School of Management, China Institute for Studies in Energy Policy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Energy Economics and Energy Policy, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 31;19(3):1649. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031649.
China has tried to replace solid fuels with cleaner energy in households. The benefits of fuel switching need to be identified. This article shows that households using solid cooking fuels suffer heavier medical expenses than those using non-solid cooking fuels. After accounting for family characteristics, using solid fuels is associated with 1.4-1.9% increases in medical care. Through the analysis of the impact mechanism, we found that solid cooking fuels harm the health conditions of family members and increase the probability of illness, thereby increasing medical expenses, while the ratio of fuel fees does not change significantly if switching cooking fuels. Furthermore, we explored heterogeneity to better understand the underlying relationship. For urban and higher-educated families with house ownership, the impact of solid fuels on medical expenses was weaker compared to rural and lower-educated households without owned houses. Therefore, considering the costs and benefits, we recommend continuing the conversion from solid fuels to non-solid fuels. In the fuel transition process, it is beneficial to raise residents' awareness and improve behavior to avoid indoor air pollution.
中国已试图在家庭中用清洁能源替代固体燃料。需要明确燃料转换的好处。本文表明,使用固体烹饪燃料的家庭比使用非固体烹饪燃料的家庭支付更高的医疗费用。在考虑家庭特征后,使用固体燃料与医疗支出增加 1.4%-1.9%有关。通过对影响机制的分析,我们发现固体烹饪燃料会损害家庭成员的健康状况并增加患病概率,从而增加医疗费用,而转换烹饪燃料并不会显著改变燃料费用的比例。此外,我们还进行了异质性分析,以更好地理解潜在关系。对于有住房所有权的城市和受教育程度较高的家庭来说,与农村和受教育程度较低的无房家庭相比,固体燃料对医疗费用的影响较弱。因此,从成本效益角度考虑,我们建议继续推进从固体燃料向非固体燃料的转换。在燃料转型过程中,提高居民的意识并改善行为以避免室内空气污染是有益的。