Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Prevention and Health Promotion Research Network (redIAPP), 08007 Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 5;19(3):1813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031813.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of physical activity in the primary prevention of anxiety. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. RCTs were searched in seven electronic databases. We included RCTs that assessed either the incidence of anxiety or the reduction of anxiety symptoms which excluded participants with baseline anxiety. Measurements were required to have been made using validated instruments. Objective or subjective (with validated questionnaires) verification of the performance of physical activity was required. Three reviewers carried out the search, selection, data extraction, and risk assessment of Cochrane Collaboration's tool simultaneously and independently, reaching an agreement in their discrepancies by consensus. In addition, a meta-analysis of fixed-effects model was carried out. Three RCTs met inclusion criteria, comprising 350 patients from 3 different countries. A meta-analysis was performed using five comparisons extracted from the selected studies, and the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) was -0.18 (95% CI: -0.44; 0.07), = 0.158. The heterogeneity was irrelevant, I = 17.7% ( = 0.30). There is no evidence that anxiety can be prevented through physical activity, although the quality of evidence was very low.
本研究旨在评估身体活动在预防焦虑症中的有效性。我们进行了一项系统的随机对照试验(RCT)综述。在七个电子数据库中搜索了 RCT。我们纳入了评估焦虑症发生率或焦虑症状减轻的 RCT,排除了基线时有焦虑症的参与者。需要使用经过验证的工具进行测量。需要客观或主观(使用经过验证的问卷)验证身体活动的执行情况。三位审稿人同时且独立地进行了搜索、选择、数据提取和 Cochrane 协作工具的风险评估,通过共识解决了分歧。此外,还进行了固定效应模型的荟萃分析。三项 RCT 符合纳入标准,包括来自 3 个不同国家的 350 名患者。从选定的研究中提取了 5 个比较进行荟萃分析,合并后的标准化均数差(SMD)为-0.18(95%CI:-0.44;0.07), = 0.158。异质性不相关,I = 17.7%( = 0.30)。没有证据表明身体活动可以预防焦虑症,尽管证据质量非常低。