Steigmann Larissa, Di Gianfilippo Riccardo, Steigmann Marius, Wang Hom-Lay
Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Steigmann Institute, 69151 Neckargemünd, Germany.
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 19;15(3):733. doi: 10.3390/ma15030733.
Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) can successfully reduce volumetric ridge changes. However, there is still no consensus on what technique is the most advantageous for each specific clinical scenario. Hence, the aim of the present paper was to provide a treatment decision tree to guide the choice of predictable ARP procedures based on extraction socket buccal bone morphology and integrity.
Three socket types (ST) are proposed and discussed based on buccal bone morphology (intact, dehiscence or fenestration).
A decision tree for ARP was developed in order to merge ST classification with suitable treatment modalities. In the decision tree, the issue of when to allow unassisted healing or ARP was discussed. Described methods included bone grafting and collagen plug, and absorbable membrane or non-resorbable membrane, with or without flap elevation.
A decision tree for ARP procedures was provided to guide clinicians towards the most conservative and predictable treatment approach based on remaining socket anatomical structures after extraction.
牙槽嵴保存术(ARP)能够成功减少牙槽嵴体积变化。然而,对于每种特定临床情况哪种技术最具优势,目前仍未达成共识。因此,本文的目的是提供一个治疗决策树,以指导基于拔牙窝颊侧骨形态和完整性来选择可预测的ARP手术。
基于颊侧骨形态(完整、裂开或开窗)提出并讨论了三种拔牙窝类型(ST)。
开发了一个ARP决策树,以便将ST分类与合适的治疗方式相结合。在决策树中,讨论了何时允许自然愈合或进行ARP的问题。所描述的方法包括骨移植和胶原塞,以及可吸收膜或不可吸收膜,有无翻瓣。
提供了一个ARP手术决策树,以指导临床医生根据拔牙后剩余拔牙窝的解剖结构采用最保守且可预测的治疗方法。