• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Politicization and COVID-19 vaccine resistance in the U.S.美国的政治化与新冠疫苗抵制
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2022;188(1):81-100. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
2
The Politicization of the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠大流行的政治化。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1458:125-143. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-61943-4_9.
3
Individual health behaviours to combat the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from HIV socio-behavioural science.个人健康行为以应对 COVID-19 大流行:来自 HIV 社会行为科学的经验教训。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Aug;24(8):e25771. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25771.
4
Effects of politicized media coverage: Experimental evidence from the HPV vaccine and COVID-19.政治化媒体报道的影响:HPV 疫苗和 COVID-19 的实验证据。
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2022;188(1):101-134. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.11.008. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
5
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Building a Public Twitter Data Set of Antivaccine Content, Vaccine Misinformation, and Conspiracies.社交媒体上对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫:构建一个关于反疫苗内容、疫苗错误信息和阴谋论的公共 Twitter 数据集。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 17;7(11):e30642. doi: 10.2196/30642.
6
Vaccine Hesitancy and Exposure to Misinformation: a Survey Analysis.疫苗犹豫与错误信息暴露:一项调查分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):179-187. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07171-z. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
7
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media-Challenges and Mitigation Before, During, and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Literature Review.社交媒体上健康类错误信息的流行情况-在新冠疫情之前、期间和之后的挑战和缓解措施:范围文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 19;26:e38786. doi: 10.2196/38786.
8
Understanding COVID-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK.理解背景下的 COVID-19 错误信息和疫苗犹豫:英国布拉德福德公民参与的定性研究结果。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1158-1167. doi: 10.1111/hex.13240. Epub 2021 May 4.
9
The social experience of participation in a COVID-19 vaccine trial: Subjects' motivations, others' concerns, and insights for vaccine promotion.参与 COVID-19 疫苗试验的社会体验:受试者的动机、他人的担忧,以及对疫苗推广的见解。
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 22;39(17):2445-2451. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.036. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
10
SARS-CoV-2 variants and the global pandemic challenged by vaccine uptake during the emergence of the Delta variant: A national survey seeking vaccine hesitancy causes.SARS-CoV-2 变体和疫苗接种率在 Delta 变体出现期间面临的全球大流行:一项旨在寻找疫苗犹豫原因的全国性调查。
J Infect Public Health. 2022 Jul;15(7):773-780. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The Spectrum of Hesitancy in COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Pregnant Latinas on the United States-Mexico Border.美国-墨西哥边境地区怀孕的拉丁裔女性在新冠疫苗接种方面的犹豫情况
Womens Reprod Health (Phila). 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1080/23293691.2025.2500352.
2
Weaving a public health network: Process and results from an evaluation of CDC's Prevention Research Centers Vaccine Confidence Network.构建公共卫生网络:疾病预防控制中心预防研究中心疫苗信心网络评估的过程与结果
Vaccine. 2025 Aug 21;60 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):127636. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127636.
3
Preparing for future pandemics: A qualitative exploration of social media in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine hesitancy.为未来的大流行做准备:鉴于新冠疫情和疫苗犹豫,对社交媒体进行的定性探索。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 7;5(7):e0004317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004317. eCollection 2025.
4
Public perceptions of AI science and scientists relatively more negative but less politicized than general and climate science.公众对人工智能科学及科学家的看法相对更负面,但与对普通科学和气候科学的看法相比,政治化程度更低。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Jun 17;4(6):pgaf163. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf163. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Vaccine fatigue and influenza vaccination trends across Pre-, Peri-, and Post-COVID-19 periods in the United States using epic's cosmos database.利用Epic的Cosmos数据库分析美国在新冠疫情前、疫情期间和疫情后各阶段的疫苗接种疲劳及流感疫苗接种趋势。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 17;20(6):e0326098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326098. eCollection 2025.
6
Analysis of the Political Viewpoint of Policy Statements From Professional Medical Organizations Using ChatGPT With GPT-4: Cross-Sectional Study.使用ChatGPT与GPT-4对专业医学组织政策声明的政治观点进行分析:横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 13;9:e66204. doi: 10.2196/66204.
7
Towards an estimate of the impact of censorship on biomedical literature.对审查制度对生物医学文献影响的评估
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jul 1;32(7):1199-1205. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf089.
8
Can we convince the unvaccinated to vaccinate: lessons from COVID-19 vaccination.我们能说服未接种疫苗的人去接种疫苗吗:来自新冠疫苗接种的经验教训
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 7;25(1):1689. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22911-0.
9
Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccination Among Unvaccinated and Under-Vaccinated African American/Black and Latine Frontline Essential Workers: A Qualitative Exploration.未接种和未充分接种疫苗的非裔美国/黑人及拉丁裔一线 essential workers 对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的看法:一项定性探索。 注:这里“essential workers”直译为“必要工作者”,结合语境可能是“一线关键工作者”之类更合适的表达,但按要求不做额外解释,保留原文。
AIDS Behav. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04708-9.
10
Beliefs in Misinformation About COVID-19 and the Russian Invasion of Ukraine Are Linked: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Survey Study.关于新冠疫情的错误信息信念与俄罗斯对乌克兰的入侵信念有关联:来自一项全国代表性调查研究的证据。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Mar 10;5:e62913. doi: 10.2196/62913.

