• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人心理社会平衡量表中文版简式问卷:效度与信度研究

The Chinese Inventory of Psychosocial Balance Short-Form Questionnaire for the Older Adults: Validity and Reliability Study.

作者信息

Chen Pei-Yun, Ho Wen-Chao, Lo Chyi, Yeh Tzu-Pei

机构信息

Department of Public Health, China Medical University (Taiwan), Taichung, Taiwan.

School of Nursing, China Medical University (Taiwan), Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 1;13:799967. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.799967. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.799967
PMID:35178013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8844501/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drawing from Erikson's theory, Domino and Affonso constructed the Inventory of Psychosocial Balance (IPB), a scale with satisfactory reliability and validity. However, the lack of a credible Chinese version of the scale may hinder research on ego development in Taiwan. The aim of the present study was to construct a short form Chinese IPB. In addition, factor analysis was employed to shorten the original 120-item scale to make it suitable for application in the older adults in the future.

METHODS

The study involved three steps: The first step was to establish the 120-items of the Chinese Inventory of Psychosocial Balance (C-IPB), and we conducted translation, back-translation, expert validity, and reliability of pilot study for this step. Following the first step was to construct the short-form C-IPB (CIPB-SF) in the second step, and the CIPB-SF was developed item analysis and factor analysis. Finally, we assessed the reliability and validity of the CIPB-SF structural equation model in the third step.

RESULTS

Three hundred eight older adults without cognitive disorder completed the IPB. The 40-item CIPB-SF was completed through item analysis and factor analysis. The internal consistency test of CIPB-SF and the eight stages were good (Cronbach's α = 0.81-0.89). The CIPB-SF had acceptable validity, except in the intimacy and identity stages, in which validity was only fair. Compared with the IPB, the CIPB-SF had good reliability and acceptable validity. However, because of its conciseness, the 40-item CIPB-SF was more suited for application among the Chinese elderly population because its application avoids physical overload.

CONCLUSION

The CIPB-SF served as a concise scale for assessing ego development in our study. This scale can also serve as a useful tool for convenient screening in the future.

摘要

背景

借鉴埃里克森的理论,多米诺和阿方索构建了心理社会平衡量表(IPB),该量表具有令人满意的信效度。然而,缺乏可信的中文版量表可能会阻碍台湾地区自我发展的研究。本研究的目的是构建中文版简短版IPB。此外,采用因素分析来缩短原始的120个条目的量表,使其适合未来在老年人中应用。

方法

该研究包括三个步骤:第一步是建立中文版心理社会平衡量表(C-IPB)的120个条目,我们为此步骤进行了翻译、回译、专家效度和预试验的信度检验。第一步之后,在第二步构建简短版C-IPB(CIPB-SF),通过项目分析和因素分析来开发CIPB-SF。最后,在第三步中,我们使用结构方程模型评估CIPB-SF的信效度。

结果

308名无认知障碍的老年人完成了IPB。通过项目分析和因素分析完成了40个条目的CIPB-SF。CIPB-SF及其八个阶段的内部一致性检验良好(克朗巴哈α系数=0.81-0.89)。CIPB-SF具有可接受的效度,除了亲密和同一性阶段,其效度仅为中等。与IPB相比,CIPB-SF具有良好的信度和可接受的效度。然而,由于其简洁性,40个条目的CIPB-SF更适合在中国老年人群中应用,因为其应用避免了身体负担过重。

