• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更全面的性教育降低了青少年的出生率:准实验证据。

More comprehensive sex education reduced teen births: Quasi-experimental evidence.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, New York University, New York, NY 10012

Department of Sociology, New York University, New York, NY 10012.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 22;119(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113144119.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2113144119
PMID:35165192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8872707/
Abstract

Women in the United States are much more likely to become mothers as teens than those in other rich countries. Teen births are particularly likely to be reported as unintended, leading to debate over whether better information on sex and contraception might lead to reductions in teen births. We contribute to this debate by providing causal evidence at the population level. Our causal identification strategy exploits county-level variation in the timing and receipt of federal funding for more comprehensive sex education and data on age-specific teen birth rates at the county level constructed from birth certificate natality data covering all births in the United States. Our results show that federal funding for more comprehensive sex education reduced county-level teen birth rates by more than 3%. Our findings thus complement the mixed evidence to date from randomized control trials on teen pregnancies and births by providing population-level causal evidence that federal funding for more comprehensive sex education led to reductions in teen births.

摘要

美国女性成为青少年母亲的比例远高于其他发达国家。青少年生育尤其可能被报告为意外怀孕,这引发了关于更好的性知识和避孕措施是否会减少青少年生育的争论。我们通过在人口层面提供因果证据来推动这场争论。我们的因果识别策略利用了县一级联邦资金用于更全面的性教育的时间和接受情况的差异,以及从涵盖美国所有出生数据的出生证明出生率数据构建的县级特定年龄青少年出生率数据。我们的结果表明,联邦资金用于更全面的性教育使县级青少年出生率降低了 3%以上。因此,我们的发现补充了迄今为止关于青少年怀孕和生育的随机对照试验的混合证据,提供了人口层面的因果证据,表明联邦资金用于更全面的性教育导致了青少年生育的减少。

