Krause Kirstyn L, Koerner Naomi, Antony Martin M
Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Behav Modif. 2022 Nov;46(6):1432-1459. doi: 10.1177/01454455221075754. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
Maximizing the discrepancy between expected and actual outcomes during exposure (i.e., expectancy violation) is thought to optimize inhibitory learning. The current study examined Craske et al.'s suggestion that engaging in cognitive restructuring (CR) before exposure prematurely reduces expectancy and mitigates outcomes. Participants ( = 93) with claustrophobia were randomly assigned to either 15 minutes of CR before exposure () or 15 minutes of CR after exposure (). Although the condition experienced greater expectancy reduction before exposure than the condition, both groups experienced similar overall expectancy reduction by the end of the intervention. Groups experienced similar gains, with large significant improvement at posttreatment and follow-up. Results suggest that both cognitive therapy and exposure therapy lead to expectancy reduction, but that the order of these interventions does not impact outcome. Clinicaltrials.org registration #NCT03628105.
在暴露过程中最大化预期结果与实际结果之间的差异(即预期违背)被认为能优化抑制性学习。当前的研究检验了克拉斯克等人的观点,即在暴露之前进行认知重构(CR)会过早降低预期并减轻结果。患有幽闭恐惧症的参与者(n = 93)被随机分配到暴露前进行15分钟的CR组(n = 47)或暴露后进行15分钟的CR组(n = 46)。尽管暴露前n = 47组比n = 46组经历了更大的预期降低,但到干预结束时两组的总体预期降低相似。两组都有相似的改善,在治疗后和随访时有显著的大幅改善。结果表明,认知疗法和暴露疗法都会导致预期降低,但这些干预措施的顺序并不影响结果。Clinicaltrials.org注册号#NCT03628105。