• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尼日利亚拉各斯的烹饪燃料:与家庭选择煤油或液化石油气(LPG)相关的因素。

Cooking Fuels in Lagos, Nigeria: Factors Associated with Household Choice of Kerosene or Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG).

机构信息

College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos 100254, Nigeria.

Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idi-Araba, Lagos 100254, Nigeria.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 31;15(4):641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040641.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15040641
PMID:29614713
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5923683/
Abstract

Cooking with dirty-burning fuels is associated with health risk from household air pollution. We assessed the prevalence of and factors associated with the use of cooking fuels, and attitudes and barriers towards use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). This was a cross-sectional, population-based survey conducted in 519 households in Lagos, Nigeria. We used a structured questionnaire to obtain information regarding choice of household cooking fuel and the attitudes towards the use of LPG. Kerosene was the most frequently used cooking fuel ( = 475, 91.5%; primary use = 364, 70.1%) followed by charcoal ( = 159, 30.6%; primary use = 88, 17%) and LPG ( = 86, 16.6%; primary use = 63, 12.1%). Higher level of education, higher income and younger age were associated with LPG vs. kerosene use. Fuel expenditure on LPG was significantly lower than for kerosene ( N (Naira) 2169.0 ± 1507.0 vs. N 2581.6 ± 1407.5). Over 90% of non-LPG users were willing to switch to LPG but cited safety issues and high cost as potential barriers to switching. Our findings suggest that misinformation and beliefs regarding benefits, safety and cost of LPG are important barriers to LPG use. An educational intervention program could be a cost-effective approach to improve LPG adoption and should be formally addressed through a well-designed community-based intervention study.

摘要

燃烧不清洁燃料与家庭空气污染导致的健康风险有关。我们评估了使用烹饪燃料的流行情况和相关因素,以及对液化石油气(LPG)的使用态度和障碍。这是在尼日利亚拉各斯的 519 户家庭中进行的一项横断面、基于人群的调查。我们使用结构化问卷获取有关家庭烹饪燃料选择以及对 LPG 使用态度的信息。煤油是最常用的烹饪燃料(= 475,91.5%;主要用途= 364,70.1%),其次是木炭(= 159,30.6%;主要用途= 88,17%)和 LPG(= 86,16.6%;主要用途= 63,12.1%)。较高的教育水平、较高的收入和较年轻的年龄与 LPG 与煤油的使用相关。LPG 的燃料支出明显低于煤油(N(奈拉)2169.0 ± 1507.0 与 N 2581.6 ± 1407.5)。超过 90%的非 LPG 用户愿意改用 LPG,但表示安全问题和高成本是改用的潜在障碍。我们的研究结果表明,对 LPG 的益处、安全性和成本的误解和信念是阻碍 LPG 使用的重要因素。教育干预计划可能是改善 LPG 采用的一种具有成本效益的方法,应通过精心设计的基于社区的干预研究正式解决。

