Perdok Hilde, Jans Suze, Verhoeven Corine, Henneman Lidewij, Wiegers Therese, Mol Ben Willem, Schellevis François, de Jonge Ank
Department of Midwifery Science, Midwifery Academy Amsterdam/Groningen (AVAG) and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 26;16(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0975-z.
This study aims to give insight into the opinions of maternity care professionals and other stakeholders on the integration of midwife-led care and obstetrician-led care and on the facilitating and inhibiting factors for integrating maternity care.
Qualitative study using interviews and focus groups from November 2012 to February 2013 in the Netherlands. Seventeen purposively selected stakeholder representatives participated in individual semi-structured interviews and 21 in focus groups. One face-to-face focus group included a combined group of midwives, obstetricians and a paediatrician involved in maternity care. Two online focus groups included a group of primary care midwives and a group of clinical midwives respectively. Thematic analysis was performed using Atlas.ti. Two researchers independently coded the interview and focus group transcripts by means of a mind map and themes and relations between them were described.
Three main themes were identified with regard to integrating maternity care: client-centred care, continuity of care and task shifting between professionals. Opinions differed regarding the optimal maternity care organisation model. Participants considered the current payment structure an inhibiting factor, whereas a new modified payment structure based on the actual amount of work performed was seen as a facilitating factor. Both midwives and obstetricians indicated that they were afraid to loose autonomy.
An integrated maternity care system may improve client-centred care, provide continuity of care for women during labour and birth and include a shift of responsibilities between health care providers. However, differences of opinion among professionals and other stakeholders with regard to the optimal maternity care organisation model may complicate the implementation of integrated care. Important factors for a successful implementation of integrated maternity care are an appropriate payment structure and maintenance of the autonomy of professionals.
本研究旨在深入了解产科护理专业人员和其他利益相关者对助产士主导护理与产科医生主导护理整合的看法,以及对产科护理整合的促进因素和阻碍因素。
2012年11月至2013年2月在荷兰进行的定性研究,采用访谈和焦点小组的方式。有目的地选取了17名利益相关者代表参与个人半结构化访谈,21人参与焦点小组。一个面对面焦点小组包括参与产科护理的助产士、产科医生和一名儿科医生的组合。两个在线焦点小组分别包括一组初级护理助产士和一组临床助产士。使用Atlas.ti进行主题分析。两名研究人员通过思维导图对访谈和焦点小组记录进行独立编码,并描述其中的主题及它们之间的关系。
在产科护理整合方面确定了三个主要主题:以客户为中心的护理、护理的连续性以及专业人员之间的任务转移。对于最佳产科护理组织模式,各方意见存在分歧。参与者认为当前的支付结构是一个阻碍因素,而基于实际工作量的新的改良支付结构被视为一个促进因素。助产士和产科医生均表示他们担心失去自主权。
综合产科护理系统可能会改善以客户为中心的护理,在分娩期间为女性提供护理连续性,并包括医疗服务提供者之间的责任转移。然而,专业人员和其他利益相关者在最佳产科护理组织模式上的意见分歧可能会使综合护理的实施复杂化。成功实施综合产科护理的重要因素是适当的支付结构和维持专业人员的自主权。