WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 16;12(2):e048195. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048195.
A comprehensive WHO standards-based tool to measure women's perceived quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in health facilities is needed to allow for comparisons of data across settings and over time. This paper describes the development of such a tool, and its validation in Italy.
A multiphase, mixed-methods study involving qualitative and quantitative research methods.
Nine health facilities in Italy.
The questionnaire was developed in six phases: (1) Defining the scope, characteristics and a potential list of measures for the tool; (2) initial content and construct validation; (3) first field testing to assess acceptability and perceived utility for end-users (1244 women, 35 decision makers) and further explore construct validity; (4) content optimisation and score development; (5) assessment of face validity, intrarater reliability and internal consistency and (6) second field testing in nine maternity hospitals (4295 women, 78 decision-makers).
The final version of the tool included 116 questions accounting for 99 out of the 350 of the extended lists of WHO Quality Measures. Observed face validity was very good, with 100% agreement for 101 (87%) questions and Kappa exceeding 0.60 for remaining ones. Reliability was good, with either high agreement or Kappa exceeding 0.60 for all items. Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.84 to 0.88, indicating very good internal consistency. Acceptability across seven hospitals was good (mean response rate: 57.4%, 95% CI 44.4% to 70.5%). The questionnaire proved to be useful, driving the development of actions plan to improve the QMNC in each facility.
Study findings suggest that the tool has good content, construct, face validity, intrarater reliability and internal consistency, while being acceptable and useful. Therefore, it could be used in health facilities in Italy and similar context. More research should investigate how effectively use the tool in different countries for improving the QMNC.
需要一种全面的、基于世卫组织标准的工具来衡量妇女在卫生机构中对母婴保健(QMNC)的感知质量,以便在不同环境和时间进行数据比较。本文描述了这种工具的开发及其在意大利的验证。
一个多阶段、混合方法研究,涉及定性和定量研究方法。
意大利的 9 家卫生机构。
问卷分六个阶段开发:(1)确定工具的范围、特征和潜在的测量指标列表;(2)初始内容和结构验证;(3)第一次实地测试,以评估最终用户(1244 名妇女,35 名决策者)的可接受性和感知效用,并进一步探索结构有效性;(4)内容优化和评分开发;(5)评估表面有效性、内部一致性和内部可靠性;(6)在 9 家妇产医院进行第二次实地测试(4295 名妇女,78 名决策者)。
工具的最终版本包括 116 个问题,涵盖了世卫组织质量指标扩展清单中的 99 个。观察到的表面有效性非常好,对于 101 个(87%)问题,有 100%的一致性,其余问题的 Kappa 值超过 0.60。可靠性良好,所有项目的一致性或 Kappa 值均超过 0.60。Cronbach alpha 值范围在 0.84 到 0.88 之间,表明具有非常好的内部一致性。在 7 家医院的可接受性良好(平均回复率:57.4%,95%可信区间为 44.4%至 70.5%)。问卷被证明是有用的,推动了每个设施改善 QMNC 的行动计划的制定。
研究结果表明,该工具具有良好的内容、结构、表面有效性、内部一致性和可靠性,同时具有可接受性和有用性。因此,它可以在意大利和类似背景下的卫生机构中使用。更多的研究应该调查如何在不同国家有效地使用该工具来改善 QMNC。