• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非常早期重复结肠镜检查中肠道准备不充分患者的漏诊病变发生率。

Prevalence of missed lesions in patients with inadequate bowel preparation through a very early repeat colonoscopy.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2022 Sep;34(6):1176-1184. doi: 10.1111/den.14278. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1111/den.14278
PMID:35189669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9545231/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

When bowel preparation (BP) is inadequate, international guidelines recommend repeating the colonoscopy within 1 year to avoid missing clinically relevant lesions. We aimed to determine the rate of missed lesions in patients with inadequate BP through a very early repeat colonoscopy with adequate BP.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis was conducted using data collected from a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial including patients with inadequate BP and then repeat colonoscopy. Inadequate BP was defined as the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score <2 points in any segment. We included patients with any indication for colonoscopy. The adenoma detection rate (ADR), advanced ADR (AADR), and serrated polyp detection rate (SPDR) were calculated for index and repeat colonoscopies.

RESULTS

Of the 651 patients with inadequate BP from the original trial, 413 (63.4%) achieved adequate BP on repeat colonoscopy. The median interval between index and repeat colonoscopies was 28 days. On repeat colonoscopy, the ADR was 45.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 40.5-50.1%), the AADR was 10.9% (95% CI 8.1-14.3%), and the SPDR was 14.3% (95% CI 10.9-17.7%). Cancer was discovered in four patients (1%; 95% CI 0.2-2.5%). A total of 60.2% of all advanced adenoma (AA) were discovered on repeat colonoscopy. A colon segment scored BBPS = 0 had most AA (66.1%) and all four cancers.

CONCLUSION

Patients with inadequate BP present a high rate of AAs on repeat colonoscopy. When a colonoscopy has a colon segment score BBPS = 0, we recommend repeating the colonoscopy as soon as possible.

摘要

目的

当肠道准备(BP)不充分时,国际指南建议在 1 年内重复结肠镜检查,以避免遗漏有临床意义的病变。我们旨在通过非常早期的、充分 BP 的重复结肠镜检查,确定 BP 不充分患者中遗漏病变的发生率。

方法

对一项包括 BP 不充分患者的前瞻性多中心随机临床试验的数据进行了事后分析,然后对这些患者进行了重复结肠镜检查。BP 不充分定义为任何节段的波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评分<2 分。我们纳入了有任何结肠镜检查适应证的患者。计算了指数和重复结肠镜检查的腺瘤检出率(ADR)、高级别 ADR(AADR)和锯齿状息肉检出率(SPDR)。

结果

原始试验中 651 例 BP 不充分的患者中,413 例(63.4%)在重复结肠镜检查时达到了充分 BP。指数和重复结肠镜检查之间的中位间隔为 28 天。在重复结肠镜检查时,ADR 为 45.3%(95%可信区间[CI],40.5-50.1%),AADR 为 10.9%(95% CI,8.1-14.3%),SPDR 为 14.3%(95% CI,10.9-17.7%)。4 例患者(1%;95% CI,0.2-2.5%)发现癌症。所有高级别腺瘤(AA)的 60.2%是在重复结肠镜检查时发现的。BBPS 评分=0 的结肠段发现了最多的 AA(66.1%)和所有 4 例癌症。

