IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2022 Apr;69(4):1485-1496. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2022.3151397. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
Deep learning is an effective method for ultrasonic crack characterization due to its high level of automation and accuracy. Simulating the training set has been shown to be an effective method of circumventing the lack of experimental data common to nondestructive evaluation (NDE) applications. However, a simulation can neither be completely accurate nor capture all variability present in the real inspection. This means that the experimental and simulated data will be from different (but related) distributions, leading to inaccuracy when a deep learning algorithm trained on simulated data is applied to experimental measurements. This article aims to tackle this problem through the use of domain adaptation (DA). A convolutional neural network (CNN) is used to predict the depth of surface-breaking defects, with in-line pipe inspection as the targeted application. Three DA methods across varying sizes of experimental training data are compared to two non-DA methods as a baseline. The performance of the methods tested is evaluated by sizing 15 experimental notches of length (1-5 mm) and inclined at angles of up to 20° from the vertical. Experimental training sets are formed with between 1 and 15 notches. Of the DA methods investigated, an adversarial approach is found to be the most effective way to use the limited experimental training data. With this method, and only three notches, the resulting network gives a root-mean-square error (RMSE) in sizing of 0.5 ± 0.037 mm, whereas with only experimental data the RMSE is 1.5 ± 0.13 mm and with only simulated data it is 0.64 ± 0.044 mm.
深度学习是一种有效的超声裂纹特征化方法,因为它具有高度的自动化和准确性。已经证明,模拟训练集是一种规避无损评估(NDE)应用中常见的实验数据缺乏的有效方法。然而,模拟既不可能完全准确,也不可能捕捉到真实检查中存在的所有变化性。这意味着实验和模拟数据将来自不同(但相关)的分布,当在模拟数据上训练的深度学习算法应用于实验测量时,会导致不准确。本文旨在通过使用领域自适应(DA)来解决这个问题。使用卷积神经网络(CNN)预测表面穿透缺陷的深度,以在线管道检测为目标应用。比较了三种不同大小实验训练数据的 DA 方法和两种非 DA 方法作为基线。通过对 15 个实验缺口的长度(1-5 毫米)进行尺寸测量,并以高达 20°的角度从垂直方向倾斜,评估所测试方法的性能。实验训练集由 1 到 15 个缺口组成。在所研究的 DA 方法中,发现对抗方法是利用有限的实验训练数据的最有效方法。使用这种方法,只需要三个缺口,得到的网络在尺寸测量中的均方根误差(RMSE)为 0.5±0.037 毫米,而仅使用实验数据的 RMSE 为 1.5±0.13 毫米,仅使用模拟数据的 RMSE 为 0.64±0.044 毫米。