Noruzi Alireza, Gholampour Behzad, Gholampour Sajad, Jafari Somayeh, Farshid Razieh, Stanek Agata, Saboury Ali Akbar
Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417935840, Iran.
Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran 3197937551, Iran.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 29;11(3):750. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030750.
UNLABELLED: This study attempted to draw the present and future perspective of the COVID-19 vaccine by identifying the most important scientists and their scientific contexts, trends of research topics, and relationships between different entities. METHODS: To achieve this purpose, bibliometric and scientometric techniques were used to analyze 6288 scientific documents contributing to COVID-19 vaccines from the beginning of 2019 to 13 December 2021, indexed in the Web of Science. RESULTS: The United States (US) had the greatest impact by publishing 2104 documents and receiving 32,958 citations. The US and the UK countries had the highest level of scientific collaborations with 192 collaborative studies. The University of Oxford and the Harvard Medical School were the most active institutions, and the University of Oxford and Emory University were the most influential institutions. Pollard AJ and Lambe T had the most publications and the highest citations and h-index. T Lambe, SC Gilbert, M Voysey, and AJ Pollard from the University of Oxford had the highest number of co-authorships. More than 19% of the research was conducted in the field of immunology. journal had the most publications, with 425 articles. The US Department of Health & Human Services granted the most research. In 2019, studies were focused on the topics of COVID-19 virus identification and ways to deal with it; in 2020, studies focused on the topics of COVID-19 and vaccines, whereas in 2021, they focused on the topics of COVID-19 vaccines and their effects, vaccines hesitancy, the role of healthcare workers in COVID-19, as well as discussions about these vaccines in the social media. CONCLUSIONS: Recognition of the most important actors (countries, institutes, researchers, and channels for the release of COVID-19 vaccine studies), research trends, and fields of study on the COVID-19 vaccine can be useful for researchers, countries, and policy makers in the field of science and health to make decisions and better understand these vaccines.
未标注:本研究试图通过确定最重要的科学家及其科学背景、研究主题趋势以及不同实体之间的关系,勾勒出新冠疫苗的现状和未来前景。 方法:为实现这一目的,采用文献计量学和科学计量学技术,对2019年初至2021年12月13日在科学网索引的6288篇关于新冠疫苗的科学文献进行分析。 结果:美国发表了2104篇文献,被引用32958次,影响最大。美国和英国的科学合作水平最高,有192项合作研究。牛津大学和哈佛医学院是最活跃的机构,牛津大学和埃默里大学是最具影响力的机构。波拉德·A·J和兰贝·T的出版物最多、被引用次数最高且h指数最高。牛津大学的兰贝·T、吉尔伯特·S·C、沃西·M和波拉德·A·J的共同作者数量最多。超过19%的研究在免疫学领域进行。《柳叶刀》杂志的出版物最多,有425篇文章。美国卫生与公众服务部资助的研究最多。2019年,研究集中在新冠病毒识别及应对方法的主题上;2020年,研究集中在新冠与疫苗的主题上,而2021年,研究集中在新冠疫苗及其效果、疫苗犹豫、医护人员在新冠疫情中的作用以及社交媒体上对这些疫苗的讨论等主题上。 结论:识别新冠疫苗研究中最重要的参与者(国家、机构、研究人员以及新冠疫苗研究成果发布渠道)、研究趋势和研究领域,有助于科学与健康领域的研究人员、国家和政策制定者做出决策并更好地理解这些疫苗。
J Clin Med. 2022-1-29
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022-11-30
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020-5-23
Infect Drug Resist. 2021-10-14
Vaccines (Basel). 2023-1-29
Scientometrics. 2022
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023-3-8
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023-8-1
Front Microbiol. 2025-8-4
J Asthma Allergy. 2025-5-6
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024-8-9
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024-12-31
World J Stem Cells. 2024-1-26
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021
Nat Nanotechnol. 2020-7-15
J Transl Med. 2020-5-19
Science. 2020-5-29