本文引用的文献

1
Framing the Origins of COVID-19.构建新冠病毒的起源框架。
Sci Commun. 2020 Oct;42(5):562-585. doi: 10.1177/1075547020953603.
2
Politicization and Polarization in COVID-19 News Coverage.新冠疫情新闻报道中的政治化与两极分化。
Sci Commun. 2020 Oct;42(5):679-697. doi: 10.1177/1075547020950735.
3
The ephemeral effects of fact-checks on COVID-19 misperceptions in the United States, Great Britain and Canada.美国、英国和加拿大新冠错误认知的短暂性事实核查效应。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Feb;6(2):236-243. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01278-3. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
4
The causes, impacts and countermeasures of COVID-19 "Infodemic": A systematic review using narrative synthesis.2019冠状病毒病“信息疫情”的成因、影响及应对措施:一项采用叙述性综合法的系统评价
Inf Process Manag. 2021 Nov;58(6):102713. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102713. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
5
The tangled history of mRNA vaccines.信使核糖核酸疫苗的复杂历史。
Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7876):318-324. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02483-w.
6
Evolving threat.不断演变的威胁。
Science. 2021 Aug 20;373(6557):844-849. doi: 10.1126/science.373.6557.844.
7
Elite party cues increase vaccination intentions among Republicans.精英党派暗示增加共和党人的疫苗接种意愿。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 10;118(32). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106559118.
8
Ongoing global and regional adaptive evolution of SARS-CoV-2.SARS-CoV-2 在全球和区域范围内持续的适应性进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jul 20;118(29). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104241118. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
9
Politicizing COVID-19 Vaccines in the Press: A Critical Discourse Analysis.媒体中新冠疫苗的政治化:一项批判性话语分析
Int J Semiot Law. 2022;35(3):1167-1185. doi: 10.1007/s11196-021-09857-3. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
10
After the pandemic: perspectives on the future trajectory of COVID-19.大流行之后:对 COVID-19 未来轨迹的展望。
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7873):495-504. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03792-w. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

美国的政治化与新冠疫苗抵制

Politicization and COVID-19 vaccine resistance in the U.S.

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Urban Studies Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.

出版信息

Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2022;188(1):81-100. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.10.002
PMID:35168748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8577882/
Abstract

Science is frequently used and distorted to advance political, economic, or cultural agendas. The politicization of science can limit the positive impacts that scientific advances can offer when people reject sound and beneficial scientific advice. Politicization has undoubtedly contributed to hesitancy toward uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine. It is urgent for scientists and clinicians to better understand: (1) the roots of politicization as related to COVID-19 vaccines; (2) the factors that influence people's receptivity to scientific misinformation in politicized contexts; and (3) how to combat the politicization of science to increase the use of life-saving vaccines. This chapter explores these issues in the context of COVID-19 vaccine resistance in the United States. After briefly describing the development of the vaccines, we describe the ways in which the disease itself became politicized because of statements by political leaders and also by media accounts including social media. We then review the politicization of the vaccine at both national and international scales, variability in public acceptance of the vaccines in the United States, and response to the emergence of variants. The next section summarizes social science findings on overcoming vaccine resistance, and the concluding section outlines some of the lessons of the politicization of the disease and the vaccine for health practitioners and life scientists.

摘要

科学经常被用于推进政治、经济或文化议程,并且其本身也经常被歪曲。当人们拒绝合理且有益的科学建议时,科学的政治化可能会限制科学进步带来的积极影响。科学的政治化无疑导致了人们对接种 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫不决。科学家和临床医生迫切需要更好地理解:(1)与 COVID-19 疫苗相关的政治化根源;(2)在政治化背景下影响人们接受科学错误信息的因素;以及(3)如何对抗科学的政治化,以增加救命疫苗的使用。本章在美国探讨了 COVID-19 疫苗抵制的背景下对这些问题的研究。在简要描述疫苗的开发之后,我们描述了由于政治领导人的言论以及包括社交媒体在内的媒体报道,疾病本身是如何被政治化的。然后,我们回顾了疫苗在国家和国际层面的政治化、美国公众对疫苗的接受程度的差异,以及对变体出现的反应。下一节总结了克服疫苗抵制的社会科学发现,最后一节概述了疾病和疫苗的政治化对卫生从业人员和生命科学家的一些教训。