Kvapil Pavel, Tomášek Oldřich, Bártová Eva, Harej Mojca, Kastelic Marjan, Primožič Tit, Kašpárková Nikola, Račnik Jožko
Ljubljana Zoo, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Department of Biology and Wildlife Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Feb 4;9:831836. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.831836. eCollection 2022.
Blood sampling is a challenging procedure in many captive animals. Although manual restraint or anesthesia are usually possible, they entail intense stress and a high risk of injuries or organ failure. Blood sampling using medicinal leeches () represents a promising non-invasive alternative to venipuncture; however, leech blood meal was to date used only for qualitative analyses such as genetic or serological screenings. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the leech blood sampling method for quantification of hematological and biochemical parameters. Medicinal leeches were manually applied on 67 zoo animals of eleven species, and control blood samples were obtained by venipuncture of the jugular vein. The leeches drew up to 20 ml of blood in 20 to 55 min. Although most hematological and biochemical parameters were significantly altered in leech-derived samples, their values showed strong ( = 0.62-0.79; 10/24 parameters) to very strong ( > 0.8; 13/24 parameters) correlations with venipuncture in all blood parameters, except for sodium ( = 0.39). As the parameter alterations and correlations were similar among species, simple cross-species regression formulas were sufficient to correct the alterations, thereby ensuring good repeatability between leeches and venipuncture in most parameters. Our data thus suggest that medicinal leeches can be used as a reliable non-invasive and stress-reducing alternative to standard venipuncture, even for quantitative assays. This opens new opportunities for a significant improvement to animal welfare in zoological gardens, conservation programmes, and ecophysiological research, where quantification of blood parameters is often needed.
在许多圈养动物中,采血是一项具有挑战性的操作。虽然通常可以进行人工约束或麻醉,但这会带来强烈的应激反应以及受伤或器官衰竭的高风险。使用药用蚂蟥进行采血是一种有前景的非侵入性静脉穿刺替代方法;然而,迄今为止,蚂蟥吸血仅用于基因或血清学筛查等定性分析。因此,本研究的目的是评估蚂蟥采血方法用于定量血液学和生化参数的适用性。将药用蚂蟥人工应用于11个物种的67只动物园动物,并通过颈静脉穿刺获取对照血样。蚂蟥在20至55分钟内可吸取多达20毫升的血液。虽然蚂蟥采集的样本中大多数血液学和生化参数有显著变化,但除钠(r = 0.39)外,所有血液参数中蚂蟥采集样本的值与静脉穿刺样本的值显示出强(r = 0.62 - 0.79;24个参数中的10个)到非常强(r > 0.8;24个参数中的13个)的相关性。由于各物种之间的参数变化和相关性相似,简单的跨物种回归公式足以校正这些变化,从而确保在大多数参数上蚂蟥采血和静脉穿刺之间具有良好的重复性。因此,我们的数据表明,药用蚂蟥可作为一种可靠的非侵入性且能减轻应激的标准静脉穿刺替代方法,甚至适用于定量检测。这为动物园、保护计划和生态生理学研究中的动物福利显著改善带来了新机遇,这些领域常常需要对血液参数进行定量分析。