相似文献

1
More comprehensive sex education reduced teen births: Quasi-experimental evidence.更全面的性教育降低了青少年的出生率:准实验证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 22;119(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113144119.
2
Why is the teen birth rate in the United States so high and why does it matter?为什么美国的青少年生育率如此之高,这又为什么很重要?
J Econ Perspect. 2012 Spring;26(2):141-66. doi: 10.1257/jep.26.2.141.
3
Trends in Repeat Births and Use of Postpartum Contraception Among Teens - United States, 2004-2015.2004 - 2015年美国青少年重复生育及产后避孕使用情况趋势
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Apr 28;66(16):422-426. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6616a3.
4
Prepregnancy contraceptive use among teens with unintended pregnancies resulting in live births - Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2004-2008.青少年计划外妊娠活产的孕前避孕措施使用情况——妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS),2004-2008 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Jan 20;61(2):25-9.
5
Do State-Based Policies Have an Impact on Teen Birth Rates and Teen Abortion Rates in the United States?美国基于州的政策对青少年生育率和青少年堕胎率有影响吗?
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Oct;28(5):354-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
6
Vital signs: births to teens aged 15-17 years--United States, 1991-2012.生命体征:1991-2012 年美国 15-17 岁青少年生育情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Apr 11;63(14):312-8.
7
Teen pregnancy: an update.青少年怀孕:最新情况
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;26(5):355-9. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000102.
8
The Effects of State-Mandated Abstinence-Based Sex Education on Teen Health Outcomes.州政府强制推行的基于禁欲的性教育对青少年健康结果的影响。
Health Econ. 2017 Apr;26(4):403-420. doi: 10.1002/hec.3315. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
9
Teen childbearing trends: which tide turned when and why?青少年生育趋势:何时以及为何出现转折?
Pediatrics. 1998 Nov;102(5):1205-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.5.1205.
10
Teen pregnancy and the achievement gap among urban minority youth.青少年怀孕与城市少数族裔青年之间的成就差距。
J Sch Health. 2011 Oct;81(10):614-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00635.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of sex education among college students: A case study of a medical school.大学生对性教育的认知:以一所医学院校为例
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 19;15(4):102624. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i4.102624.
2
Appraisal of Sexual Education Curriculum in Secondary Schools With Inclusion of Practical Implications and Evaluation, Based on Rural-Urban Residence.基于城乡居住情况对中学性教育课程的评估,包括实际影响和评价。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 19;17(3):e80845. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80845. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Federated difference-in-differences with multiple time periods in DataSHIELD.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex education and contraceptive use of adolescent and young adult females in the United States: an analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth 2011-2017.美国青少年及青年女性的性教育与避孕措施使用情况:基于2011 - 2017年全国家庭成长调查的分析
Contracept X. 2020 Nov 20;2:100048. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100048. eCollection 2020.
2
Three Decades of Research: The Case for Comprehensive Sex Education.三十年研究:全面性教育的案例。
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Jan;68(1):13-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.036. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
3
Beyond the Great Recession: Labor Market Polarization and Ongoing Fertility Decline in the United States.
DataSHIELD中多时间段的联邦双重差分法
iScience. 2024 Oct 9;27(11):111025. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111025. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
4
Forbidden Conversations: A Comprehensive Exploration of Taboos in Sexual and Reproductive Health.禁忌话题:性与生殖健康领域禁忌的全面探究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 12;16(8):e66723. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66723. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Classroom Voices: Youth Perspectives to Direct School-based Sexual Health Education.课堂之声:青少年对学校性健康教育的指导意见
Sex Educ. 2024;24(4):479-496. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2023.2218267. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
6
Prevalence and Factors Associated With Adolescent Pregnancy Among an Indigenous Ethnic Group in Rural Nepal: A Community-based Cross-sectional Study.尼泊尔农村一个土著族群青少年妊娠的流行情况及其相关因素:一项基于社区的横断面研究。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2024 May;57(3):269-278. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.24.023. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
7
Protocol for designing and evaluating an undergraduate public health course on sexual and reproductive health at a public university in California.加利福尼亚一所公立大学本科性与生殖健康公共卫生课程的设计与评估方案。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 27;10(8):e28503. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28503. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
8
Use of infant simulators as an aid in pregnancy and parenting educational interventions for school-aged students: a scoping review.使用婴儿模拟器作为学龄学生妊娠和育儿教育干预的辅助手段:范围综述。
Health Educ Res. 2024 Jul 18;39(4):351-374. doi: 10.1093/her/cyae012.
9
Trends in prevalence and factors associated with unintended pregnancies in Zambia (2001-2018).赞比亚 2001-2018 年意外妊娠发生率及相关因素的变化趋势。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 21;24(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06311-7.
10
Need for Sexual, Reproductive, and Mental Health Promotion Among Diverse College Students in a COVID-19 Era.新冠疫情时期多元化大学生群体的性健康、生殖健康和心理健康促进需求
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2023 Dec;26(4):1077-1096. doi: 10.1007/s10567-023-00460-5. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
大衰退之后:美国劳动力市场两极分化与持续的生育率下降
Demography. 2019 Aug;56(4):1463-1493. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00790-6.
4
Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention: Meta-Analysis of Federally Funded Program Evaluations.青少年妊娠预防:联邦基金项目评估的荟萃分析。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Apr;109(4):e1-e8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304925. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
5
Funding for Abstinence-Only Education and Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention: Does State Ideology Affect Outcomes?禁欲教育和青少年怀孕预防的资金投入:国家意识形态是否会影响结果?
Am J Public Health. 2019 Mar;109(3):497-504. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304896. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
6
Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis.美国妇女堕胎需要旅行的距离方面的差异和随时间的变化:一项空间分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Nov;2(11):e493-e500. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30158-5. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage: An Updated Review of U.S. Policies and Programs and Their Impact.禁欲至婚姻:美国政策与项目及其影响的最新综述。
J Adolesc Health. 2017 Sep;61(3):273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.05.031.
8
The Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program (2010-2015): Synthesis of Impact Findings.青少年怀孕预防计划(2010 - 2015年):影响结果综述
Am J Public Health. 2016 Sep;106(S1):S9-S15. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303367.
9
Scalability of an Evidence-Based Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Program: New Evidence From 5 Cluster-Randomized Evaluations of the Teen Outreach Program.基于证据的青少年怀孕预防项目的可扩展性:青少年拓展项目5项整群随机评估的新证据
Am J Public Health. 2016 Sep;106(S1):S32-S38. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303307.
10
Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Programs and Research: A Time To Revisit Theory.青少年怀孕预防项目与研究:重新审视理论的时候了。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Sep;106(S1):S28-S29. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303333.