Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110000, People's Republic of China.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Feb 10;17:317-327. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S341648. eCollection 2022.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is under diagnosis in China. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of six COPD screening questionnaires for the early detection of COPD.
We recruited patients aged ≥35 years, presenting at the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University in 2021. All participants completed the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ), Revised COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (Revised-CDQ), COPD Population Screener (COPD-PS), COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ), COPD Assessment in Primary Care to Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk (CAPTURE), and Lung Function Questionnaire (LFQ). The patients underwent spirometry testing with further bronchodilator testing for those with FEV/FVC values of <0.70. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were drawn for each questionnaire. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive (PPV), negative predictive (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) values of the optimal cut-off and previously reported scores were estimated and compared.
Of 909 patients who completed the six screening questionnaires and spirometry testing, 330 patients were newly diagnosed with COPD. AUC values for the LFQ, Revised CDQ, COPD-PS, CDQ, COPD-SQ, and CAPTURE were 0.785 (95% confidence interval: 0.752-0.812), 0.762 (0.727-0.795), 0.745 (0.707-0.778), 0.731 (0.695-0.762), 0.703 (0.671-0.734), and 0.667 (0.635-0.702), respectively. The optimal cut-off scores for CDQ, Revised-CDQ, COPD-PS, COPD-SQ, CAPTURE, and LFQ were: 19, 19, 5, 17, 3, and 16 points, respectively. Compared with the previously recommended values, the present cut-off values for the CAPTURE and LFQ had better screening accuracy. The LFQ performed better than the CDQ, COPD-SQ, or CAPTURE. The Revised CDQ performed better than CAPTURE or COPD-SQ. The COPD-PS performed better than CAPTURE.
All six questionnaires can discriminate between subjects with or without COPD. The LFQ performed particularly well. The CAPTURE and LFQ scores of 3 and 16 have better screening accuracy than the scores previously reported.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)在中国的诊断不足。本研究旨在评估 6 种 COPD 筛查问卷对 COPD 的早期检测的准确性。
我们招募了 2021 年在中国医科大学第一附属医院就诊的年龄≥35 岁的患者。所有参与者均完成 COPD 诊断问卷(CDQ)、修订版 COPD 诊断问卷(修订版-CDQ)、COPD 人群筛查问卷(COPD-PS)、COPD 筛查问卷(COPD-SQ)、COPD 在初级保健中用于识别未诊断的呼吸道疾病和加重风险的评估(CAPTURE)和肺功能问卷(LFQ)。对所有患者进行肺量计检查,对于 FEV/FVC 值<0.70 的患者进行进一步的支气管扩张剂检查。为每个问卷绘制了受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)。估计并比较了最佳截断值和先前报告评分的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和曲线下面积(AUC)值。
在完成了 6 种筛查问卷和肺量计检查的 909 名患者中,有 330 名患者被新诊断为 COPD。LFQ、修订版 CDQ、COPD-PS、CDQ、COPD-SQ 和 CAPTURE 的 AUC 值分别为 0.785(95%置信区间:0.752-0.812)、0.762(0.727-0.795)、0.745(0.707-0.778)、0.731(0.695-0.762)、0.703(0.671-0.734)和 0.667(0.635-0.702)。CDQ、修订版-CDQ、COPD-PS、COPD-SQ、CAPTURE 和 LFQ 的最佳截断分数分别为:19、19、5、17、3 和 16 分。与之前推荐的值相比,CAPTURE 和 LFQ 的本截断值具有更好的筛查准确性。LFQ 比 CDQ、COPD-SQ 或 CAPTURE 表现更好。修订版-CDQ 比 CAPTURE 或 COPD-SQ 表现更好。COPD-PS 比 CAPTURE 表现更好。
这 6 种问卷都可以区分有或没有 COPD 的患者。LFQ 表现特别好。CAPTURE 和 LFQ 的 3 分和 16 分的评分比之前报告的评分具有更好的筛查准确性。