• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种优化头颈癌患者质子治疗选择的决策支持工具。

A Decision Support Tool to Optimize Selection of Head and Neck Cancer Patients for Proton Therapy.

作者信息

Tambas Makbule, van der Laan Hans Paul, van der Schaaf Arjen, Steenbakkers Roel J H M, Langendijk Johannes Albertus

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 28;14(3):681. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030681.

DOI:10.3390/cancers14030681
PMID:35158949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8833534/
Abstract

Selection of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients for proton therapy (PT) using plan comparison (VMAT vs. IMPT) for each patient is labor-intensive. Our aim was to develop a decision support tool to identify patients with high probability to qualify for PT, at a very early stage (immediately after delineation) to avoid delay in treatment initiation. A total of 151 HNC patients were included, of which 106 (70%) patients qualified for PT. Linear regression models for individual OARs were created to predict the D to the OARs for VMAT and IMPT plans. The predictors were OAR volume percentages overlapping with target volumes. Then, actual and predicted plan comparison decisions were compared. Actual and predicted OAR D (VMAT R = 0.953, IMPT R = 0.975) and NTCP values (VMAT R = 0.986, IMPT R = 0.992) were highly correlated. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the decision support tool were 64%, 87%, 92% and 51%, respectively. The expected toxicity reduction with IMPT can be predicted using only the delineation data. The probability of qualifying for PT is >90% when the tool indicates a positive outcome for PT. This tool will contribute significantly to a more effective selection of HNC patients for PT at a much earlier stage, reducing treatment delay.

摘要

为每位头颈癌(HNC)患者使用计划比较(容积调强放疗[VMAT]与调强质子放疗[IMPT])来选择质子治疗(PT)患者的工作强度很大。我们的目标是开发一种决策支持工具,以便在非常早期阶段(勾画完成后立即)识别有高概率符合质子治疗条件的患者,从而避免治疗开始的延迟。总共纳入了151名头颈癌患者,其中106名(70%)患者符合质子治疗条件。针对各个危及器官(OAR)创建了线性回归模型,以预测VMAT和IMPT计划中危及器官的剂量(D)。预测因素是与靶体积重叠的危及器官体积百分比。然后,比较实际和预测的计划比较决策。实际和预测的危及器官剂量(VMAT的R = 0.953,IMPT的R = 0.975)以及正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)值(VMAT的R = 0.986,IMPT的R = 0.992)高度相关。决策支持工具的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为64%、(87%)、92%和51%。仅使用勾画数据就可以预测IMPT预期的毒性降低情况。当该工具表明质子治疗有阳性结果时,符合质子治疗条件的概率>90%。该工具将显著有助于在更早阶段更有效地选择适合质子治疗的头颈癌患者,减少治疗延迟。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b436/8833534/e91fcf93e60d/cancers-14-00681-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b436/8833534/8011693c559f/cancers-14-00681-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b436/8833534/1de821a45d42/cancers-14-00681-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b436/8833534/ac995516d90c/cancers-14-00681-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b436/8833534/51fef3adf18d/cancers-14-00681-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b436/8833534/1edabe5eb544/cancers-14-00681-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b436/8833534/e91fcf93e60d/cancers-14-00681-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b436/8833534/8011693c559f/cancers-14-00681-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b436/8833534/1de821a45d42/cancers-14-00681-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b436/8833534/ac995516d90c/cancers-14-00681-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b436/8833534/51fef3adf18d/cancers-14-00681-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b436/8833534/1edabe5eb544/cancers-14-00681-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b436/8833534/e91fcf93e60d/cancers-14-00681-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
A Decision Support Tool to Optimize Selection of Head and Neck Cancer Patients for Proton Therapy.一种优化头颈癌患者质子治疗选择的决策支持工具。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 28;14(3):681. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030681.
2
Development of advanced preselection tools to reduce redundant plan comparisons in model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for proton therapy.开发先进的预选工具,以减少在基于模型的头颈癌患者质子治疗选择中多余的计划比较。
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Jul;160:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
3
First experience with model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for proton therapy.质子治疗头颈部癌症患者模型选择的初步经验。
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Oct;151:206-213. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.056. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
4
ART for head and neck patients: On the difference between VMAT and IMPT.头颈部患者的调强放疗:容积调强弧形放疗与容积旋转调强放疗的差异
Acta Oncol. 2015;54(8):1166-74. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1028590. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
5
Impact of setup and range uncertainties on TCP and NTCP following VMAT or IMPT of oropharyngeal cancer patients.头颈部肿瘤 VMAT 或 IMPT 治疗中摆位和靶区范围不确定性对 TCP 和 NTCP 的影响。
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Apr 23;64(9):095001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab1459.
6
NTCP reduction for advanced head and neck cancer patients using proton therapy for complete or sequential boost treatment versus photon therapy.对于晚期头颈癌患者,使用质子治疗进行完整或序贯增敏治疗与光子治疗相比时的正常组织并发症概率降低情况。
Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1658-64. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1071920. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
7
Functional avoidance-based intensity modulated proton therapy with 4DCT derived ventilation imaging for lung cancer.基于功能回避的调强质子治疗,联合 4DCT 衍生的通气成像,用于肺癌。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Jul;22(7):276-285. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13323. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
8
Robust Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Increases Estimated Clinical Benefit in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.稳健的调强质子治疗(IMPT)增加了头颈癌患者的估计临床获益。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152477. eCollection 2016.
9
Potential proton and photon dose degradation in advanced head and neck cancer patients by intratherapy changes.晚期头颈癌患者在治疗过程中发生变化导致的潜在质子和光子剂量降低。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Nov;18(6):104-113. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12189. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
10
Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.前列腺病例的调强质子治疗(IMPT)、容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)和4π放疗的治疗计划比较
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0761-0.

