Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Nov 3;192(11):1811-1819. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac031.
This commentary focuses on research that has long been at the core of environmental epidemiology: studies of the health effects of air pollution. It highlights publications in the American Journal of Epidemiology going back more than 50 years that have contributed to the debate about the validity of this research and its meaning for public policy. Technological advances have greatly expanded the toolbox of environmental epidemiologists in terms of measuring and analyzing complex exposures in large populations. Yet, discussions about biases in estimating air pollution health effects have always been and remain intense. Epidemiologists have brought new methodologies and concepts to this research, alleviating some but not all concerns. Here, the focus is on seminal epidemiologic work that established valid links between air pollution exposures and health outcomes and generated data for environmental policies and prevention. With this commentary, I hope to inspire epidemiologists to address many more of the burning environmental health questions-wildfires included-with a similar scientific doggedness. The rapidly changing conditions of our planet are challenging us to innovate and offer solutions, albeit perhaps a little bit faster this time around.
空气污染对健康影响的研究。它重点介绍了《美国流行病学杂志》(American Journal of Epidemiology)回溯 50 多年的相关出版物,这些出版物推动了关于这项研究的有效性及其对公共政策意义的争论。技术进步极大地扩展了环境流行病学家在大规模人群中测量和分析复杂暴露的工具包。然而,关于空气污染健康影响估计中的偏差的讨论一直以来都很激烈,而且仍然存在。流行病学家为这项研究带来了新的方法和概念,缓解了一些但并非所有的担忧。在这里,重点关注的是具有开创性的流行病学工作,这些工作确立了空气污染暴露与健康结果之间的有效联系,并为环境政策和预防提供了数据。通过这篇评论,我希望激励更多的流行病学家以类似的科学执着精神,解决更多关于环境健康的热点问题——包括野火问题。我们星球瞬息万变的状况要求我们创新并提供解决方案,尽管这一次可能要快一些。