结论

在我们的研究中,CIPB-SF是一种用于评估自我发展的简洁量表。该量表也可作为未来方便筛查的有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca89/8844501/5c62b437b08e/fpsyg-13-799967-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca89/8844501/a23377fdc1c8/fpsyg-13-799967-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca89/8844501/b8205f70bdee/fpsyg-13-799967-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca89/8844501/5c62b437b08e/fpsyg-13-799967-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca89/8844501/a23377fdc1c8/fpsyg-13-799967-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca89/8844501/b8205f70bdee/fpsyg-13-799967-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca89/8844501/5c62b437b08e/fpsyg-13-799967-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Chinese Inventory of Psychosocial Balance Short-Form Questionnaire for the Older Adults: Validity and Reliability Study.老年人心理社会平衡量表中文版简式问卷:效度与信度研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 1;13:799967. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.799967. eCollection 2022.
2
[Reliability and validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese version used in an elderly population of Zhejiang province in China].[简明健康状况调查量表(SF-36)中文版在中国浙江省老年人群中的信度和效度]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Dec;29(12):1193-8.
3
Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF-C).多维疲劳症状量表-短式中文版(MFSI-SF-C)的信度和效度。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Aug;20(15-16):2224-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03691.x. Epub 2011 May 25.
4
The Hausa 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12): Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation in mixed urban and rural Nigerian populations with chronic low back pain.《豪萨 12 项简短健康调查(SF-12)》:在患有慢性下腰痛的混合城乡尼日利亚人群中进行翻译、跨文化调适和验证。
PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232223. eCollection 2020.
5
Chinese version of the Constant-Murley questionnaire for shoulder pain and disability: a reliability and validation study.用于肩痛和功能障碍的Constant-Murley问卷中文版:一项信效度研究
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Sep 18;15(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0752-3.
6
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
7
A cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2: Chinese version in patients with chronic visceral pain.简式麦吉尔疼痛问卷-2的跨文化调适与验证:慢性内脏痛患者的中文版
J Pain Res. 2017 Jan 5;10:121-128. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S116997. eCollection 2017.
8
Psychometric properties and normative data of the childhood trauma questionnaire-short form in Chinese adolescents.中国青少年版儿童创伤问卷简表的心理测量学特性及常模数据
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 27;14:1130683. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130683. eCollection 2023.
9
Validity and reliability of the Traditional Chinese version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory in general population.多维疲劳量表中文繁体版在一般人群中的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0189850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189850. eCollection 2018.
10
Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity of the SF-36 health survey in people who abuse heroin.对滥用海洛因者进行的SF-36健康调查的数据质量、缩放假设、信度和结构效度测试。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2014 Apr;113(4):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a risk perception scale on acute respiratory infections for caregivers in long-term care facilities.长期护理机构中护理人员急性呼吸道感染风险认知量表的编制与验证
Front Public Health. 2025 May 2;13:1527905. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1527905. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating the reliability and validity of the geriatric assessment of disability scale in older adults undergoing hemodialysis.评估老年透析患者残疾评定量表的信度和效度。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05869-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Descriptive phenomenological study on ego-integrity among older people in nursing homes.养老院老年人自我完整性的描述现象学研究。
Nurs Health Sci. 2020 Jun;22(2):472-479. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12715. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
2
Generativity affects fear of death through ego integrity in German, Czech, and Cameroonian older adults.代际传承通过自我完整感影响德国、捷克和喀麦隆老年人的死亡恐惧。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Jul-Aug;77:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
3
Early and Midlife Predictors of Wisdom and Subjective Well-Being in Old Age.
老年时期智慧和主观幸福感的早期和中年期预测因素。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Oct 10;73(8):1514-1525. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby017.
4
Forgiveness and late life functioning: the mediating role of finding ego-integrity.宽恕与晚年功能:寻找自我完整性的中介作用。
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Feb;23(2):238-245. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1399346. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
5
Psychometric Characteristics of a Patient Reported Outcome Measure on Ego-Integrity and Despair among Cancer Patients.癌症患者自我完整性与绝望感的患者报告结局指标的心理测量学特征
PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0156003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156003. eCollection 2016.
6
Assessment of Mental Status.精神状态评估
Neurol Clin. 2016 Feb;34(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2015.08.001.
7
The Relation of Ego Integrity and Despair to Personality Traits and Mental Health.自我整合与绝望感与人格特质及心理健康的关系。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 May 1;72(3):400-407. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv062.
8
A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus.对问卷跨文化调适指南的回顾未能达成共识。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
9
Forgiveness, Ego-Integrity, and Depressive Symptoms in Community-Dwelling and Residential Elderly Adults.社区居住和机构养老老年人的宽恕、自我完整性与抑郁症状
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 Sep;71(5):786-97. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu146. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
10
The relationship between major depression and nonsuicide mortality for U.S. adults: the importance of health behaviors.美国成年人中重度抑郁症与非自杀死亡率之间的关系:健康行为的重要性。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Jul;69(4):622-32. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu009. Epub 2014 Feb 25.