相似文献

1
Cooking Fuels in Lagos, Nigeria: Factors Associated with Household Choice of Kerosene or Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG).尼日利亚拉各斯的烹饪燃料:与家庭选择煤油或液化石油气(LPG)相关的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 31;15(4):641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040641.
2
Increased risk of respiratory illness associated with kerosene fuel use among women and children in urban Bangalore, India.印度班加罗尔市区妇女和儿童因使用煤油燃料而患呼吸道疾病的风险增加。
Occup Environ Med. 2015 Feb;72(2):114-22. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102472. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
3
Household Determinants of Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) as a Cooking Fuel in South West Cameroon.喀麦隆西南部家庭将液化石油气用作烹饪燃料的决定因素
Ecohealth. 2018 Dec;15(4):729-743. doi: 10.1007/s10393-018-1367-9. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
4
Adoption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stoves in Guatemala: A Mixed-Methods Study.危地马拉液化石油气炉灶的采用:一项混合方法研究。
Ecohealth. 2018 Dec;15(4):745-756. doi: 10.1007/s10393-018-1368-8. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Perceptions of Improved Biomass and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stoves in Puno, Peru: Implications for Promoting Sustained and Exclusive Adoption of Clean Cooking Technologies.秘鲁普诺对改良生物质炉灶和液化石油气炉灶的认知:对促进持续和广泛采用清洁烹饪技术的启示
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Feb 13;14(2):182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020182.
6
Designing a comprehensive behaviour change intervention to promote and monitor exclusive use of liquefied petroleum gas stoves for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial.为家庭空气污染干预网络(HAPIN)试验设计一项全面的行为改变干预措施,以促进和监测液化石油气炉灶的独家使用情况。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 29;10(9):e037761. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037761.
7
Effect of household air pollution due to solid fuel combustion on childhood respiratory diseases in a semi urban population in Sri Lanka.固体燃料燃烧导致的家庭空气污染对斯里兰卡半城市人口儿童呼吸道疾病的影响。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1674-5.
8
Exploring the impact of a liquefied petroleum gas intervention on time use in rural Peru: A mixed methods study on perceptions, use, and implications of time savings.探讨液化石油气干预对秘鲁农村时间利用的影响:一项关于节省时间的看法、使用和影响的混合方法研究。
Environ Int. 2020 Dec;145:105932. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105932. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
9
Distribution of sources of household air pollution: a cross-sectional study in Cameroon.家庭空气污染来源分布:喀麦隆的一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 8;21(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10350-6.
10
Effects of a liquefied petroleum gas stove intervention on pollutant exposure and adult cardiopulmonary outcomes (CHAP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.液化石油气炉灶干预对污染物暴露及成人心肺结局的影响(CHAP):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Nov 3;18(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2179-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Trade-Offs of Boiling Drinking Water with Solid Fuels: A Modeling Study.使用固体燃料煮沸饮用水的健康权衡:一项建模研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 2025 Jun;133(6):67021. doi: 10.1289/EHP15059. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
2
Exploring cooking fuel choices among Ghanaian women of reproductive age: A socio-economic analysis from a statistical mechanics perspective.探索加纳育龄妇女的烹饪燃料选择:基于统计力学视角的社会经济分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 14;20(1):e0317004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317004. eCollection 2025.
3
Acceptability of improved cook stoves-a scoping review of the literature.改良炉灶的可接受性——文献综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;5(1):e0004042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004042. eCollection 2025.
4
Does Use of Solid Cooking Fuels Increase Family Medical Expenses in China?固体燃料的使用是否会增加中国家庭的医疗支出?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 31;19(3):1649. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031649.
5
Fidelity and Adherence to a Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stove and Fuel Intervention during Gestation: The Multi-Country Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) Randomized Controlled Trial.妊娠期液化石油气炉和燃料干预的一致性和依从性:多国家户用空气污染干预网络(HAPIN)随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 29;18(23):12592. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312592.
6
Drivers of anthropogenic air emissions in Nigeria - A review.尼日利亚人为空气排放的驱动因素——综述
Heliyon. 2021 Mar 8;7(3):e06398. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06398. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
Drivers of the Adoption and Exclusive Use of Clean Fuel for Cooking in Sub-Saharan Africa: Learnings and Policy Considerations from Cameroon.撒哈拉以南非洲地区烹饪燃料采用和专用清洁燃料的驱动因素:来自喀麦隆的经验教训和政策考虑。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 13;17(16):5874. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165874.
8
The prevalence of asthma and allergic rhinitis in Nigeria: A nationwide survey among children, adolescents and adults.尼日利亚哮喘和过敏性鼻炎的流行情况:一项针对儿童、青少年和成年人的全国性调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 13;14(9):e0222281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222281. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Kitchen PM concentrations and child acute lower respiratory infection in Bhaktapur, Nepal: The importance of fuel type.尼泊尔巴克塔普尔市厨房内的 PM 浓度与儿童急性下呼吸道感染:燃料类型的重要性。
Environ Res. 2018 Feb;161:546-553. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.056.
2
Health Effects of Ambient Air Pollution in Developing Countries.发展中国家环境空气污染对健康的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 12;14(9):1048. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091048.
3
Increased risk of respiratory illness associated with kerosene fuel use among women and children in urban Bangalore, India.印度班加罗尔市区妇女和儿童因使用煤油燃料而患呼吸道疾病的风险增加。
Occup Environ Med. 2015 Feb;72(2):114-22. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102472. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
4
An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure.一种用于估算因暴露于环境细颗粒物而导致的全球疾病负担的综合风险函数。
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Apr;122(4):397-403. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307049. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
5
Acute lower respiratory infection in childhood and household fuel use in Bhaktapur, Nepal.尼泊尔巴克塔普尔儿童急性下呼吸道感染与家用燃料使用情况的关系
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 May;121(5):637-42. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205491. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
6
Kerosene: a review of household uses and their hazards in low- and middle-income countries.煤油:家庭用途及其在中低收入国家的危害综述。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2012;15(6):396-432. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2012.710134.
7
A community survey of the pattern and determinants of household sources of energy for cooking in rural and urban south western, Nigeria.尼日利亚西南部农村和城市家庭烹饪能源来源模式及决定因素的社区调查。
Pan Afr Med J. 2012;12:2. Epub 2012 May 3.
8
Tuberculosis and indoor biomass and kerosene use in Nepal: a case-control study.尼泊尔的结核病与室内生物质和煤油使用:一项病例对照研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Apr;118(4):558-64. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901032.
9
Indoor air pollution and its impact on children under five years old in Bangladesh.孟加拉国的室内空气污染及其对五岁以下儿童的影响。
Indoor Air. 2007 Aug;17(4):297-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00477.x.
10
Increased risk of allergy associated with the use of kerosene fuel in the home.在家中使用煤油燃料会增加过敏风险。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Nov 1;164(9):1660-4. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.9.2103101.