Epidemiology and Health Research Laboratory, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council of Italy, Pisa, Italy.
Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Addiction. 2022 Aug;117(8):2273-2282. doi: 10.1111/add.15843. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Previous research has identified numerous risk and protective factors of adolescent problematic gaming (PG) at the individual and social levels; however, the influence of socio-economic indicators on PG is less known. This study aimed to measure the contribution of individual and socio-economic factors involved in PG risk among adolescents from 30 European countries.
Multi-level logistic regression analysis of survey data from the 2019 European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD) cross-sectional study using self-administered anonymous questionnaires.
Thirty European countries.
A representative cohort of 15-16-year-old students (n = 88 998 students; males = 49.2%).
The primary outcome measure was adolescents' (low and high) risk of PG. Individual key predictors included self-report assessments of socio-demographic characteristics, time spent gaming and family variables (parental regulation and monitoring, family support). Main country-level predictors comprised Gini coefficient for economic inequalities and benefits for families and children (% gross domestic product), retrieved from international public data sets and national thematic reports. The data analysis plan involved multi-level logistic regression.
Participants who reported stronger parental regulation [odds ratio (OR) = 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.79-0.83] and higher family support (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.91-0.95) reported lower risk of PG. At the country-level, economic inequalities (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.03-1.07) were positively associated with the risk of PG, while benefits for families and children (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70-0.89) were negatively correlated with the risk of PG.
Supportive family environments, lower country-level economic inequalities and higher government expenditures on benefits for families and children appear to be associated with a lower risk of problematic gaming among European adolescents.
之前的研究已经确定了个体和社会层面上许多与青少年问题性游戏(PG)相关的风险和保护因素;然而,社会经济指标对 PG 的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在衡量欧洲 30 个国家青少年 PG 风险相关的个体和社会经济因素的贡献。
使用自我管理的匿名问卷,对 2019 年欧洲学校酒精和其他药物调查项目(ESPAD)的横断面研究中的调查数据进行多水平逻辑回归分析。
欧洲 30 个国家。
一个具有代表性的 15-16 岁学生队列(n=88998 名学生;男性=49.2%)。
主要结果是青少年(低和高)PG 风险。个体关键预测因素包括社会人口统计学特征、游戏时间和家庭变量(父母监管和监测、家庭支持)的自我报告评估。主要国家层面的预测因素包括从国际公共数据集和国家专题报告中获取的经济不平等的基尼系数和家庭与儿童的福利(国内生产总值的百分比)。数据分析计划包括多水平逻辑回归。
报告父母监管较强(比值比[OR]=0.81,95%置信区间[CI]=0.79-0.83)和家庭支持较高(OR=0.93,95% CI=0.91-0.95)的参与者报告 PG 风险较低。在国家层面,经济不平等(OR=1.05,95% CI=1.03-1.07)与 PG 风险呈正相关,而家庭和儿童福利(OR=0.78,95% CI=0.70-0.89)与 PG 风险呈负相关。
支持性的家庭环境、较低的国家层面经济不平等和较高的政府用于家庭和儿童福利的支出似乎与欧洲青少年问题性游戏的风险降低有关。