Cong Xiangfeng, Liu Shaobo, Wang Wenjuan, Ma Jixiang, Li Jianhong
National Center for Chronic and Non-communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 100050, Beijing, China.
Office of Non-Communicable Diseases and Ageing Health Management, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 102206, Beijing, China.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12756-2.
In China, few studies have examined the relationship between the combination of body mass index and waist circumference and the risk of stroke. Moreover, the relationship may also be different in different genders. Thus, we investigated the association between the combination of body mass index and waist circumference and the risk of stroke in Chinese.
This prospective cohort study included 36 632 participants aged 18 to 90 years. Participants were recruited from 60 surveillance sites (25 urban sites and 35 rural sites) across China in 2010 China Chronic Disease Risk Factor Surveillance, and followed up in 2016-2017. Incident cases of stroke were identified through questionnaires (including the basis of clinical diagnosis, imaging tests, time of diagnosis, diagnosis unit) and Cardiovascular Event Report System. Risk factors for stroke were collected at baseline using questionnaire, physical measurements and laboratory tests. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to generate adjusted hazard ratios and 95%CI. All analyses were duplicated by gender stratification.
During 6.42 ± 0.50 years of follow-up, 1 333 (597 males, 736 females) stroke events were observed among the 27 112 participants who did not have cardiovascular diseases at baseline. Compared with the general population who have normal weight or underweight with normal WC, those who have normal weight or underweight with abdominal obesity (adjusted hazard ratios 1.45, 95%CI 1.07-1.97 in males; 0.98, 95%CI 0.78-1.24 in females), overweight with abdominal obesity (1.41, 95%CI 1.14-1.75 in males; 1.33, 95%CI 1.10-1.61 in females), obesity with abdominal obesity (1.46, 95%CI 1.11-1.91 in males; 1.46, 95%CI 1.17-1.81 in females). Overweight with normal WC was found to be not statistically significant for both males and females (all P>0.05). Subgroup analysis found a multiplicative interaction between age and anthropometric group in females (P for interaction <0.05). Sensitivity analysis results did not change. In the subjects with CVD risk factors, we found a similar relationship as in the general population .
Combined assessment of body mass index and waist circumference identifies obesity patterns associated with stroke risk.
在中国,很少有研究探讨体重指数与腰围的组合与中风风险之间的关系。此外,这种关系在不同性别中可能也有所不同。因此,我们调查了中国人群中体重指数与腰围的组合与中风风险之间的关联。
这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了36632名年龄在18至90岁之间的参与者。参与者于2010年中国慢性病危险因素监测中从全国60个监测点(25个城市点和35个农村点)招募,并于2016 - 2017年进行随访。通过问卷(包括临床诊断依据、影像检查、诊断时间、诊断单位)和心血管事件报告系统确定中风的发病病例。在基线时使用问卷、体格测量和实验室检查收集中风的危险因素。使用Cox比例风险回归模型生成调整后的风险比和95%置信区间。所有分析均按性别分层重复进行。
在6.42±0.50年的随访期间,在基线时没有心血管疾病的27112名参与者中观察到1333例(597例男性,736例女性)中风事件。与体重正常或体重不足且腰围正常的普通人群相比,体重正常或体重不足但腹部肥胖的人群(男性调整后风险比为1.45,95%置信区间为1.07 - 1.97;女性为0.98,95%置信区间为0.78 - 1.24),超重且腹部肥胖的人群(男性为1.41,95%置信区间为1.14 - 1.75;女性为1.33,95%置信区间为1.10 - 1.61),肥胖且腹部肥胖的人群(男性为1.46,95%置信区间为1.11 - 1.91;女性为1.46,95%置信区间为1.17 - 1.81)。超重且腰围正常的人群在男性和女性中均无统计学意义(所有P>0.05)。亚组分析发现女性年龄与人体测量组之间存在相乘交互作用(交互作用P<0.05)。敏感性分析结果未改变。在有心血管疾病危险因素的受试者中,我们发现了与普通人群相似的关系。
体重指数和腰围的联合评估可识别与中风风险相关的肥胖模式。