• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间的道德决策:道德判断、道德化与日常行为

Moral Decision-Making During COVID-19: Moral Judgements, Moralisation, and Everyday Behaviour.

作者信息

Francis Kathryn B, McNabb Carolyn B

机构信息

School of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.

Department of Psychology, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 4;12:769177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769177. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769177
PMID:35185677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8854988/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose significant health, economic, and social challenges. Given that many of these challenges have moral relevance, the present studies investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic is influencing moral decision-making and whether moralisation of behaviours specific to the crisis predict adherence to government-recommended behaviours. Whilst we find no evidence that utilitarian endorsements have changed during the pandemic at two separate timepoints, individuals have moralised non-compliant behaviours associated with the pandemic such as failing to physically distance themselves from others. Importantly, our findings show that this moralisation predicts sustained individual compliance with government-recommended behaviours.

摘要

新冠疫情继续带来重大的健康、经济和社会挑战。鉴于其中许多挑战具有道德相关性,本研究调查了新冠疫情是否正在影响道德决策,以及针对该危机的特定行为的道德化是否能预测对政府建议行为的遵守情况。虽然我们没有发现证据表明在两个不同时间点的疫情期间功利主义的支持度发生了变化,但个体已将与疫情相关的不遵守行为(如未能与他人保持身体距离)道德化。重要的是,我们的研究结果表明,这种道德化能预测个体持续遵守政府建议的行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bc/8854988/c5fda698cf60/fpsyg-12-769177-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bc/8854988/568ea317ad58/fpsyg-12-769177-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bc/8854988/a4ebc2404289/fpsyg-12-769177-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bc/8854988/eb3af20f5d0a/fpsyg-12-769177-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bc/8854988/7d4dbb17c97e/fpsyg-12-769177-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bc/8854988/c5fda698cf60/fpsyg-12-769177-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bc/8854988/568ea317ad58/fpsyg-12-769177-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bc/8854988/a4ebc2404289/fpsyg-12-769177-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bc/8854988/eb3af20f5d0a/fpsyg-12-769177-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bc/8854988/7d4dbb17c97e/fpsyg-12-769177-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bc/8854988/c5fda698cf60/fpsyg-12-769177-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Moral Decision-Making During COVID-19: Moral Judgements, Moralisation, and Everyday Behaviour.新冠疫情期间的道德决策:道德判断、道德化与日常行为
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 4;12:769177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769177. eCollection 2021.
2
Moral decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: Associations with age, negative affect, and negative memory.新冠疫情期间的道德决策:与年龄、负面情绪及负面记忆的关联
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 30;13:974933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974933. eCollection 2022.
3
Counter-intuitive moral judgement following traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后的反直觉道德判断
J Neuropsychol. 2018 Jun;12(2):200-215. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12117. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
4
Hippocampal Damage Increases Deontological Responses during Moral Decision Making.海马体损伤会增加道德决策过程中的道义论反应。
J Neurosci. 2016 Nov 30;36(48):12157-12167. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0707-16.2016.
5
Alcohol, empathy, and morality: acute effects of alcohol consumption on affective empathy and moral decision-making.酒精、同理心与道德:饮酒对情感同理心和道德决策的急性影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Dec;236(12):3477-3496. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05314-z. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
6
Moral Decision Making: From Bentham to Veil of Ignorance via Perspective Taking Accessibility.道德决策:从边沁到无知之幕——经由视角可及性
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 May 1;11(5):66. doi: 10.3390/bs11050066.
7
Moral responses to the COVID-19 crisis.对新冠疫情危机的道德回应。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Sep 14;8(9):210096. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210096. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements.前额叶皮质受损会增加功利主义的道德判断。
Nature. 2007 Apr 19;446(7138):908-11. doi: 10.1038/nature05631. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
9
Response time modelling reveals evidence for multiple, distinct sources of moral decision caution.响应时间建模揭示了道德决策谨慎的多个不同来源的证据。
Cognition. 2022 Jun;223:105026. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105026. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
10
Incidental disgust does not cause moral condemnation of neutral actions.偶然的厌恶不会导致对中性行为的道德谴责。
Cogn Emot. 2021 Feb;35(1):96-109. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1810639. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Sadness and Fear on Moral Judgments in Public Emergency Events.悲伤和恐惧对公共突发事件中道德判断的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 31;14(6):468. doi: 10.3390/bs14060468.
2
Intact moral decision-making in adults with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury.成年人中,中重度创伤性脑损伤后,其道德决策能力保持完整。
Brain Impair. 2023 Dec;24(3):568-585. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2022.11. Epub 2022 May 3.
3
Effects of perspective switching and utilitarian thinking on moral judgments in a sacrificial dilemma among healthcare and non-healthcare students.

