight gaps in existing knowledge and inform the design of more effective countermeasures. A search of the literature was conducted for the period January 1, 2005 to July 31, 2021 using six different databases. The search protocol followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (#CRD42021234616). Studies that met inclusion criteria compared drug drivers with either non-drug drivers, alcohol-only drivers or drug drivers from an earlier time period, to identify factors specifically associated with drug driving, rather than common to all drivers. Two hundred and nineteen publications met the inclusion criteria and were included within the review. Based on the findings, a logic model was developed that presents the factors associated with drug driving. Various sociodemographic, psychosocial and legal factors emerged as the main factors associated with illegal drug driving. At the sociodemographic and psychological levels, drug drivers were more likely to be single, young males who often drive after using cannabis and who score high on sensation-seeking and impulsivity scales. The key social factor found to be associated with drug driving was peer acceptance/disapproval of the behaviour. At the legal level, the review suggested that the effectiveness of current enforcement approaches to drug driving vary among jurisdictions around the world due to differences in the level of perceived certainty of apprehension and the chances of punishment avoidance. Future research into the anticipated and actual rewards for drug driving is needed to inform the development of more effective countermeasures.

摘要

药物驾驶是一个全球性的严重问题,会增加道路交通事故的风险。本系统评价旨在确定与药物驾驶(即在摄入酒精以外的药物后驾驶)相关的因素,以突出现有知识的差距,并为设计更有效的对策提供信息。使用六个不同的数据库,从 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 7 月 31 日,对文献进行了检索。搜索方案遵循 PRISMA 指南,并在 PROSPERO 中进行了注册(#CRD42021234616)。符合纳入标准的研究将药物驾驶者与非药物驾驶者、仅酒精驾驶者或更早时期的药物驾驶者进行了比较,以确定与药物驾驶具体相关的因素,而不是与所有驾驶者共同的因素。有 219 篇出版物符合纳入标准,并包含在本综述中。根据研究结果,制定了一个逻辑模型,提出了与药物驾驶相关的因素。各种社会人口统计学、心理社会和法律因素被认为是与非法药物驾驶相关的主要因素。在社会人口统计学和心理层面上,药物驾驶者更有可能是单身、年轻的男性,他们经常在使用大麻后开车,并且在寻求刺激和冲动性量表上得分较高。与药物驾驶相关的关键社会因素是同伴对该行为的接受/不认可。在法律层面上,该综述表明,由于对逮捕的确定性感知程度和避免惩罚的机会在世界各国的司法管辖区之间存在差异,目前针对药物驾驶的执法方法的有效性也存在差异。需要对药物驾驶的预期和实际奖励进行未来研究,以制定更有效的对策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验