• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短期医疗使命指南:来自东道国的观点。

Guidelines for short-term medical missions: perspectives from host countries.

机构信息

Trent Fleming School of Nursing, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Dr, Peterborough, ON, K9L 0G2, Canada.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Global Health. 2022 Feb 19;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00815-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12992-022-00815-7
PMID:35183205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8857875/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, there has been increasing guideline development for short-term medical missions (STMMs) traveling from high-income to low- and middle-income countries for the purpose of supporting health care services. The ethics of STMMs is criticized in the literature and there is frequently a lack of host country collaboration. This typically results in guidelines which are developed through the lens of the sending (high-income) countries' staff and organizations. The aim of this paper is to evaluate an existing best practice guideline document from the perspective of host country participants with knowledge of STMMs from Honduras, Malawi, and the Philippines.

METHODS

The guideline used for the evaluation consisted of nine best practice elements that were discerned based on literature and the experience of those working within the field. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a cross-sectional study with participants (n = 118) from the host countries. Thematic analysis was conducted by two researchers and the results were assessed by working group members to confirm interpretations of the data.

RESULTS

Overall, participants expressed a strong interest in having more structured guidance surrounding STMM practices. There was a positive response to and general acceptance of the proposed STMM guidelines, although participants found the 24-page document onerous to use; a companion checklist was developed. The key themes that emerged from the interviews included collaboration and coordination, care for hard-to-reach communities, capacity building, critical products and essential medical supplies, and opportunity and feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Host input suggests that the guidelines provide structured regulation and coordination of the medical mission process and have the potential to improve the way STMMs are carried out. The guidelines have also proven to be a useful tool for the actual implementation of STMMs and can be a tool to strengthen links and trust between mission teams and local health staff. However, local contexts vary considerably, and guidelines must be adapted for local use. It is recommended that STMM teams work in conjunction with host partners to ensure they meet local needs, increase capacity development of local health workers, and provide continuity of care for patients into the local system.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,越来越多的短期医学使命(STMM)从高收入国家前往中低收入国家,目的是支持医疗服务,相关指导方针也在不断发展。STMM 的伦理道德在文献中受到批评,而且往往缺乏东道国的合作。这通常导致指导方针是通过派遣(高收入)国家的工作人员和组织的视角制定的。本文的目的是从洪都拉斯、马拉维和菲律宾有 STMM 经验的东道国参与者的角度评估现有的最佳实践指导方针文件。

方法

用于评估的指南由基于文献和该领域工作人员经验的九个最佳实践要素组成。采用横断面研究对来自东道国的参与者(n=118)进行半结构式访谈。两位研究人员进行主题分析,工作组成员评估分析结果以确认对数据的解释。

结果

总体而言,参与者对更具结构性的 STMM 实践指导表现出浓厚兴趣。参与者对拟议的 STMM 指南表示积极响应和普遍接受,尽管他们认为 24 页的文件过于繁琐;随后制定了一份配套检查表。访谈中出现的主要主题包括合作与协调、为难以到达的社区提供服务、能力建设、关键产品和基本医疗用品,以及机会和可行性。

结论

东道国的意见表明,该指南为医疗使命过程提供了结构化的监管和协调,并有潜力改善 STMM 的实施方式。该指南也已被证明是实施 STMM 的有用工具,可以加强使命团队与当地卫生人员之间的联系和信任。然而,当地情况差异很大,因此必须根据当地情况调整指南。建议 STMM 团队与东道国合作伙伴合作,确保满足当地需求,加强当地卫生工作者的能力发展,并为患者提供进入当地系统的持续护理。

