• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危高血压患者血压控制的充分性:DEGREE 研究。

Adequacy of blood pressure control in high-risk hypertensive patients: The DEGREE study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2022 Apr 1;352:137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.02.014. Epub 2022 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.02.014
PMID:35176408
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension is a modifiable risk factor in patients at the highest risk for cardiovascular events. New invasive treatment options are becoming available that might be particularly appealing for high-risk patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of high-risk patients on routine therapy that do not meet guideline recommended ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) targets.

METHODS

This single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Erasmus University Medical Center (Rotterdam, The Netherlands). Inclusion criteria were: (1) age 18-80 years, (2) drugs prescribed for hypertension or history of hypertension and (3) high cardiovascular risk as defined according to the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) guidelines. Patients underwent standardized office blood pressure (OBP) and same-day 24-h ABP measurements. Blood pressure (BP) control was defined according to the 2018 ESC/ESH and 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were enrolled (median age 71 years, 35% female). Mean OBP was 142.2/81.9 ± 18.6/12.6 mmHg and mean 24-h ABP was 126.1/70.1 ± 14.3/9.2 mmHg. Patients were on 2.0 [25th-75th percentile: 1.0-3.3] Defined Daily Doses of antihypertensive drugs. ESC/ESH guideline 24-h ABP and OBP targets were not met in 41.8% (95%CI: 31.5-52.6%) and 52.7% (95%CI: 42.0-63.3%), respectively. ACC/AHA guideline 24-h ABP and OBP targets were not met in 59.3% (95%CI: 48.5-69.5%) and 79.1% (95%CI: 69.3-86.9%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

BP remains uncontrolled in 40-60% of high-risk hypertensive patients despite routine use of guideline-recommended therapy. Our findings support the search towards novel invasive BP lowering treatment options.

摘要

简介

高血压是心血管事件高危患者的可改变风险因素。新的侵入性治疗选择正在出现,这对高危患者可能特别有吸引力。因此,本研究的目的是确定在接受常规治疗的高危患者中,有多少患者的血压未达到指南推荐的动态血压(ABP)目标。

方法

这项单中心、横断面研究在伊拉斯谟大学医学中心(荷兰鹿特丹)进行。纳入标准为:(1)年龄 18-80 岁,(2)开有治疗高血压的药物或有高血压病史,(3)根据欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会(ESC/ESH)指南定义的高心血管风险。患者接受标准化诊室血压(OBP)和同日 24 小时 ABP 测量。血压(BP)控制根据 2018 ESC/ESH 和 2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)指南定义。

结果

共纳入 100 例患者(中位年龄 71 岁,35%为女性)。平均 OBP 为 142.2/81.9 ± 18.6/12.6 mmHg,平均 24 小时 ABP 为 126.1/70.1 ± 14.3/9.2 mmHg。患者服用 2.0 [25-75 百分位:1.0-3.3]定义日剂量的抗高血压药物。ESC/ESH 指南 24 小时 ABP 和 OBP 目标的未达标率分别为 41.8%(95%CI:31.5-52.6%)和 52.7%(95%CI:42.0-63.3%)。ACC/AHA 指南 24 小时 ABP 和 OBP 目标的未达标率分别为 59.3%(95%CI:48.5-69.5%)和 79.1%(95%CI:69.3-86.9%)。

结论

尽管常规使用指南推荐的治疗方法,但仍有 40-60%的高危高血压患者血压未得到控制。我们的研究结果支持寻找新的侵入性降压治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Adequacy of blood pressure control in high-risk hypertensive patients: The DEGREE study.高危高血压患者血压控制的充分性:DEGREE 研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Apr 1;352:137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.02.014. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
2
Impact of the European and American guidelines on hypertension prevalence, treatment, and cardiometabolic goals.欧美指南对高血压患病率、治疗和心血管代谢目标的影响。
J Hypertens. 2019 Jul;37(7):1393-1400. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002065.
3
Diagnostic Performance of Office versus Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Kidney Transplant Recipients.移植肾功能受者诊室血压与动态血压诊断性能的比较。
Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(7):548-558. doi: 10.1159/000517358. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
4
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: is it mandatory for blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients?: prospective observational study.动态血压监测:对于接受治疗的高血压患者的血压控制是否必不可少?前瞻性观察性研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.209. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
5
Blood Pressure Targets Achievement According to 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines in Three European Excellence Centers for Hypertension.根据2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会指南,三个欧洲卓越高血压中心的血压目标达成情况
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020 Feb;27(1):51-59. doi: 10.1007/s40292-020-00359-0. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Prevalence of ambulatory blood pressure phenotypes using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure guideline thresholds: data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study.使用 2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会血压指南阈值评估动态血压表型的患病率:来自年轻人冠状动脉风险发展研究的数据。
J Hypertens. 2019 Jul;37(7):1401-1410. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002055.
7
Comparative Analysis of American Heart Association and European Society of Hypertension Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds for Diagnosing Hypertension in Children.美国心脏协会与欧洲高血压学会儿童高血压诊断动态血压阈值的比较分析
Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Jan 30;5(5):611-617. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.01.017. eCollection 2020 May.
8
Accuracy of screening strategies for masked hypertension: a large-scale nationwide study based on home blood pressure monitoring.隐匿性高血压筛查策略的准确性:一项基于家庭血压监测的全国性大规模研究。
Hypertens Res. 2023 Mar;46(3):742-750. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-01103-y. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
9
Cardiovascular events according to blood pressure thresholds recommended by ACC/AHA.根据 ACC/AHA 推荐的血压阈值的心血管事件。
Blood Press. 2024 Dec;33(1):2380346. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2024.2380346. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
10
Potential Impact of 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guideline on Contemporary Practice: A Cross-Sectional Analysis From NCDR PINNACLE Registry.2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会高血压指南对当代实践的潜在影响:来自 NCDR PINNACLE 注册的横断面分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 7;11(11):e024107. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024107. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term safety and efficacy of endovascular ultrasound renal denervation in resistant hypertension: 8-year results from the ACHIEVE study.血管内超声肾去神经术治疗顽固性高血压的长期安全性和有效性:ACHIEVE研究的8年结果
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Oct 23. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02555-7.
2
Quality-of-life and beliefs about medication in relation to a therapy adherence intervention in resistant hypertension: the Resistant HYpertension: MEasure to ReaCh Targets trial.与耐药性高血压治疗依从性干预相关的生活质量和药物信念:耐药性高血压:达到目标的测量试验。
J Hypertens. 2024 Oct 1;42(10):1687-1694. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003780. Epub 2024 May 23.
3
The position of renal denervation in treatment of hypertension: an expert consensus statement.
肾去神经术在高血压治疗中的地位:专家共识声明
Neth Heart J. 2023 Jan;31(1):3-11. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01717-4. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
4
Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing renal sympathetic denervation.接受肾交感神经切除术患者的长期随访。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Nov;111(11):1256-1268. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02056-5. Epub 2022 Jul 18.