本文引用的文献

1
Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,功利主义侵犯个人权利的意愿降低。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 22;16(10):e0259110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259110. eCollection 2021.
2
Don't get it or don't spread it: comparing self-interested versus prosocial motivations for COVID-19 prevention behaviors.勿受感染或勿传播:比较对 COVID-19 预防行为的自利动机与亲社会动机。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 12;11(1):20222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97617-5.
3
Trolleys, triage and Covid-19: the role of psychological realism in sacrificial dilemmas.
视角转换和功利性思维对医护专业与非医护专业学生在牺牲困境中道德判断的影响。
Curr Psychol. 2023 Feb 16:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04380-z.
4
The Relationship between Prevention and Panic from COVID-19, Ethical Principles, Life Expectancy, Anxiety, Depression and Stress.新冠疫情下的预防与恐慌、伦理原则、预期寿命、焦虑、抑郁和压力之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 11;19(10):5841. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105841.
5
Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,功利主义侵犯个人权利的意愿降低。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 22;16(10):e0259110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259110. eCollection 2021.
6
Deciding between moral priorities and COVID-19 avoiding behaviors: A moral foundations vignette study.在道德优先级与新冠疫情防范行为之间进行抉择:一项道德基础小品文研究。
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(7):5922-5938. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01941-y. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
7
Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study.新冠疫情期间一线工作者与普通人群的道德决策、压力和社会认知:一项探索性研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 19;11:588159. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588159. eCollection 2020.
8
Prevention for oneself or others? Psychological and social factors that explain social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic.为自己还是他人预防?解释 COVID-19 大流行期间社会疏远现象的心理和社会因素。
J Health Psychol. 2022 May;27(6):1342-1353. doi: 10.1177/1359105320980793. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
9
'Distancers' and 'non-distancers'? The potential social psychological impact of moralizing COVID-19 mitigating practices on sustained behaviour change.“疏远者”和“非疏远者”?对 COVID-19 缓解措施进行道德化可能对持续行为改变产生的社会心理影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;59(3):653-662. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12399. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
手推车、分诊和新冠病毒:心理现实性在牺牲困境中的作用。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Feb;36(1):137-153. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1964940. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
4
Valence framing effects on moral judgments: A meta-analysis.效价框架对道德判断的影响:一项元分析。
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104703. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104703. Epub 2021 May 6.
5
The Effect of Emotion on Prosocial Tendency: The Moderating Effect of Epidemic Severity Under the Outbreak of COVID-19.情绪对亲社会倾向的影响:COVID-19疫情爆发下疫情严重程度的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 21;11:588701. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588701. eCollection 2020.
6
Moralization of Covid-19 health response: Asymmetry in tolerance for human costs.新冠疫情应对中的道德化:对人类代价容忍度的不对称
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2021 Mar;93:104084. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104084. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
7
Motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online experiment.在 COVID-19 大流行期间激励社会隔离:一项在线实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113478. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113478. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
8
Moral foundations underlying behavioral compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间行为合规背后的道德基础。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Mar;171:110463. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110463. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
9
How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?基于国家的缓解措施将如何影响新冠疫情的发展进程?
Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):931-934. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
10
World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19).世界卫生组织宣布全球紧急状态:对 2019 年新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)的回顾。
Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034. Epub 2020 Feb 26.