Suppr超能文献

利用数字 2D 和 3D 成像技术检测和监测牙菌斑水平。

Detecting and monitoring dental plaque levels with digital 2D and 3D imaging techniques.

机构信息

Department of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, Dental Clinic of the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Division for Cariology, Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Center for Dental Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Feb 15;17(2):e0263722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263722. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Detecting and monitoring dental plaque is an important issue in research and clinical practice. In this context, new digital imaging methods that permit permanent documentation of the clinical findings could be promising tools. The aim of the study was therefore to investigate whether disclosed plaque can be reliably visualised on 2D and 3D images captured with digital intraoral imaging devices. Clinical examination was the reference method. Twenty subjects (27.5±1.2 years) were included and plaque was measured at three different stages: habitual plaque (T1), after 72 h without oral hygiene (T2) and after a subsequent habitual brushing exercise (T3). At each time point, plaque was disclosed followed by the clinical examination and capturing the 2D and 3D images (intraoral-camera CS 1500 and intraoral-scanner CS 3600; Carestream Dental, Germany). Plaque amounts were recorded on oral and vestibular surfaces of the Ramfjord-teeth (16, 21, 24, 36, 41, 44) using the Rustogi-modified-Navy-Plaque-Index (RMNPI) and expressed as percentage of plaque-containing RMNPI areas of all RMNPI areas. At T1, percentages (mean±SD) obtained from the clinical examination, 2D and 3D images were 62.2±10.6, 65.1±10.0 and 64.4±10.6 resp. increasing to 76.9±8.0, 77.9±8.6 and 77.5±9.4 resp. at T2. After toothbrushing (T3), values decreased to 56.3±11.1, 58.2±12.1 and 61.2±10.8 resp. All methods were able to show statistically significant changes in plaque amounts at the different time points with in part statistically significant but minor differences between them. The Bland-Altmann analysis revealed a good agreement between values from both 2D and 3D images with the clinical examination. The agreement of the scores obtained with the both image-based methods for the single RMNPI areas with the clinical examination was mainly classified as substantial to almost perfect. Amounts of plaque can be reliably detected and monitored on 2D images from an intraoral camera and on 3D images from an intraoral scanner.

摘要

检测和监测牙菌斑是研究和临床实践中的一个重要问题。在这种情况下,新的数字成像方法可以永久记录临床发现,这可能是一种很有前途的工具。因此,本研究的目的是调查数字口腔内成像设备获取的 2D 和 3D 图像是否能可靠地显示已暴露的牙菌斑。临床检查是参考方法。共纳入 20 名受试者(27.5±1.2 岁),在三个不同阶段测量菌斑:习惯性菌斑(T1)、72 小时不进行口腔卫生(T2)后和随后进行习惯性刷牙后(T3)。在每个时间点,用菌斑显示剂处理牙菌斑后,进行临床检查和 2D 和 3D 图像采集(CS 1500 口腔内相机和 CS 3600 口腔内扫描仪;Carestream Dental,德国)。使用 Rustogi 改良海军菌斑指数(RMNPI)记录 Ramfjord 牙(16、21、24、36、41、44)的颊面和舌面菌斑量,并表示为所有 RMNPI 区域中含菌斑 RMNPI 区域的百分比。在 T1 时,临床检查、2D 和 3D 图像获得的百分比(平均值±标准差)分别为 62.2±10.6、65.1±10.0 和 64.4±10.6。在 T2 时,百分比分别增加至 76.9±8.0、77.9±8.6 和 77.5±9.4。刷牙后(T3),百分比分别降至 56.3±11.1、58.2±12.1 和 61.2±10.8。所有方法均能在不同时间点显示菌斑量的统计学显著变化,其中部分方法之间存在统计学显著但较小的差异。Bland-Altman 分析显示,2D 和 3D 图像与临床检查之间的相关性良好。两种基于图像的方法在单个 RMNPI 区域上的评分与临床检查的相关性主要为高度一致至几乎完全一致。从口腔内相机的 2D 图像和口腔内扫描仪的 3D 图像上可以可靠地检测和监测菌斑量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2c/8846510/8a902695af18/pone.0263722.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验