• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在面对大流行时,动态调整病例报告政策以最大化隐私和公共卫生效益。

Dynamically adjusting case reporting policy to maximize privacy and public health utility in the face of a pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):853-863. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac011.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocac011
PMID:35182149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9006705/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Supporting public health research and the public's situational awareness during a pandemic requires continuous dissemination of infectious disease surveillance data. Legislation, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and recent state-level regulations, permits sharing deidentified person-level data; however, current deidentification approaches are limited. Namely, they are inefficient, relying on retrospective disclosure risk assessments, and do not flex with changes in infection rates or population demographics over time. In this paper, we introduce a framework to dynamically adapt deidentification for near-real time sharing of person-level surveillance data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The framework leverages a simulation mechanism, capable of application at any geographic level, to forecast the reidentification risk of sharing the data under a wide range of generalization policies. The estimates inform weekly, prospective policy selection to maintain the proportion of records corresponding to a group size less than 11 (PK11) at or below 0.1. Fixing the policy at the start of each week facilitates timely dataset updates and supports sharing granular date information. We use August 2020 through October 2021 case data from Johns Hopkins University and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to demonstrate the framework's effectiveness in maintaining the PK11 threshold of 0.01.

RESULTS

When sharing COVID-19 county-level case data across all US counties, the framework's approach meets the threshold for 96.2% of daily data releases, while a policy based on current deidentification techniques meets the threshold for 32.3%.

CONCLUSION

Periodically adapting the data publication policies preserves privacy while enhancing public health utility through timely updates and sharing epidemiologically critical features.

摘要

目的

在大流行期间支持公共卫生研究和公众的态势感知需要不断传播传染病监测数据。立法,如 1996 年的《健康保险流通与责任法案》和最近的州级法规,允许共享去识别个人级别的数据;然而,目前的去识别方法是有限的。也就是说,它们效率低下,依赖于回顾性的披露风险评估,并且不能随着感染率或人口统计数据的变化而灵活调整。在本文中,我们介绍了一个框架,用于为实时共享个人级别的监测数据动态调整去识别。

材料和方法

该框架利用模拟机制,能够在任何地理级别应用,以预测在广泛的泛化策略下共享数据的重新识别风险。这些估计为每周的前瞻性政策选择提供信息,以维持 PK11(记录对应于 11 人以下的群体大小的比例)等于或低于 0.1 的比例。在每周开始时固定政策,便于及时更新数据集,并支持共享粒度日期信息。我们使用约翰霍普金斯大学和疾病控制与预防中心 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 10 月的案例数据来演示该框架在维持 0.01 的 PK11 阈值方面的有效性。

