Suppr超能文献

基于人群的低危前列腺癌男性前瞻性队列的 5 年随访研究:前列腺癌治疗选择研究(TOPCS):研究方案。

Five-year follow-up study of a population-based prospective cohort of men with low-risk prostate cancer: the treatment options in prostate cancer study (TOPCS): study protocol.

机构信息

Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e056675. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056675.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Active surveillance (AS) is recommended for men with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC) to reduce overtreatment and to maintain patients' quality of life (QOL). However, whether African American (AA) men can safely undergo AS is controversial due to concerns of more aggressive disease and lack of empirical data on the safety and effectiveness of AS in this population. Withholding of AS may lead to a lost opportunity for improving survivorship in AA men. In this study, peer-reviewed and funded by the US Department of Defense, we will assess whether AS is an equally effective and safe management option for AA as it is for White men with LRPC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The project extends follow-up of a large contemporary population-based cohort of LRPC patients (n=1688) with a high proportion of AA men (20%) and well-characterised baseline and 2-year follow-up data. The objectives are to (1) determine any racial differences in AS adherence, switch rate from AS to curative treatment and time to treatment over 5 years after diagnosis, (2) compare QOL among AS group and curative treatment group over time, overall and by race and (3) evaluate whether reasons for switching from AS to curative treatment differ by race. Validation of survey responses related to AS follow-up procedures is being conducted through medical record review. We expect to obtain 5-year survey from ~900 (20% AA) men by the end of this study to have sufficient power. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques will be used to examine racial differences in AS adherence, effectiveness and QOL.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The parent and current studies were approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Wayne State University and Emory University. Since it is an observational study, ethical or safety risks are low. We will disseminate our findings to relevant conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

摘要

简介

主动监测(AS)被推荐用于治疗低危前列腺癌(LRPC)患者,以减少过度治疗并维持患者的生活质量(QOL)。然而,由于担心疾病更具侵袭性以及缺乏关于 AS 在该人群中的安全性和有效性的经验数据,非洲裔美国人(AA)男性是否可以安全地接受 AS 存在争议。如果不采用 AS,可能会丧失改善 AA 男性生存机会的机会。在这项由美国国防部资助的研究中,我们将评估 AS 是否是 LRPC 中 AA 男性与白人男性一样有效的管理选择。

方法和分析

该项目扩展了对一个大型当代基于人群的 LRPC 患者队列(n=1688)的随访,该队列中有相当比例的 AA 男性(20%),且基线和 2 年随访数据特征良好。其目的是:(1)确定 AS 依从性、从 AS 转为根治性治疗的转换率以及诊断后 5 年内治疗时间方面的任何种族差异;(2)比较 AS 组和根治性治疗组随时间推移的 QOL,总体情况和按种族情况进行比较;(3)评估从 AS 转为根治性治疗的原因是否因种族而异。正在通过病历审查验证与 AS 随访程序相关的调查回复的有效性。我们预计在本研究结束时,将从大约 900 名(20%AA)男性中获得 5 年的调查结果,以获得足够的效力。将使用描述性和推断性统计技术来检查 AS 依从性、有效性和 QOL 方面的种族差异。

伦理和传播

父母和当前的研究均获得了韦恩州立大学和埃默里大学机构审查委员会的批准。由于这是一项观察性研究,因此风险较低。我们将把我们的研究结果传播到相关会议和同行评议期刊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a197/8860062/f32e90849fa3/bmjopen-2021-056675f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验