相似文献

1
Guidelines for short-term medical missions: perspectives from host countries.短期医疗使命指南:来自东道国的观点。
Global Health. 2022 Feb 19;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00815-7.
2
Short-term volunteer health trips: aligning host community preferences and organizer practices.短期志愿者健康之旅:使东道社区偏好与组织者做法保持一致。
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1267957. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1267957.
3
International short-term medical missions: a systematic review of recommended practices.国际短期医疗任务:推荐做法的系统评价
Int J Public Health. 2017 Jan;62(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0889-6. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
4
Guidelines for responsible short-term global health activities: developing common principles.负责任的短期全球卫生活动指南:制定共同原则。
Global Health. 2018 Feb 7;14(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0330-4.
5
Impact and Sustainability of Foreign Medical Aid: A Qualitative Study with Honduran Healthcare Providers.外国医疗援助的影响和可持续性:对洪都拉斯医疗保健提供者的定性研究。
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 3;89(1):17. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3995. eCollection 2023.
6
Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: a methods study to evaluate quality of care.健康影响评估与短期医疗任务:一项评估医疗服务质量的方法研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jun 2;8:121. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-121.
7
Evaluating Medication Habits in Medical Mission Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.评估医疗传教患者的用药习惯:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2020 Sep 18;12(9):e10533. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10533.
8
Mete Tèt Nou Ansanm (Putting our heads together): Global health capacity building within short-term medical missions.同心协力(集思广益):短期医疗队中的全球卫生能力建设。
Glob Public Health. 2022 Jul;17(7):1252-1266. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1931400. Epub 2021 May 27.
9
Reliability of the Service Trip Audit Tool to assess the quality of short-term medical missions.服务旅行审核工具评估短期医疗任务质量的可靠性。
Int Health. 2021 Dec 1;13(6):606-614. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa006.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Time trends and advances in the management of global, regional, and national diabetes in adolescents and young adults aged 10-24 years, 1990-2021: analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021.1990 - 2021年10至24岁青少年及青年全球、区域和国家糖尿病管理的时间趋势与进展:全球疾病负担研究2021分析
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Oct 26;16(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01491-w.
2
A Cosmopolitan Argument for Temporary "Diagonal" Short-Term Surgical Missions as a Component of Surgical Systems Strengthening.将临时“对角”短期外科手术任务作为加强外科系统组成部分的全球视野论证。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Oct 29;12(5). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00046.
3
Border Health Training for Family Physicians: Is There a Need and Interest?家庭医生边境卫生培训:是否有必要和兴趣?
Fam Med. 2023 May;55(5):291-297. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2023.283488. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
4
Implementing electronic health records on a medical service trip improves the patient care process.在医疗服务之旅中实施电子健康记录可改善患者护理流程。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Sep 7;2:960427. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.960427. eCollection 2022.
5
Impact and Sustainability of Foreign Medical Aid: A Qualitative Study with Honduran Healthcare Providers.外国医疗援助的影响和可持续性:对洪都拉斯医疗保健提供者的定性研究。
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 3;89(1):17. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3995. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Decolonising global health in 2021: a roadmap to move from rhetoric to reform.2021年全球卫生去殖民化:从言辞到改革的路线图。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Mar;6(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005604.
2
Decolonizing Global Health Education: Rethinking Institutional Partnerships and Approaches.去殖民化全球健康教育:重新思考机构伙伴关系和方法。
Acad Med. 2021 Mar 1;96(3):329-335. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003473.
3
Host perspective on academic supervision, health care provision and institutional partnership during short-term electives in global health.短期全球卫生实习项目中的带教老师对学术指导、医疗服务提供和机构合作的看法
Med Educ. 2020 Apr;54(4):303-311. doi: 10.1111/medu.14027. Epub 2019 Dec 25.
4
Ethics of Short-Term Experiences in Global Health: Engaging Skeptics of Change.全球健康短期经历的伦理:应对变革怀疑论者
Ann Glob Health. 2019 Jun 17;85(1):82. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2529.
5
Not Above the Law: A Legal and Ethical Analysis of Short-Term Experiences in Global Health.《法律之下:全球健康短期体验的法律和伦理分析》
Ann Glob Health. 2019 Jun 17;85(1):79. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2451.
6
A Comprehensive Framework to Optimize Short-Term Experiences in Global Health (STEGH).全球卫生短期体验优化综合框架(STEGH)。
Global Health. 2019 Apr 2;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0469-7.
7
Contemporary issues in north-south health research partnerships: perspectives of health research stakeholders in Zambia.当代南北健康研究伙伴关系中的问题:赞比亚卫生研究利益攸关方的观点。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 15;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0409-7.
8
Applying global standards to short-term global health clinical experiences: the case of Project Salud y Paz.将全球标准应用于短期全球卫生临床体验:以“健康与和平计划”为例。
Global Health. 2019 Jan 9;15(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0445-7.
9
Ethical Obligations Regarding Short-Term Global Health Clinical Experiences: An American College of Physicians Position Paper.关于短期全球卫生临床体验的道德义务:美国医师学院立场文件。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 May 1;168(9):651-657. doi: 10.7326/M17-3361. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
10
Guidelines for responsible short-term global health activities: developing common principles.负责任的短期全球卫生活动指南:制定共同原则。
Global Health. 2018 Feb 7;14(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0330-4.