Gokpinar Hasan Huseyin, Of Nur Selin, Saracoglu Ismail, Sucuoglu Hamza, Koyuncu Halil
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Kütahya, Türkiye.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Nov 28;70(4):532-544. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.13608. eCollection 2024 Dec.
This study aims to examine the effects of whole-body vibration (WBV) therapy + home-based exercise (HBE) therapy; physical therapy modalities (PTMs)+HBE; and WBV+PTM+HBE on pain severity, physical performance, and functional status in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
This single-center, single-blind, three-armed, prospective, randomized-controlled study included a total of 65 patients (3 males, 62 females; mean age: 56.0±6.3 years; range, 45 to 70 years) who were diagnosed with knee OA between February 2014 and July 2014. The participants were randomly divided into three groups. Group 1 (n=22) received WBV+HBE, Group 2 (n=22) received WBV+PTM+HBE, and Group 3 (n=21) received PTM+HBE alone. The primary outcome measure was functional physical performance, while the secondary outcome measures were pain intensity and functional status. All the measurements were evaluated by a single blinded investigator before and after treatment.
All the functional physical performance tests (p<0.01), pain intensity (p<0.01), and functional status (p<0.01) showed statistically significant effects in terms of time and group × time interaction, but no significant difference was observed among the groups (p>0.05). We observed statistically and clinically significant improvement in all of the functional physical performance tests, pain, and functional status for Group 2. There was a statistically and clinically significant improvement only in the functional physical performance tests for Group 1. In Group 3, no clinical or statistical significance was achieved in any outcome measurements.
Treatment program consisting of WBV+PTM+HBE can yield clinically and statistically favorable results by improving all of the pain, functional status and physical performance parameters of the patients with knee OA, while WBV+HBE can be clinically and statistically effective only in the physical performance parameters of the patients.
本研究旨在探讨全身振动(WBV)疗法+家庭锻炼(HBE)疗法、物理治疗方式(PTM)+HBE以及WBV+PTM+HBE对膝骨关节炎(OA)患者疼痛严重程度、身体机能和功能状态的影响。
本单中心、单盲、三臂、前瞻性、随机对照研究共纳入65例患者(3例男性,62例女性;平均年龄:56.0±6.3岁;范围45至70岁),这些患者于2014年2月至2014年7月期间被诊断为膝OA。参与者被随机分为三组。第1组(n=22)接受WBV+HBE,第2组(n=22)接受WBV+PTM+HBE,第3组(n=21)仅接受PTM+HBE。主要结局指标为功能性身体机能,次要结局指标为疼痛强度和功能状态。所有测量均由一名单盲研究者在治疗前后进行评估。
所有功能性身体机能测试(p<0.01)、疼痛强度(p<0.01)和功能状态(p<0.01)在时间以及组×时间交互作用方面均显示出统计学显著效应,但组间未观察到显著差异(p>0.05)。我们观察到第2组在所有功能性身体机能测试、疼痛和功能状态方面均有统计学和临床显著改善。第1组仅在功能性身体机能测试方面有统计学和临床显著改善。在第3组中,任何结局测量均未达到临床或统计学显著性。
由WBV+PTM+HBE组成的治疗方案可通过改善膝OA患者的所有疼痛、功能状态和身体机能参数,产生临床和统计学上有利的结果,而WBV+HBE仅在患者的身体机能参数方面具有临床和统计学有效性。