结果

当在所有美国县共享 COVID-19 县一级的案例数据时,该框架的方法满足 96.2%的每日数据发布的阈值,而基于当前去识别技术的政策满足 32.3%的阈值。

结论

定期调整数据发布政策在保护隐私的同时,通过及时更新和共享流行病学关键特征,增强公共卫生的效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/628f/9006705/46d740809e29/ocac011f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/628f/9006705/92c7822d0401/ocac011f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/628f/9006705/fd99f6f99b48/ocac011f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/628f/9006705/c4fa78deb3c7/ocac011f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/628f/9006705/127970245a06/ocac011f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/628f/9006705/46d740809e29/ocac011f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/628f/9006705/92c7822d0401/ocac011f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/628f/9006705/fd99f6f99b48/ocac011f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/628f/9006705/c4fa78deb3c7/ocac011f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/628f/9006705/127970245a06/ocac011f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/628f/9006705/46d740809e29/ocac011f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamically adjusting case reporting policy to maximize privacy and public health utility in the face of a pandemic.在面对大流行时,动态调整病例报告政策以最大化隐私和公共卫生效益。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):853-863. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac011.
2
Supporting COVID-19 Disparity Investigations with Dynamically Adjusting Case Reporting Policies.用动态调整病例报告政策支持 COVID-19 差异调查。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:279-288. eCollection 2022.
3
Sharing ICU Patient Data Responsibly Under the Society of Critical Care Medicine/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Joint Data Science Collaboration: The Amsterdam University Medical Centers Database (AmsterdamUMCdb) Example.在重症医学学会/欧洲危重病医学学会联合数据科学协作下负责任地共享 ICU 患者数据:阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心数据库(AmsterdamUMCdb)示例。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;49(6):e563-e577. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004916.
4
US Privacy Laws Go Against Public Preferences and Impede Public Health and Research: Survey Study.美国隐私法违背公众偏好,阻碍公共卫生和研究:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 5;23(7):e25266. doi: 10.2196/25266.
5
Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Patients' Data in China: Case Study.中国患者数据隐私风险评估:案例研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Feb 5;8(2):e13046. doi: 10.2196/13046.
6
Some examples of privacy-preserving sharing of COVID-19 pandemic data with statistical utility evaluation.一些具有统计效用评估的 COVID-19 大流行数据隐私保护共享的例子。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 May 19;23(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01927-3.
7
PanDa Game: Optimized Privacy-Preserving Publishing of Individual-Level Pandemic Data Based on a Game Theoretic Model.熊猫游戏:基于博弈论模型的个体级大流行病数据优化隐私保护发布。
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2023 Oct;22(4):808-817. doi: 10.1109/TNB.2023.3284092. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
8
Technical and policy approaches to balancing patient privacy and data sharing in clinical and translational research.在临床和转化研究中平衡患者隐私与数据共享的技术和政策方法。
J Investig Med. 2010 Jan;58(1):11-8. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e3181c9b2ea.
9
Regulatory Frameworks for Clinical Trial Data Sharing: Scoping Review.监管框架临床试验数据共享:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 4;24(5):e33591. doi: 10.2196/33591.
10
Addressing Privacy Concerns in Sharing Viral Sequences and Minimum Contextual Data in a Public Repository During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在新冠疫情期间解决公共数据库中病毒序列和最小背景数据共享中的隐私问题。
Front Genet. 2022 Mar 24;12:716541. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.716541. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Private Continuous Survival Analysis with Distributed Multi-Site Data.具有分布式多站点数据的私有连续生存分析
Proc IEEE Int Conf Big Data. 2023 Dec;2023:5444-5453. doi: 10.1109/BigData59044.2023.10386571.
2
PanDa Game: Optimized Privacy-Preserving Publishing of Individual-Level Pandemic Data Based on a Game Theoretic Model.熊猫游戏:基于博弈论模型的个体级大流行病数据优化隐私保护发布。
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2023 Oct;22(4):808-817. doi: 10.1109/TNB.2023.3284092. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
3
Supporting COVID-19 Disparity Investigations with Dynamically Adjusting Case Reporting Policies.

本文引用的文献

1
Protecting Privacy and Transforming COVID-19 Case Surveillance Datasets for Public Use.保护隐私并转换 COVID-19 病例监测数据集以进行公共使用。
Public Health Rep. 2021 Sep-Oct;136(5):554-561. doi: 10.1177/00333549211026817. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
2
Massive Google-funded COVID database will track variants and immunity.谷歌资助的大型新冠数据库将追踪病毒变种和免疫情况。
Nature. 2021 Feb 24. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00490-5.
3
Enabling realistic health data re-identification risk assessment through adversarial modeling.通过对抗建模实现现实健康数据重新识别风险评估。
用动态调整病例报告政策支持 COVID-19 差异调查。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:279-288. eCollection 2022.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):744-752. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa327.
4
The COVID-19 pandemic preparedness simulation tool: CovidSIM.《COVID-19 大流行准备模拟工具:CovidSIM》。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;20(1):859. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05566-7.
5
Epidemiologic surveillance for controlling Covid-19 pandemic: types, challenges and implications.流行病学监测在控制新冠疫情大流行中的应用:类型、挑战和意义。
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Nov;13(11):1630-1638. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.07.019. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Why the United States is having a coronavirus data crisis.为何美国正面临新冠病毒数据危机。
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7823):13-14. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02478-z.
7
Comorbidity and its Impact on Patients with COVID-19.合并症及其对COVID-19患者的影响。
SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;2(8):1069-1076. doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00363-4. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
8
The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): Rationale, design, infrastructure, and deployment.国家 COVID 队列协作组织(N3C):原理、设计、基础设施和部署。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 1;28(3):427-443. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa196.
9
A need for open public data standards and sharing in light of COVID-19.鉴于新冠疫情,对开放公共数据标准和共享的需求。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;21(4):e80. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30635-6. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
10
A novel Monte Carlo simulation procedure for modelling COVID-19 spread over time.一种用于对 COVID-19 随时间传播进行建模的新型蒙特卡罗模拟程序。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 4;10(1):13120. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70091-1.