Predictors and a Prediction Model for Central Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma (cN0).

OBJECTIVES

To screen out the predictors of central cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and establish a prediction model to guide the operation of PTC patients (cN0).

METHODS

Data from 296 PTC patients (cN0) who underwent thyroid operation at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were collected and retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups in accordance with central CLNM or not. Their information, including ultrasound (US) features, BRAF status, and other characteristics of the two groups, was analyzed and compared using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and the independent predictors were selected to construct a nomogram. The calibration plot, C-index, and decision curve analysis were used to assess the prediction model's calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

A total of 37.8% (112/296) of PTC patients had central CLNM, and 62.2% (184/296) did not. The two groups were compared using a univariate logistic regression analysis, and there were no significant differences between the two groups in sex, aspect ratio, boundary, morphology, hypoechoic nodule, thyroid peroxidase antibody, or tumor location (P>0.05), and there were significant differences between age, tumor size, capsule contact, microcalcifications, blood flow signal, thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb), and BRAF gene status (P<0.05). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to further clarify the correlation of these indices. However, only tumor size (OR=2.814, 95% Cl=1.6344.848, P<0.001), microcalcifications (OR=2.839, 95% Cl=1,6844.787, P<0.001) and TgAb (OR=1.964, 95% Cl=1.039~3,711, P=0.038) were independent predictors of central CLNM and were incorporated and used to construct the prediction nomogram. The model had good discrimination with a C-index of 0.715. An ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of this model. The decision curve analysis showed that the model was clinically useful when intervention was decided in the threshold range of 16% to 80%.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, three independent predictors of central CLNM, including tumor size (> 1.0 cm), US features (microcalcifications), and TgAb (positive), were screened out. A visualized nomogram model was established based on the three predictors in this study, which could be used as a basis of central cervical lymph node dissection (CLND) for PTC patients (cN0).