• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Zoom 上的虚拟焦点小组:两项针对黑人及非裔美国妇女和儿童的体育活动研究的“经验教训”

Virtual Focus Groups on Zoom: "Lessons Learned" from Two Physical Activity Studies among Black and African American Women and Children.

作者信息

Folk Amanda L, Grace Stephanie M, Urvig Michael, Barr-Anderson Daheia J

机构信息

School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2025;28(2):209-220. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2024.2330050. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1080/13645579.2024.2330050
PMID:40330134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12052306/
Abstract

Black and/or African American (Black/AA) individuals have been historically excluded from research, but the recent uptick in Zoom as a platform for virtual focus groups may lead to increased inclusion of Black/AA participants. Researcher reflections from two physical activity-related studies with Black/AA samples, and that utilized Zoom to conduct virtual focus groups are presented. "Lessons learned" fall under three themes: participant privacy and session security, technological challenges and time burdens, and participant engagement. Present lessons support past research in the need for participant privacy and security but add novel insights around engaging and supporting Black/AA participants in virtual focus groups. Authors stress not only the importance of participant engagement and community-building, but the lesson of flexibility and understanding of social context, even when the focus group topic may be seemingly unrelated. These lessons can be used by researchers conducting virtual focus groups, particularly when working with Black/AA populations.

摘要

历史上,黑人及非裔美国人(Black/AA)一直被排除在研究之外,但最近Zoom作为虚拟焦点小组平台的使用增加,可能会使更多Black/AA参与者被纳入研究。本文介绍了两项针对Black/AA样本的与体育活动相关的研究中研究者的反思,这两项研究利用Zoom进行虚拟焦点小组讨论。“经验教训”分为三个主题:参与者隐私和会议安全、技术挑战和时间负担、以及参与者参与度。目前的经验教训支持了以往关于参与者隐私和安全需求的研究,但在吸引和支持Black/AA参与者参与虚拟焦点小组方面提供了新的见解。作者强调不仅参与者参与和社区建设的重要性,还有灵活性以及对社会背景理解的经验教训,即使焦点小组的主题看似无关。进行虚拟焦点小组讨论的研究人员,尤其是在与Black/AA人群合作时,可以借鉴这些经验教训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2526/12052306/dffda0314776/nihms-1978117-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2526/12052306/dffda0314776/nihms-1978117-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2526/12052306/dffda0314776/nihms-1978117-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Virtual Focus Groups on Zoom: "Lessons Learned" from Two Physical Activity Studies among Black and African American Women and Children.Zoom 上的虚拟焦点小组:两项针对黑人及非裔美国妇女和儿童的体育活动研究的“经验教训”
Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2025;28(2):209-220. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2024.2330050. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Examination of Race and Autism Intersectionality Among African American/Black Young Adults.非裔美国/黑人青年中种族与自闭症交叉性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2022 Dec 1;4(4):306-314. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0091. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Conducting Virtual, Synchronous Focus Groups Among Black Sexual Minority Men: Qualitative Study.在黑人性少数群体男性中进行虚拟同步焦点小组讨论:定性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Feb 8;7(2):e22980. doi: 10.2196/22980.
4
Trust Building Recruitment Strategies for Researchers Conducting Studies in African American (AA) Churches: Lessons Learned.针对在非裔美国人(AA)教会开展研究的研究人员的信任建立招募策略:经验教训。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Dec;34(10):912-917. doi: 10.1177/1049909116666799. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Culturally Adapting an Occupational Therapy Intervention for Black American Autistic Communities.为美国黑人自闭症群体对职业治疗干预措施进行文化调适。
Am J Occup Ther. 2025 Mar 1;79(2). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2025.050910.
7
Insights About Dyadic Cancer Survivorship Interventions for Black Women and Their Caregivers: A Rapid Qualitative Analysis of Collaborator Perspectives.关于黑人女性及其照顾者的二元癌症幸存者干预措施的见解:对合作者观点的快速定性分析
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241305583. doi: 10.1177/10732748241305583.
8
Turning the Page on Breast Cancer in Ohio: Lessons learned from implementing a multilevel intervention to reduce breast cancer mortality among Black women.俄亥俄州乳腺癌防治工作的新篇章:实施多层次干预措施降低黑人女性乳腺癌死亡率的经验教训
Cancer. 2023 Sep;129(S19):3114-3127. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34845.
9
Lessons learned from a virtual Community-Based Participatory Research project: prioritizing needs of people who have diabetes and experiences of homelessness to co-design a participatory action project.从一个基于社区的虚拟参与式研究项目中吸取的经验教训:优先考虑糖尿病患者和无家可归者的需求,共同设计一个参与式行动项目。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 4;9(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00456-z.
10
Addressing Breast Cancer Equity Through Virtual Community Oncology Navigation and Engagement (vCONET).通过虚拟社区肿瘤学导航和参与(vCONET)解决乳腺癌公平问题。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241264711. doi: 10.1177/10732748241264711.

本文引用的文献

1
Asynchronous Online Focus Groups for Health Research: Case Study and Lessons Learned.用于健康研究的异步在线焦点小组:案例研究与经验教训
Int J Qual Methods. 2021 Jan-Dec;20. doi: 10.1177/1609406921990489. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Zooming into Focus Groups: Strategies for Qualitative Research in the Era of Social Distancing.聚焦焦点小组:社交距离时代的定性研究策略
ATS Sch. 2021 Feb 8;2(2):176-184. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0127PS. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Recommendations for Virtual Qualitative Health Research During a Pandemic.在大流行期间进行虚拟定性健康研究的建议。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Nov;31(13):2403-2413. doi: 10.1177/10497323211036891. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Let's talk virtual! Online focus group facilitation for the modern researcher.让我们来谈谈虚拟的吧!现代研究人员的在线焦点小组促进。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Dec;17(12):2145-2150. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
5
Conducting Virtual, Synchronous Focus Groups Among Black Sexual Minority Men: Qualitative Study.在黑人性少数群体男性中进行虚拟同步焦点小组讨论:定性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Feb 8;7(2):e22980. doi: 10.2196/22980.
6
Variation in racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 mortality by age in the United States: A cross-sectional study.美国 COVID-19 死亡率的种族/民族差异随年龄变化的情况:一项横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 20;17(10):e1003402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003402. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
ENOUGH: COVID-19, Structural Racism, Police Brutality, Plutocracy, Climate Change-and Time for Health Justice, Democratic Governance, and an Equitable, Sustainable Future.够了:新冠疫情、结构性种族主义、警察暴行、富豪统治、气候变化——是时候实现健康正义、民主治理以及一个公平、可持续的未来了。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Nov;110(11):1620-1623. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305886. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
8
The Use of Videoconferencing for Qualitative Interviewing: Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations.视频会议在定性访谈中的应用:机遇、挑战与考量
Clin Nurs Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):3-8. doi: 10.1177/1054773818803170.
9
Using Online Meeting Software to Facilitate Geographically Dispersed Focus Groups for Health Workforce Research.利用在线会议软件为卫生人力研究中的地域分散焦点小组提供便利。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Aug;28(10):1621-1628. doi: 10.1177/1049732318782167. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
10
Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations: Methodological Considerations for Online Focus Group Discussions.服务不足患者群体的敏感健康话题:在线焦点小组讨论的方法学考虑。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Aug;28(10):1658-1673. doi: 10.1177/1049732317705355. Epub 2017 May 4.