School of Business Administration, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou, 450046, People's Republic of China.
School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, 100048, People's Republic of China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(30):46145-46160. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19163-5. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
The trend of economic decline for coal cities is a serious threat to the high-quality development of China's economy, and how to improve the environmental total factor productivity (ETFP) has become an urgent issue. Based on the framework of data envelopment analysis (DEA), this paper estimates ETFP using the global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index (GMLPI). We decompose GMLPI into environmental technical efficiency change (ETEC) and the best practice gap change (BPGC). Then, the difference-in-difference (DID) model combining propensity score matching (PSM) method is used to investigate the effect of the Sustainable Development Plan of National Resource-based Cities (2013-2020) (SDP) aiming to improve ETFP. The results indicate that (1) On average, the GMLPI and BPGC are rising, while the ETEC is decreasing in the observed sample period; the western regions have the biggest BPGC, while the eastern regions have the biggest ETEC; (2) The SDP significantly improves the GMLPI and BPGC but has little effect on the ETEC; Coal cities located in eastern and central regions have policy effect, while the western regions do not have. (3) The SDP affects ETFP through slowing down the economic growth rate and reducing population agglomeration, but promoting the optimization of industrial structure. Those findings have policy implications for improving ETFP and promoting the industrial upgrade of coal cities.
煤炭城市经济衰退的趋势对中国经济的高质量发展构成了严重威胁,如何提高环境全要素生产率(ETFP)已成为当务之急。本文基于数据包络分析(DEA)框架,利用全局 Malmquist-Luenberger 生产率指数(GMLPI)来估算 ETFP。我们将 GMLPI 分解为环境技术效率变化(ETEC)和最佳实践差距变化(BPGC)。然后,采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)法的差分模型(DID)来考察旨在提高 ETFP 的《资源型城市可持续发展规划(2013-2020 年)》(SDP)的效果。结果表明:(1)在观测期内,GMLPI 和 BPGC 平均呈上升趋势,而 ETEC 呈下降趋势;西部地区的 BPGC 最大,而东部地区的 ETEC 最大;(2)SDP 显著提高了 GMLPI 和 BPGC,但对 ETEC 影响不大;位于东部和中部地区的煤炭城市有政策效果,而西部地区则没有。(3)SDP 通过减缓经济增长率和降低人口集聚来影响 ETFP,但促进了产业结构的优化。这些发现为提高 ETFP 和促进煤炭城市产业升级提供了政策启示。