Zhu Dan, Dai Xiaoqing, Wang Jingbo, Zhang Chunye, Tao Xiaofeng, Wu Lizhong, Zhu Ling
Department of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Pathology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 31;11:792554. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.792554. eCollection 2021.
To assess computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of intramuscular hemangiomas (IMHs) in oral and maxillofacial region and correlate them with the histopathological classifications for selecting optimum management.
The clinical data and pretreatment findings of 32 patients with pathologically proven IMHs on CT (n = 10), MRI (n = 27), or both (n = 5) were analyzed retrospectively. Correspondence of clinical and imaging characters with 3 different pathological classifications (cavernous, capillary, and mixed) of IMHs was studied. A number of pitfalls and overlap of imaging features can result in misdiagnosis of different IMHs lesions.
Four patients had multi-muscular lesions, and 28 had single-muscular lesions. The predilection site were the tongue (11 cases, 34.4%) and the masseter muscle (10 cases, 31.2%). Cavernous type (17 cases, 53.1%) was the most common IMHs type. All patients showed slightly hypointense or isointense on T1-weighted imaging, 3 patients showed hyperintense on T2-weighted imaging and the others showed slightly hyperintense. The most common enhancement pattern was progressive (29 cases, 90.6%). The capillary type (9 cases, 28.1%) and mixed type (6 cases, 28.1%) of IMHs on imaging indicated characteristics of lesions with rich blood supply status, the cavernous type (17cases, 53.1%) of IMHs belonged to relatively poor blood supply lesions. A total of 5 patients (15.6%) were initially misdiagnosed, there were recurrences in 4 IMHs patients. Extra functional MRI (fMRI) was performed on these 5 misdiagnosed patients, the average ADC of the 5 patients was 1.50 × 10 mm/s. The presence of vermicular vessels was different among these three types of IMHs.
The reason for the misdiagnosis in localized IMHs may be the obvious border of mass-like lesions and the lack of enlarged vessels. Combined evaluation of presence of vermicular vessels and fMRI might be more accurately for determining the IMHs and create a preoperative plan.
评估口腔颌面部肌内血管瘤(IMHs)的计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)表现,并将其与组织病理学分类相关联,以选择最佳治疗方案。
回顾性分析32例经病理证实的IMHs患者的临床资料及CT(n = 10)、MRI(n = 27)或两者(n = 5)的治疗前检查结果。研究临床和影像学特征与IMHs的3种不同病理分类(海绵状、毛细血管状和混合型)的对应关系。多种成像特征的陷阱和重叠可导致不同IMHs病变的误诊。
4例患者有多处肌肉病变,28例有单处肌肉病变。好发部位为舌(11例,34.4%)和咬肌(10例,31.2%)。海绵状型(17例,53.1%)是最常见的IMHs类型。所有患者在T1加权成像上均表现为轻度低信号或等信号,3例在T2加权成像上表现为高信号,其余表现为轻度高信号。最常见的强化方式为渐进性强化(29例,90.6%)。影像学上毛细血管型(9例,28.1%)和混合型(6例,28.1%)的IMHs表现为血供丰富的病变特征,海绵状型(17例,53.1%)的IMHs属于血供相对较差的病变。共有5例患者(15.6%)最初被误诊,4例IMHs患者出现复发。对这5例误诊患者进行了额外的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)检查,这5例患者的平均表观扩散系数(ADC)为1.50×10⁻³mm²/s。这三种类型的IMHs中蠕虫状血管的表现不同。
局限性IMHs误诊的原因可能是肿块样病变边界明显且缺乏血管增粗。联合评估蠕虫状血管的存在和fMRI可能更准确地诊断IMHs并制定术前计划。