文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

新冠疫苗的现状与未来展望:一项科学计量学综述

Current and Future Perspectives on the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Scientometric Review.

作者信息

Noruzi Alireza, Gholampour Behzad, Gholampour Sajad, Jafari Somayeh, Farshid Razieh, Stanek Agata, Saboury Ali Akbar

机构信息

Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417935840, Iran.

Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran 3197937551, Iran.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 29;11(3):750. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030750.


DOI:10.3390/jcm11030750
PMID:35160202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8836413/
Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study attempted to draw the present and future perspective of the COVID-19 vaccine by identifying the most important scientists and their scientific contexts, trends of research topics, and relationships between different entities. METHODS: To achieve this purpose, bibliometric and scientometric techniques were used to analyze 6288 scientific documents contributing to COVID-19 vaccines from the beginning of 2019 to 13 December 2021, indexed in the Web of Science. RESULTS: The United States (US) had the greatest impact by publishing 2104 documents and receiving 32,958 citations. The US and the UK countries had the highest level of scientific collaborations with 192 collaborative studies. The University of Oxford and the Harvard Medical School were the most active institutions, and the University of Oxford and Emory University were the most influential institutions. Pollard AJ and Lambe T had the most publications and the highest citations and h-index. T Lambe, SC Gilbert, M Voysey, and AJ Pollard from the University of Oxford had the highest number of co-authorships. More than 19% of the research was conducted in the field of immunology. journal had the most publications, with 425 articles. The US Department of Health & Human Services granted the most research. In 2019, studies were focused on the topics of COVID-19 virus identification and ways to deal with it; in 2020, studies focused on the topics of COVID-19 and vaccines, whereas in 2021, they focused on the topics of COVID-19 vaccines and their effects, vaccines hesitancy, the role of healthcare workers in COVID-19, as well as discussions about these vaccines in the social media. CONCLUSIONS: Recognition of the most important actors (countries, institutes, researchers, and channels for the release of COVID-19 vaccine studies), research trends, and fields of study on the COVID-19 vaccine can be useful for researchers, countries, and policy makers in the field of science and health to make decisions and better understand these vaccines.

摘要

未标注:本研究试图通过确定最重要的科学家及其科学背景、研究主题趋势以及不同实体之间的关系,勾勒出新冠疫苗的现状和未来前景。 方法:为实现这一目的,采用文献计量学和科学计量学技术,对2019年初至2021年12月13日在科学网索引的6288篇关于新冠疫苗的科学文献进行分析。 结果:美国发表了2104篇文献,被引用32958次,影响最大。美国和英国的科学合作水平最高,有192项合作研究。牛津大学和哈佛医学院是最活跃的机构,牛津大学和埃默里大学是最具影响力的机构。波拉德·A·J和兰贝·T的出版物最多、被引用次数最高且h指数最高。牛津大学的兰贝·T、吉尔伯特·S·C、沃西·M和波拉德·A·J的共同作者数量最多。超过19%的研究在免疫学领域进行。《柳叶刀》杂志的出版物最多,有425篇文章。美国卫生与公众服务部资助的研究最多。2019年,研究集中在新冠病毒识别及应对方法的主题上;2020年,研究集中在新冠与疫苗的主题上,而2021年,研究集中在新冠疫苗及其效果、疫苗犹豫、医护人员在新冠疫情中的作用以及社交媒体上对这些疫苗的讨论等主题上。 结论:识别新冠疫苗研究中最重要的参与者(国家、机构、研究人员以及新冠疫苗研究成果发布渠道)、研究趋势和研究领域,有助于科学与健康领域的研究人员、国家和政策制定者做出决策并更好地理解这些疫苗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/520322ddbf19/jcm-11-00750-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/f1bef9f3120e/jcm-11-00750-g0A1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/8669db455552/jcm-11-00750-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/9eedea4dcc15/jcm-11-00750-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/563388e78a67/jcm-11-00750-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/bb10e02bdcc5/jcm-11-00750-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/4a6b1aab26ad/jcm-11-00750-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/f1cdc7cda64d/jcm-11-00750-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/cb8a153606e7/jcm-11-00750-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/1355078d3230/jcm-11-00750-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/80e79f1edb5c/jcm-11-00750-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/6c0fb7a9b750/jcm-11-00750-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/b2fbcc9621b6/jcm-11-00750-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/3deb5ae476bb/jcm-11-00750-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/520322ddbf19/jcm-11-00750-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/f1bef9f3120e/jcm-11-00750-g0A1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/8669db455552/jcm-11-00750-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/9eedea4dcc15/jcm-11-00750-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/563388e78a67/jcm-11-00750-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/bb10e02bdcc5/jcm-11-00750-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/4a6b1aab26ad/jcm-11-00750-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/f1cdc7cda64d/jcm-11-00750-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/cb8a153606e7/jcm-11-00750-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/1355078d3230/jcm-11-00750-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/80e79f1edb5c/jcm-11-00750-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/6c0fb7a9b750/jcm-11-00750-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/b2fbcc9621b6/jcm-11-00750-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/3deb5ae476bb/jcm-11-00750-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99bb/8836413/520322ddbf19/jcm-11-00750-g013.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Current and Future Perspectives on the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Scientometric Review.

