Department of Return to Play, Sevilla FC, 41005 Seville, Spain.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad San Jorge, Campus Universitario, Autov A23 km 299, 50830 Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;19(3):1029. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031029.
This study analyzed the effects of two different training programs on functional performance and inter-limb asymmetries in basketball players. Twenty-four elite youth basketball players were randomly assigned to a training program including variable unilateral horizontal movements (VUH, n = 12) or unilateral lateral movements (VUL, n = 12). Eccentric-overload training (EOT) was performed twice a week for a six-week period. Functional performance assessment included a countermovement jump test, unilateral multidirectional jumping tests (i.e., lateral, horizontal, and vertical), a rebound jump test, a limb symmetry index, a 25 m linear sprint test, and several change of direction (COD) tests. Within-group analysis showed substantial improvements in almost all functional tests in both groups (ES = 0.35-0.89). Furthermore, almost all jumping asymmetries were improved in both groups (ES = 0.38-0.69) except for vertical jumping asymmetry in VUL (ES = -0.04). Between-group analyses showed a substantial and possibly better performance in vertical jumping asymmetry and 5 m in VUH compared to that of VUL, respectively. In contrast, lateral jumping with left (ES = 1.22) and right leg (ES = 0.49) were substantially greater in VUL than in VUH. Specific force-vector training programs induced substantial improvements in both functional performance tests and inter-limb asymmetries, although greater improvements of lateral and horizontal variables may depend on the specific force vector targeted.
本研究分析了两种不同训练方案对篮球运动员功能表现和肢体不对称性的影响。24 名精英青年篮球运动员被随机分配到包括可变单侧水平运动(VUH,n = 12)或单侧侧向运动(VUL,n = 12)的训练方案中。离心超负荷训练(EOT)每周进行两次,持续六周。功能表现评估包括纵跳测试、单侧多方向跳跃测试(即侧向、水平和垂直)、反弹跳测试、肢体对称性指数、25 米直线冲刺测试和几个变向(COD)测试。组内分析显示,两组几乎所有功能测试都有显著提高(ES = 0.35-0.89)。此外,两组几乎所有跳跃不对称性都得到改善(ES = 0.38-0.69),除了 VUL 中的垂直跳跃不对称性(ES = -0.04)。组间分析显示,与 VUL 相比,VUH 中的垂直跳跃不对称性和 5 米测试有更大的提高。相比之下,VUL 中左腿(ES = 1.22)和右腿(ES = 0.49)的侧向跳跃有更大的提高。特定力向量训练方案引起了功能表现测试和肢体不对称性的显著提高,尽管横向和水平变量的更大提高可能取决于目标特定力向量。