结论

BP 不充分的患者在重复结肠镜检查时发现 AA 的发生率很高。当结肠镜检查的结肠段评分 BBPS=0 时,我们建议尽快重复结肠镜检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f46a/9545231/1a1b9836e9bb/DEN-34-1176-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f46a/9545231/1a1b9836e9bb/DEN-34-1176-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f46a/9545231/1a1b9836e9bb/DEN-34-1176-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence of missed lesions in patients with inadequate bowel preparation through a very early repeat colonoscopy.非常早期重复结肠镜检查中肠道准备不充分患者的漏诊病变发生率。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Sep;34(6):1176-1184. doi: 10.1111/den.14278. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
2
Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.良好优于优秀:肠道准备质量与腺瘤检出率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):691-699.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.032.
3
The effect of quality of segmental bowel preparation on adenoma detection rate.肠段准备质量对腺瘤检出率的影响。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1019-8.
4
Inadequate Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores predict the risk of missed neoplasia on the next colonoscopy.Boston 肠道准备评分不足预示着下一次结肠镜检查中漏诊肿瘤的风险。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):744-751. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
5
What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.何种程度的肠道准备质量需要早期重复结肠镜检查:准备质量对腺瘤检出率影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov;109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.232. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
6
Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.筛查结肠镜检查中肠道准备不充分患者的腺瘤遗漏率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
7
Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men.男性筛查或监测结肠镜检查中充分肠道准备的量化评估
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):396-405; quiz e14-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.041. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
8
Predictive factors for missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy: A KASID multicenter study.初始结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的患者中,在重复结肠镜检查时遗漏腺瘤的预测因素:一项 KASID 多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 26;13(4):e0195709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195709. eCollection 2018.
9
Multi-step validation of a deep learning-based system for the quantification of bowel preparation: a prospective, observational study.基于深度学习的肠道准备量化系统的多步骤验证:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Nov;3(11):e697-e706. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00109-6. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
10
Importance of reporting segmental bowel preparation scores during colonoscopy in clinical practice.结肠镜检查过程中报告节段性肠道准备评分在临床实践中的重要性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 7;21(13):3994-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3994.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective validation of the Barcelona scale for the assessment of mucosal cleanliness during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.用于评估上消化道内镜检查时黏膜清洁度的巴塞罗那量表的前瞻性验证。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 13;18:17562848251363873. doi: 10.1177/17562848251363873. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and validation of a gut motility based model for predicting bowel preparation quality.一种基于肠道动力预测肠道准备质量模型的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 2;15(1):28265. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13739-0.
3
Impact of WeChat guidance on bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a quasi-experiment study.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic yield of early repeat colonoscopy after suboptimal bowel preparation in a fecal immunochemical test-based screening program.基于粪便免疫化学试验的筛查方案中,肠道准备不充分时早期重复结肠镜检查的诊断率。
Endoscopy. 2020 Dec;52(12):1093-1100. doi: 10.1055/a-1191-3011. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
2
Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020.结肠镜息肉切除术后监测:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南-2020 年更新。
Endoscopy. 2020 Aug;52(8):687-700. doi: 10.1055/a-1185-3109. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
3
Educational nurse-led telephone intervention shortly before colonoscopy as a salvage strategy after previous bowel preparation failure: a multicenter randomized trial.
微信指导对结肠镜检查肠道准备的影响:一项准实验研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 18;13(1):11553. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37435-z.
结肠镜检查前教育护士电话干预作为既往肠道准备失败后的补救策略:一项多中心随机试验。
Endoscopy. 2020 Nov;52(11):1026-1035. doi: 10.1055/a-1178-9844. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Long-term colorectal cancer incidence after adenoma removal and the effects of surveillance on incidence: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.腺瘤切除后结直肠癌的长期发病率和监测对发病率的影响:一项多中心、回顾性、队列研究。
Gut. 2020 Sep;69(9):1645-1658. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320036. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
5
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019.结肠镜检查的肠道准备:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南 - 更新 2019 年。
Endoscopy. 2019 Aug;51(8):775-794. doi: 10.1055/a-0959-0505. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
6
Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.结肠镜检查中腺瘤漏诊率的大小、危险因素及相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1661-1674.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
7
Colonoscopy quality requisites for selecting surveillance intervals: A World Endoscopy Organization Delphi Recommendation.结肠镜检查质量要求选择监测间隔:世界内镜组织 Delphi 推荐意见。
Dig Endosc. 2018 Nov;30(6):750-759. doi: 10.1111/den.13229. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
8
Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的预测因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug;30(8):819-826. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001175.
9
Adenoma surveillance and colorectal cancer incidence: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study.腺瘤监测与结直肠癌发病率:一项回顾性、多中心、队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):823-834. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30187-0. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
10
Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Bowel Preparation on Adenoma Detection: Early Adenomas Affected Stronger than Advanced Adenomas.肠道准备对腺瘤检测效果的Meta分析:早期腺瘤比进展期腺瘤受影响更强。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 3;11(6):e0154149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154149. eCollection 2016.