J Clin Med. 2022-1-29

[2]
Current status of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine research based on bibliometric analysis.

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022-11-30

[3]
Bibliometric analysis of global scientific literature on vaccine hesitancy in peer-reviewed journals (1990-2019).

BMC Public Health. 2020-8-17

[4]
Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on Coronavirus (COVID-19).

Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020-5-23

[5]
Update on the COVID-19 Vaccine Research Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Infect Drug Resist. 2021-10-14

[6]
A Bibliometric Visualization Analysis on Vaccine Development of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Vaccines (Basel). 2023-1-29

[7]
The state of social science research on COVID-19.

Scientometrics. 2022

[8]
Bibliometric Analysis of Global Scientific Production on COVID-19 and Vaccines.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023-3-8

[9]
Tracking trends in COVID-19 vaccines based on 47 different vaccines: A bibliometric review.

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023-8-1

[10]
Investigation of highly cited publications related to vaccines against COVID-19: current state and future predictions.

Bratisl Lek Listy. 2022

引用本文的文献

[1]
Research hotspots and global trends in respiratory syncytial virus over past five years.

Front Microbiol. 2025-8-4

[2]
Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition: a bibliometric analysis of research trends and contributions (2018-2024).

Front Nutr. 2025-7-8

[3]
Knowledge Mapping of COVID-19 and Asthma/Allergic Rhinitis: A Visual and Bibliometric Analysis.

J Asthma Allergy. 2025-5-6

[4]
Global trends of laser bone ablation: bibliometric analysis of publications from 1979 to 2023.

Front Surg. 2025-3-11

[5]
Global research trends and hotspots in rheumatoid arthritis joint replacement:Bibliometric analysis and visualization study.

J Orthop. 2024-9-29

[6]
Trends and challenges on inflammatory microenvironment in diabetic wound from 2014 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis.

Int Wound J. 2024-8

[7]
Global hotspots and trends in diabetic peripheral neuropathy research from 2011 to 2023.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024-8-9

[8]
Top 100 cited research on COVID-19 vaccines: A bibliometric analysis and evidence mapping.

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024-12-31

[9]
Research progress and challenges in stem cell therapy for diabetic foot: Bibliometric analysis and perspectives.

World J Stem Cells. 2024-1-26

[10]
Global research status of localised scleroderma reported over the period 1993-2022: A 30-year bibliometric analysis.

Int Wound J. 2024-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Infection of Human Cells by SARS-CoV-2 and Molecular Overview of Gastrointestinal, Neurological, and Hepatic Problems in COVID-19 Patients.

J Clin Med. 2021-10-20

[2]
Interdisciplinary Approaches to COVID-19.

Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021

[3]
COVID-19 vaccine research focusses on safety, efficacy, immunoinformatics, and vaccine production and delivery: a bibliometric analysis based on VOSviewer.

Biosci Trends. 2021-5-11

[4]
COVID-19 vaccine development and a potential nanomaterial path forward.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2020-7-15

[5]
The urgent need for integrated science to fight COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

J Transl Med. 2020-5-19

[6]
Rapid COVID-19 vaccine development.

Science. 2020-5-29

[7]
A review on the cleavage priming of the spike protein on coronavirus by angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 and furin.

J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2021-5

[8]
Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study.

Lancet Respir Med. 2020-2-24

[9]
Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro.

Cell Res. 2020-3

[10]
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.

Lancet. 2020-1-30

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索