Salmi L-R, Noël L, Saillour-Glénisson F
Université de Bordeaux, ISPED, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Inserm, ISPED, Centre Inserm U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Consultant, F-74940 Annecy-Le-Vieux, France.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2023 Apr;71(2):101384. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2022.06.307. Epub 2022 Jul 10.
We have designed a methodological framework for experts involved in the support of decision-making in public health interventions.
The methodological framework consists of four elements: 1) A series of nine questions, formulated in non-technical terms, relevant to assessment of the usefulness of an intervention, at a given time in a given context; 2) Translation of these questions into concepts related to the evaluation of interventions (definition of the intervention, its target and objective, potential and actual effectiveness, safety, efficiency, and equity); 3) Logical organization of the information needed to address and answer the questions; and 4) An algorithm to translate the available information into recommendations on the real usefulness of the intervention in the context in which the questions were raised.
Each step is illustrated by questions raised about road safety interventions, screening, blood transfusion and measures proposed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Decision-making can be facilitated if experts provide decision-makers with a formal summary of the strengths and weaknesses of existing knowledge, based on an analysis of all facets of an intervention's potential usefulness.
我们为参与公共卫生干预决策支持的专家设计了一个方法框架。
该方法框架由四个要素组成:1)一系列九个用非技术术语表述的问题,与在给定时间和给定背景下评估一项干预措施的有用性相关;2)将这些问题转化为与干预评估相关的概念(干预措施的定义、其目标和目的、潜在和实际效果、安全性、效率和公平性);3)整理回答这些问题所需信息的逻辑架构;4)一种算法,用于将可用信息转化为关于在提出问题的背景下该干预措施实际有用性的建议。
通过对道路安全干预措施、筛查、输血以及新冠疫情期间提出的措施所引发问题的阐述,对每个步骤进行了说明。
如果专家基于对干预措施潜在有用性的各个方面的分析,为决策者提供现有知识优缺点的正式总结,那么决策过程可以得到促进。