引用本文的文献

1
A Decision-Making Method for Photon/Proton Selection for Nasopharyngeal Cancer Based on Dose Prediction and NTCP.一种基于剂量预测和正常组织并发症概率模型的鼻咽癌光子/质子治疗选择决策方法
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 11;17(16):2620. doi: 10.3390/cancers17162620.
2
Envisioning an Italian Head and Neck Proton Therapy Model-Based Selection: Challenge and Opportunity.设想基于意大利头颈质子治疗模式的选择:挑战与机遇。
Int J Part Ther. 2025 Mar 20;16:100745. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.100745. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Particle beam therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of MR-linac and proton therapy in two radiotherapy departments in The Netherlands: Recommendations based on lessons learned.荷兰两家放射治疗部门中 MR-linac 和质子治疗的实施:基于经验教训的建议。
Radiother Oncol. 2022 Feb;167:14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.007. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
2
Current practice in proton therapy delivery in adult cancer patients across Europe.欧洲成人癌症患者质子治疗实施现状。
Radiother Oncol. 2022 Feb;167:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
3
National Protocol for Model-Based Selection for Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer.
鼻咽癌的粒子束治疗:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022 Aug 23;37:41-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.08.011. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Outcomes and Toxicities of Nonmedullary Thyroid Tumors Treated with Proton Beam Radiation Therapy.质子束放射治疗非髓样甲状腺肿瘤的疗效和毒性
Int J Part Ther. 2022 Jul 15;9(2):20-30. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-22-00005.1. eCollection 2022 Fall.
5
Proton Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Early Clinical Experience and Current Challenges.头颈部鳞状细胞癌的质子治疗:早期临床经验与当前挑战
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 24;14(11):2587. doi: 10.3390/cancers14112587.
头颈部癌质子治疗基于模型选择的国家协议。
Int J Part Ther. 2021 Jun 25;8(1):354-365. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00089.1. eCollection 2021 Summer.
4
Development of advanced preselection tools to reduce redundant plan comparisons in model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for proton therapy.开发先进的预选工具,以减少在基于模型的头颈癌患者质子治疗选择中多余的计划比较。
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Jul;160:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Model based patient pre-selection for intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) using automated treatment planning and machine learning.基于模型的质子调强治疗(IMPT)患者预选择,采用自动化治疗计划和机器学习。
Radiother Oncol. 2021 May;158:224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.02.034. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
6
Examining the Effect of Travel Distance to Pediatric Cancer Centers and Rurality on Survival and Treatment Experiences: A Systematic Review.考察旅行距离和农村地区对儿科癌症中心生存和治疗体验的影响:系统评价。
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2021 Jul 1;43(5):159-171. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002095.
7
Referral Patterns and Treatment Delays in Medulloblastoma: A Large Academic Proton Center Experience.髓母细胞瘤的转诊模式与治疗延迟:大型学术性质子中心的经验
Int J Part Ther. 2020 Dec 31;7(3):1-10. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00038.1. eCollection 2021 Winter.
8
First experience with model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for proton therapy.质子治疗头颈部癌症患者模型选择的初步经验。
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Oct;151:206-213. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.056. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
Past, present and future of proton therapy for head and neck cancer.头颈部肿瘤质子治疗的过去、现在和未来。
Oral Oncol. 2020 Nov;110:104879. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104879. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
10
Impact of Travel Distance on Radiation Treatment Modality for Central Nervous System Disease.旅行距离对中枢神经系统疾病放射治疗方式的影响。
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019 Oct;10(4):606-607. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3399431. Epub 2019 Dec 11.